Week-1 Objectives Course Expectation and requirement
Introduction to key concepts of Peace and conflict
Peace psychology is a subfield of psychology and peace research that deals with the psychological aspects of peace, conflict, violence, and war.
Peace psychology can be characterized by four
interconnected pillars: (1) research, (2) education, (3) practice, and (4) advocacy. Definition Peace psychology seeks to develop theories and practices aimed at the prevention and mitigation of direct and structural violence.
Framed positively, peace psychology promotes the
nonviolent management of conflict and the pursuit of social justice, what we refer to as peacemaking and peace building, respectively. Goals of Peace Psychology To increase and apply psychological knowledge in the pursuit of peace . . . [including] both the absence of destructive conflict and the creation of positive social conditions which minimize destructiveness and promote human well-being” (Society for the Study of Peace, Conflict, and Violence, 2006, para. 3)
The lack of knowledge about the psychology of peace reinforces a
faulty assumption that: peace is precarious, unusual, short-lived, or fragile and that the true state of human affairs arises from deep-rooted urges for aggression, which sooner or later give rise to violence and war. Human beings have abilities to manufacture both peace and violence: As Deutsch (1999) put it, “Humans have the potential for a wide range of thought, feeling, and behavior: the potential for love as well as hate, for constructive as well as destructive behavior, for “we” as well as “us versus them.” There is no reason to assume that one potential or another is inherently pre-potent without regard to particular personal and social circumstances as well as life history. (p. 19).
Finally, ignorance about the rich domain of peace psychology prevents
practitioners from applying its valuable insights to promote peace in families, workplaces, communities, and between nations. Such ignorance denies citizens and policymakers insights that could inform their approach to critical issues such as the best ways of preventing terrorism, the costs and impact of torture, and possibly means of improving extended conflicts. Historical Roots of Peace Psychology William James, in a speech at Stanford University in 1906, coined the phrase “the moral equivalent of war” James argued that war provides human beings with opportunities to express their spiritual inclinations toward self-sacrifice and personal honor; consequently, to end war, societies must find alternative “moral equivalents” for the expression of these profoundly important human values. Cold War Peace Psychology Peace psychology emerged as a distinct area of research and practice during Cold War, when the preeminent concern was the prevention of nuclear war.
Post–Cold War Peace Psychology
Peace psychologists have shifted away from a narrow focus on the prevention of nuclear war and have moved toward a more geo historically, nuanced, conceptually differentiated and systemically integrated perspective on violence and peace. Cont…… Three themes emerged in post-cold war peace psychology: Greater sensitivity to geo historical context A more differentiated perspective on the meanings and types of violence and peace, A system view of the nature of violence and peace Scope Scholarship Academics Education Research Practice Independent Practice Government Foundations Activism Corporate Individual and Social Responsibility Some Contributions of PEACE PSYCHOLOGIST Behavioral scientists played a key role in the 1951 Supreme Court decision to integrate graduate schools in the United States when scientists offered testimony that segregation was “psychologically damaging.”
Psychologists also have drawn from Bandura's social cognitive
theory as an intellectual scaffolding to produce serial social dramas that have promoted social justice through demonstrable changes in literacy, gender equality, HIV prevention, and family planning.
Ignacio Martín-Baró, a social psychologist, inspired the liberation
psychology movement that swept across Latin America in the 1980s and continues to spawn community based and culturally grounded emancipatory agendas all over the world. Hamdi Malik and colleagues at the University of Indonesia used a grassroots and unofficial diplomacy approach to bring Christian and Muslim communities together in a social movement called Baku Bae (reconciliation), replacing violence with the cooperative pursuit of common goals.
Brandon Hamber and colleagues in South Africa established Khulumani
(Speak Out), a support and self-help group for victims of political violence in South Africa, a group that turned to activism and was instrumental in having the “secrecy clauses” removed from the first draft of the Truth and Reconciliation Commission Act. If the initial draft had been accepted, all TRC hearings would have been behind closed doors, an arrangement that was unacceptable to most victims. These and many other contributions that continue to accumulate attest to the value and promise of peace psychology. Home Work Reading “Peace Psychology for a Peaceful World”