Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Prescription Writing
Prescription Writing
Prescription Writing
----NO----
Pharmacovigilance ….why?
In the general interest of all stake holders
Need of PVi in India
• To protect patients from unnecessary harm and increasing healthcare cost from
medicines
• ADRs are a huge burden !!
• Insufficient evidence of safety of a drug from clinical trials
• For Signal detection and risk minimisation measures
• Early detection of new ADRs on patients subgroups of exceptional sensitivity
(Paediatrics, Geriatrics, Pregnant women)
• Promoting rational use of medicines and medication adherence
• To support regulatory agencies in decision making process for safe use of
medicines
• Boosting public confidence for safe and proper use of medicines
PV : A Continuous Process…
• Pharmacovigilance
starts with clinical development continues throughout the product life cycle of
the drug
• Pharmacovigilance
• pre-marketing (pre-approval)
• post marketing (post-approval)
• More info is needed about specific groups like children, elderly, pregnant women,
etc.
• Also after chronic use, and in combination with other drugs
• Experience has shown that, ADRs, interactions with drugs and food, and risk
factors surface several years after release of these medicines (WHO, 2004)
How to prevent ADRs
An answer of YES to one or more of these questions would suggest that the ADR
could have been prevented
Barriers to ADR monitoring for HCPs
• HCPs workload
• Unfamiliarity with/ ignorance about ADRs
• Uncoordinated care/ no team work
• Lack of standardized monitoring systems in patient safety
• Communication failures
• Patient non-adherence (accidental, deliberate, informed or
uninformed)
How to improve ADR reporting?
• The HCPs should be trained about the necessity and procedure of
adverse event reporting through CME, workshops, conferences
• Post training reminders : periodic E-mails and SMS alerts should be
regularly sent to HCPs
• Dedicated curriculum hours in medical (UG and PG level), nursing and
pharmacy courses
• Incentives (financial or non financial) to promote the reporting
• Involvement of patient advocacy/support group
Role of health care professionals in pharmacovigilance
Physician’s Role In Pharmacovigilance
Conclusions..
• ADRs and PV remains a challenging clinical and scientific discipline
• It continues to expand its domain due to the ever increasing number of medicinal
products
• The benefits of drug therapy should always be greater than the risks
• Risk can be minimized by ensuring good quality, safe, efficacious, and rationally
used medicines
• Knowledge, education and risk management strategies crucial for
preventing/minimizing ADRs
Conclusion..
• ADRs are an inherent risk of using medications and does not signify
negligence of healthcare providers
• ADRs detected must be reported, analyzed and communicated
• Foster a sense of trust among patients with regard to the medicines they
use and improve communications between HCPs and public
• Provide regulators with necessary information to amend
recommendations on drug use
Take home message !!!
• We must always remember that
‘‘there are no biologically safe drugs; there are only safe physicians, nurses and
pharmacists’’.
• You need not be certain about ADR to report it
• Have a high degree of suspicion
• Report any suspected ADR
• Be a life saver
Thank you
To report ADRs in KBN teaching and general hospital
Contact:
Dept of Pharmacology, KBN University-FOMS
Whatsapp No: 7892548362
• Program roadmap..
• •2010 –2015 –now extended
• •05 phases, year wise objectives framed
• •At present > 200 centers
• •Collaboration with WHO-UMC
• •Access to Vigibase software which contains worldwide drug safety data
• •Bottom line : safer medicines for population
• Need for Pharmacovigilance
• Sultana J, Cutroneo P, Trifirò G. Clinical and economic burden of adverse drug
reactions. Journal of Pharmacology and Pharmacotherapeutics. 2013;4(5):73. Patel K,
Kedia M, Bajpai D, Mehta S, Kshirsagar N, Gogtay N. Evaluation of the prevalence and
economic burden of adverse drug reactions presenting to the medical emergency
department of a tertiary referral centre: a prospective study. BMC Clinical
Pharmacology. 2007;7(1):8.
• Type of Reports (Resource)
• •Spontaneous report: healthcare professionals, consumer
• •Solicitedreport from patient support programmes like organized data collection systems
which include clinical trials, other patient support and disease management programs,
surveys of patients or healthcare providers.
• •Marketing program, literature source, lay media, web page social sites
• Type of Reports (Resource)
• •Spontaneous report: healthcare professionals, consumer
• •Solicitedreport from patient support programmes like organized data collection systems
which include clinical trials, other patient support and disease management programs,
surveys of patients or healthcare providers.
• •Marketing program, literature source, lay media, web page social sites
• Aggregate Reporting (PSUR/PBRER)
• •Key role in safety assessment of Drugs.
• •It involves compilation of safety data of drug over a prolonged period of time.
• •Causality assessment
• Stepwise discovery of an ADR
• -Signal generation (detection)
• -Signal strengthening
• -Signal follow-up
• Causality assessment
• Hutchison defined causality assessment as a “method for eliciting a state of
information about a particular drug-event connection as input and delivering as
output a degree of belief about the truth of the proposition that the drug caused
the event to occur”.
Causality Assessment
• Prior reports of reaction
• Temporal relationship
• De-challenge
• Re-challenge
• Dose-response relationship
• Alternative etiologies
• Objective confirmation
• Past history of reaction to same or similar medication
Causality Assessment scales
• Naranjo’s scale
• Probable
• Possible
• Unlikely
• Conditional / Unclassified
• Unassessible / Unclassifiable
• WHO Initiative
• •Initially 10 countries : pilot project
• •Network has since expanded, and currently 153member countries are having
national PVig programmes
• •They coordinate with the WHO and the collaborating Uppsala Monitoring Centre
(UMC) in Sweden, the International Drug Monitoring Centre, came up in 1978
• •Global ADR database maintained (Vigibase)
• •Currently, database contains >7 million reports
• PV in India : the evolution…
• •1986 : ADR monitoring system -12 centers (ICMR)
• •1997 : WHO programme based in Uppsala, Sweden coordinated PV in India (AIIMS, Delhi,
KEM, Mumbai, JLN (Aligarh)
• (unsuccessful attempts)
• •2005 : WHO-World Bank sponsored National PV programme of India–had Zonal centers –2,
Regional centers -5, Peripheral centers –28
• •2010 -2015 and extended –CDSCO sponsored Pharmacovigilance programme of India
(IPC co-ordinated)
• Pharmacovigilance Programme of India (PvPI) for
• Assuring Drug Safety
• 2010-2015 now extended
• Central Drugs Standard Control Organization (CDSCO),
• Directorate General of Health Services,
• Ministry of Health & Family Welfare, Govt. of India
• in collaboration with
• Indian Pharmacopoeia Commission (IPC), Ghaziabad,
U.P.(www.cdsco.nic.in/pharmacovigilance_intro.htm)
Summary
• ADRs are common entity in Indian health care system
• It is an inherent risk of using medications and does not signify negligence of healthcare
providers
• HCPs are important stakeholders for reporting and prevention of ADRs
• Safety improvement activities include identification, reporting and analysis of the errors
by dedicated team lead by a clinical pharmacologist
• Nursing and Pharmacists curriculum should include pharmacovigilance to strengthen
Pharmacovigilance program of India
• Patient information, empowerment and engagement on pharmacovigilance will
strengthen PVPI further.
Pharmacovigilance: Where ?