Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Checkpoint 2
Checkpoint 2
• debugging doublet
IN PROGRESS
detection /scrublet
errors manually
• Working Group 1
(Genome imputation and
QC)
• Solved issues with genome lifting from hg19 to hg38 ( non lifting of 40% of all snps)
• Exclued scvi because of high run time and need for gpu
KNN5
Conclusion : remove
• view PDF file for better
much more non
resolution
doublets than True
doublets
Example of 1 library
adjusted accurcay : TrueDBLS/ method Total dbls * 12/11 to accuracy: method TrueDBLS/ method Total dbls
adjust for missed fraction of demuxlet power: method TrueDBLS/ Demuxlet True dbls
KNN5
61% accuracy DD
66% adjusted accuracy 76% accuracy
81% power of true doublets detection 83% adj-accuracy
77% power
11/12 True doublets KNN10
77% accuracy
84% adj-acc
65% power
KNN5 Scrublet
61% accuracy DD 76% accuracy
66% adjusted accuracy 76% accuracy 0.82 adj-accuracy
81% power of true doublets detection 83% adj-acc 75% power
77% power
KNN10
77% accuracy
84% adj-acc
65% power
Example of 1 library
DD&knn10 &scr
accuracy 89%
power 55%
DD&scr
DD&KNN5 accuracy 0.81% DD&knn5&scr
accuracy 84% power %75 accuracy85 %
power 66% power %66
DD&knn10
accuracy 88%
power 59%
KNN10
Conclustion :
most responable
doublet detected rate
using the combination
of KNN10 +
Doubletdetection tool
EXAM ON 15TH OF NOVEMBER
spend 11: 14 november studying
To Do
• Continuing scRna processing: Utilizing the best methods after assessing various
tools for doublet detection, Further QC as removing dead cells ( high % mt and
low count reads per cell ), automatic cell labeling
KNN10
67% accuracy
73% adj-acc
69% power
0.83 0.87
0.86 0.79
84% acc