India Kh. Bijoykumar Singh SCSNEI, JNU Mobile: 8800103921 Email: bijoykhaba@yahoo.com Formation of North Eastern states The ensuing First Anglo-Burmese War resulted in the entire region coming under British control. In the colonial period (1826–1947), North East India was made a part of Bengal Province from 1839 to 1873, after which Colonial Assam became its own province known as NEFA, but which included Sylhet. After Indian Independence from British Rule in 1947, the Northeastern region of British India consisted of Assam and the princely states of Tripura Kingdom and Manipur Kingdom. Subsequently, Nagaland in 1963, Meghalaya in 1972, Arunachal Pradesh in 1975 (capital changed to Itanagar) (formed on 20 February 1987) and Mizoram (formed on 20 February 1987) were formed out of the large territory of Assam.[32] Manipur and Tripura remained Union Territories of India from 1956 until 1972, when they attained fully-fledged statehood. Sikkim was integrated as the eighth North Eastern Council state in 2002. Northeast India, officially known as the North Eastern Region (NER) is the easternmost region of India representing both a geographic and political administrative division of the country. Now it has separate Council Called NEC (1972) under M- DONER Religious population of NE States Religious population in North Eastern Region, according to 2011 Census of India[82] Religion Christianit Other State Hinduism Islam Buddhism Jainism Sikhism Not y Religions Stated Arunachal 401,876 27,045 418,732 162,815 771 3,287 362,553 6,648 Pradesh
Total 24,726,344 11,466,329 7,893,055 627,527 33,244 33,645 903,545 88,499
Religious-Linguistic Composition of NE Region
Religion in Northeast India (2011)
Hindu (54.02%) Islam (25.05%) Christianity (17.24%) Buddhism (1.37%) Jainism (0.07%) Sikhism (0.07%) Other (1.97%) No religion (0.21%)
Linguistic groups: The earliest settlers may have been
Austroasiatic speakers from Southeast Asia, followed by Tibeto- Burman speakers from China, and by 500 BCE Indo-Aryan speakers from the Gangetic Plains as well as Kra–Dai speakers from southern Yunnan (China) and Shan State (Burma) Historical Facts of the Past No Common History No Common language, religion and cultural tradition. Two Distinct Environment, Ecology and mode of production Two distinct socio-cultural and religious life Two distinct Political system corresponding with Hill and Valley – Lallup and Paik system Vs Chieftainship Religious Evolution also took place in different historical periods both in Hills and Valley having different impacts on the peoples and inter-group relationship (Binary Opposite theory) Three monarchical states were rose in Imphal Valley (Meitrapak), Brahmaputra Valley (Ahom) and Tripura Valley (Tekhao). Hypothesis/Questions Questions: Why state formation took place only in the valley communities and the same did not occur among the hill communities? Why Hinduism could not climb the hills of North East India? Hypothesis: There is always a binary opposition between Hills and valley in terms of its socio-cultural, religious, economic and political institutions A particular religious ethics provides the spirit and philosophical foundation for state formation among the valley communities of North East India The religious evolution that took place in the valley formed the basis for state formation in North East India. (A) Geography, Ecology and Religion in North East India Three oldest Himalayan kingdom of Ahom, Meitrapak, Tekhao apart from Nepal and Bhutan Two distinct geographies in terms of Landscape, resources, ecology and culture (folk environment) Folk environment consists of folk ecology, folk culture, folk mode of production (primitive mode of production), folk belief and practices, all of which precisely shape and reshape the uniqueness and similarity among various folk communities. The limited resources available in a specific environment and ecology also make interdependence between hills and valley communities which need to maintain both harmony and co-operation among them (Weekly market) And the limited resources available in a particular folk environment also make conflict and competition among various communities in North East India. Thus paradox here is maintenance of both conflict and harmony which is to confusing for many research scholar to define the relationship between hills and valley. Impact of these two environments and ecologies (A) Harmony: Myths of common origin – two brothers, Three brother, etc. Common rites, rituals and festivals – Mera Hao Chongba, Harvesting festival (Common friendship) Etao And Eta Seasonal product exchange (Weekly market) Conflict: Inter tribal conflict- war and witchcraft Hierarchy and domination myths of hostility, rejection and barbaric - Kabui Keioiba and Hareima Sampubi, etc. Aspect of Valley civilization and negation of hill tribes Binary opposite between hill and valley people Traditional society and Great transformation in NE India Hinduisation of Valley society Islamic invasion and Muslim migration Colonialism (Treaty of Yandaboo) and Bengali and Nepali migration Colonialism and Christianity Revivalism Note: all these epoch of transformation or religious evolution took place with social transformation from simple to complex. Forms of Society (Social Solidarity) Mechanical and organic solidarity Mechanical : Likeness in which all the individuals work or perform similar activities. Difference is little as posible. Organic: Dissimilar parts working differently for functional of whole Crime and punishment Repressive and restitutive corresponding with two forms of solidarity (mechanical and organic) Any punishment is not to eliminate or harm person but to restore the collective conscience eroded by act of crime. Religious evolution Elementary form of religious life (Totemism) State patronized Religion – From totemism to Community religion (Ancestor Worship) Community Religion to State Patronized Religion (Kamakhya, Umanglai and Hinduism) Revivalism/Institutionalisation of tribal religion. (Donyi polo, Seng Khasi, Heraka, Etc.) Thank You