MTH306 - 1 Normal Subgroup and Coset

You might also like

Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 10

MTH306

ABSTRACT ALGEBRA II
(Normal Subgroups and Cosets)
By
Dr. L. A. Ademola
Department of Mathematics,
University of Jos.
Chapter 1 (part 1)
• Normal Subgroup, Minimal normal subgroups, Maximal normal
subgroups.
• Left and Right Coset
• Lemma and Theorem
Definitions
i) Let , then is called a normal subgroup of if every left coset of is a right
coset of . i.e,
iff for all .
Or iff
ii) Let , then is called a Minimal normal subgroup of , if is normal in and
there is no other normal subgroup such that
.
iii) Let , then is called a Maximal normal subgroup of , if is normal in and
there is no other normal subgroup such that
.
Definitions
• Let be a group and a normal subgroup of . The quotient denotes the set
of left cosets of
In . i.e., G}. The product in , takes the form aG. The identity is , and the
inverse of is .
• The number of cosets in a group is also known as the index of the group,
so if , then
“index of ”.
Lemma 1.4
Let be a group and . Then
1. iff .
2. If is normal in then .
3. is normal in iff the product of two of its cosets is again a coset
*We will be proving (1) and (2), students are to refer to their lecture
notes for the proof of (3).*
Proof of Lemma 1.4
1) Proof:
“ ” Firstly, suppose that , then
, because .
“ ” i.e, Conversely, suppose , to show that , we will need to show that (i) for
any then and that (iii) .
So, for (i) since . To prove (ii), the fact that we see that , means there
exists , so

So
Cont. Proof of Lemma 1.4

For (iii)

By hypothesis
By associativity
because
So,
Thus, since , we conclude that
Cont. Proof of Lemma 1.4
• 2) Proof: Since is normal in , it follows from the definition of a normal
subgroup that for all , , and since , it is clear that .
Theorem 1.6
L is a group and are finite subgroups of . T .
Proof:
Clearly, , so can partition . Set , so can be expressed as ………(1)
where
Recall that the number of cosets in a group is also known as the
index of the group and that if , then “index of ”.
So, since there are cosets in , it follows that
index of , becomes .
Cont. Proof of Theorem 1.6
Now the goal is to find , so applying to (1), where (1) is , we get that

This is because .
So,
……….(2)
Substituting (1) into (2), where (1) is we get that
.

You might also like