Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 12

Unit 4

Pole zero cancellation design:


S11
Notch filter

Minor loop feedback control.


S12
Advantages and Applications

Case Study: IEC61131 Standards


S13
Programming language for industrial automation.
Pole zero cancellation design
• A common practice in designing controllers in s-plane or z-
plane is to cancel the undesired poles or zeros of plant
transfer function by the zeros and poles of controller.
• New poles and zeros can also be added in some advantageous
locations. However, one has to keep in mind that pole-zero
cancellation scheme does not always provide satisfactory
solution.
• Moreover, if the undesired poles are near jω axis, inexact
cancellation, which is almost inevitable in practice, may lead
to a marginally stable or even unstable closed loop system.
• For this reason one should never try to cancel an unstable
pole.
• The system is stable if all of the poles are in the OLHP, and these poles are
the roots of the polynomial D(s). It is important to note that one should
not cancel any common poles and zeros of the transfer function before
checking the roots of D(s).
• Specically, suppose that both of the polynomials N(s) and D(s) have a root
at s = a, for some complex (or real) number a. One must not cancel out this
common zero and pole in the transfer function before testing for stability.
• The reason for this is that, even though the pole will not show up in the
response to the input, it will still appear as a result of any initial conditions
in the system, or due to additional inputs entering the system (such as
disturbances).
• If the pole and zero are in the CRHP, the system response might blow up
due to these initial conditions or disturbances, even though the input to
the system is bounded, and this would violate BIBO stability.
Notch filter or Notch controller
Minor loop feedback control.

You might also like