Boundary Layer Non-Linear Convective Flow of Sisko

Fluid with Variable Thermal Conductivity over an

Inclined Permeable Electromagnetic Sheet

Shakil Bhuiyan
Exam Roll: 94056
Reg: 2017-014-023
Session: 2020-2021(4th year)

1
 Contents
 Introductions
 Literature reviews
 Problem formation
 Mathematical Equations
 Numerical analysis
 Graphical analysis
 Conclusions
 References
2 2
 Introduction
• On this study we are interested on convective heat
transfer of a inclined permeable electromagnetic sheet
with thermal variable conductivity.
• It is covering our most engineering process, such as the
aerodynamics extrusions of plastic sheet, hot rolling, glass
fiber production, wire drawing, the cooling and drying of
paper and textile and so on.
• Also there are some rheological complex liquids , for
instance, polymeric fluids organic liquids, penetrating
mud, drilling mud, liquid crystals, biological fluids,
paints ,greasing up oils and many others
3 3
 Literature reviews

• S.Ostrach [1] is the pioneer of the study of convection flow

• Sakiadis [2] first analyzed momentum heat transfer upon BL.
• Crane [3] extended these works.
• Slaouti et.al [8] noticed the change of heat transfer.
• Mabood et al. [10] obtained the numerical solutions .
• Masood Khan [13] analyzed viscous dissipation.
• Shaw [14] investigate the convection flow of Sisko-Nanofluids over an inclined
electromagnetic sheet.
• Ishak et al. [15] has investigated the heat transfer over an unsteady streaching surface with
prescribed wall

4
 Problem formations

• Consider 2D, laminar, unsteady nonlinear

convective flow of Sisko fluid over an inclined
electromagnetic stretching sheet.

• It is assumed that the sheet velocity along x- axis

and y- axis are u and v respectively. The plate is
inclined at angle on x-axis is shown at figure-1.

• Electricmagnetic sheet neglecting the edge

effects both applied electric and magnetic field.
The Lorentz force F involve in the x-direction. Fig- Flow pattern and coordinate
system of Sisko fluid flow
Increasing distance from y , decreasing rapidly.

5
 Mathematical Equations

• Governing equations (Shaw [14] , Ziabakhsh [17])

• Boundary conditions

6
 Similarity transformations ( Ishak [15])

• Skin friction coefficient

• Nusselt number

7
• Transformed equations

• Boundary conditions

8
 ,

Physical parameters

Material parameter Grashof number

Mixed convection parameter Sisko fluid parameter

Nonlinear convection parameter Grinberg parameter

The modified Hartmann number Width parameter

Prandtl number Eckert number

The material constant ratio parameter

Suction Parameter The thermal diffusivity

9
 Numerical solutions

• The numerical solution of the nonlinear ordinary differential equations along with the boundary
conditions . And we kept tolerance level 10^(-6) while using numerical technique to solve the
differential equations ,the main steps of the solution technique are follows

Boundary conditions

10
 Computational validification

Table-1: Numerical values of the f’’(0) and for various values of Up when fm=1.5
Pr=1,R=0
Parameters

Zaibakhsh [17] Present Zaibakhsh [17] Present

0.0
-2.0020100 -2.0020100 -2.0000001 -2.0020100
1.0
-2.2223554 -2.2231274 -2.2223554 -2.2231274
1.5
-2.3310177 -2.3011265 -2.3310177 -2.3011265
2.0
-2.4360794 -2.4387390 -2.4360794 -2.4387390
2.5
-2.53771027 -2.5573201 -2.53771027 -2.5573201

• To validate our present result , we made a comparison of our calculation with

those of Ziabakhsh et al. [17] for the Skin friction coefficient and rate of heat
transfer for some limiting cases, which implicates a great agreement as shown
Table-1
11
Table -2: Skin friction and local Nusselt number for different R, n, fm , and Up for M=0, A=1, Pr=0.7 , V=0.01, Ec=0.1

0.1 0.04310310 0.46047910

0.25 , 0.10769310 0.46023310
0.5 0.21540110 0.46017410
0.75 0.32346810 0.46214610
0.9 0.76922410 0.46116910
1 0.75431810 0.46114310
1.25 0.57022110 0.46108710
0.9 1.34481210 0.96076710
1.0 1.50774110 1.06069910
1.5 2.35218010 1.56034510
0.9 2.35214310 1.56026410
1.0 2.35213510 1.56024410
2.0 2.35205810 1.56007310

• Skin friction coefficient increases with R and Nusselt number decreases

• Increase in power index n raise wall shear stress and mass transfer rate
• Both physical parameter enhance with suction parameter fm
• Both decline with unsteadiness parameter Up 12
 Graphical analysis of result discussions
1 1
R=1.5 R=0.1
0.9 R=1.2 0.9 R=0.5
0.4 R=1
R=1
R=1.5
0.8 0.35 R=0.8 0.8
R=2.5
0.3 R=0.6
R=5
0.7 0.7
0.25

0.6 0.2 0.6

1.2 1.4 1.6

0.5 0.5

0.4 0.4

0.3 0.3
n=1.5 C=0 Ec=0.5 Pr=0.7M=0.5 A=0
0.2 Up=0.2 Sf =0.5 λT =0.001 β=0 γ=π/3
0.2
n=1.5 C=1 Ec=0.5 Pr=0.7 M=0.5 Up=0.2
0.1 0.1
Sf =0.5 λT =0.001 β=0 γ=π/3 A=0

0 0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

Fig.1 : Velocity profile for different material parameter R at C=0 Fig-2 . Velocity profile for different material parameter R at C=1.
1 1
n=1.5 C=0.1 R=1 Ec=0.5 Pr=0.7 M=0.5 Up=0.8 fm=0.1 fm=0.1
0.9 0.9
Sf =0.5 λT =0.001 β=0 γ=π/3 A=1 V=0 fm=0.8 fm=0.5
0.8 fm=1 0.8 fm=1
fm=1.5 fm=2.5
0.7 fm=2.5 0.7 fm=5
fm=5
0.6 0.6

0.5 0.5

0.4 0.4
n=1.5 C=0.1 R=1 Ec=0.5 Pr=0.7 M=0.5
0.3 0.3 Up=0.2 Sf =0.5 λT =0.01 β=0 γ=π/3 A=1

0.2 0.2

0.1 0.1

0 0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 5

Fig.3. Velocity Profile for different suction parameter Fig.4. Temperature profile for different Suction parameter
13
 1 1

Up=0.2 λT=1.5
0.9 n=1.5 C=0 R=1 Ec=0.5 Pr=0.7 M=0.5 0.9
0.35
Up=0.8 λT=3.5
Sf =0.5 λT =0.001 β=0 γ=π/3 A=0
Up=1.5
0.8 0.8 λT=7.5
Up=2.5 0.3
Up=4.0 λT=10
0.7 0.7

0.6 0.6 0.25

1.4 1.5 1.6 1.7

0.5 0.5

0.4 0.4
n=1.5 C=0 R=1 Ec=0.5 Pr=0.7 M=0.5
0.3 0.3 Up=0.2 Sf =0.5 β=0 γ=π/3 A=0

0.2 0.2

0.1 0.1

0 0
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 5 0 1 2 3 4 5 6

Fig.5. Velocity profile for different unsteadiness parameter . Fig.6 . Velocity profile for different mixed convection parameter.

1 1
M=0
M=0.1 n=1.5 C=0 R=1 Ec=0.5 Pr=0.7 Up=0.2 M=0.2
0.9 0.9
M=1 Sf =0.5 λT =0.001 β=0 γ=π/3 A=0 M=0.8
n=1.5 C=0.1 R=1 Ec=0.5 Pr=0.7 Up=0.2 M=1
M=1.5
0.8 Sf =0.5 λT =0.31 β=0 γ=π/3 A=1 0.8
M=2.5 M=1.6
M=5 M=10
0.7 0.7
M=8
M=20
0.6 0.6

0.5 0.5

0.4 0.4

0.3 0.3

0.2 0.2

0.1 0.1

0 0
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 5

Fig.7. Velocity profile with different Temperature parameter . Fig.8. Temperature profile with different Temperature parameter .

14
 1 1
0.45
Pr=0.1 Ec=0.2
0.9 n=1.5 C=1 R=1 Ec=0.5 M=0.5 Up=0.2 Pr=0.5 0.9 0.4
Ec=0.8
Sf =0.5 λT =0.001 β=0 γ=π/3 A=0 Pr=0.8 0.35
0.8 Pr=1 0.8 Ec=1
0.3
Pr=8 Ec=5
0.25
0.7 0.7
0.2 Ec=2.5
0.15
0.6 0.6 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5

0.5 0.5

0.4 0.4

n=1.5 C=1 R=1 Pr=0.7 M=0.5

0.3 0.3 Up=1.2 Sf =0.5 λT =0.01 β=0
γ=π/3 A=1 V=0.1
0.2 0.2

0.1 0.1

0 0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 5

Fig.9. Temperature profile for different Prandtl Number Fig.10. Temperature profile for different Eckert number
1 1.2
V=0.1
0.35
λT=1.5
0.9 V=0.5
λT=3.5 V=0.8
1
0.8 λT=7.5 V=1
0.3
λT=10
0.7
0.8

0.6 0.25
1.4 1.5 1.6 1.7

0.5 0.6
n=1.5 C=0 R=1 Ec=0.5 Pr=0.7 M=0.5 Up=0.2
Sf =0.5 λT =0.001 β=0 γ=π/3 A=1
0.4
n=1.5 C=0 R=1 Ec=0.5 Pr=0.7 M=0.5 0.4
0.3 Up=0.2 Sf =0.5 β=0 γ=π/3 A=0

0.2
0.2

0.1

0 0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3

Fig .11. Velocity profile for different mixed convection parameter Fig. 12. Temperature profile with different material constant
ratio parameter 15
 Conclusions

This present investigation highlights the impact of variable thermal conductivity , Viscous dissipation ,
electromagnetic field and melting heat transfer on non-linear convection flow of Sisko fluid to an inclined
electromagnetic sheet . The noticeable outcomes are .
• More suction reduce momentum boundary layer and also decelerate the flow velocity and temperature
profile .
• Electromagnetic field and Sisko fluid parameter estimate the acceleration of fluid motion.
• Increasing of temperature parameter extremly impact the heat transfer rate whereas there is minute effect
on velocity profile .
• Larger values Prandtl Number diminish the fluid temperature and boundary layer and there is no noticeable
effect of Pr on velocity profile Up.
• Eckert number has positive effect on both velocity and temperature profile and their corresponding
boundary layer .
• The unsteadiness parameter shows that both velocity and temperature profile decreases with increases in
• For the increasing power-law index n velocity profile as well as temperature profile was increased

16
 References

1. Ostrach S. , (1952) , An analysis of laminar free-convection flow and heat transfer about a flat plate parallel to the
direction of the generating body force, Technical Note, 4 , 6-6.
2. Sakiadis , B.C. , (1961) , Boundary-Layer Behaviour on Continuous Solid Surfaces: I. Boundary-Layer Equations for
Two Dimensional and Axis symmetric Flow , Journal of American Institute of Chemical Engineers , 7, 26-28.
3. Crane LJ. , (1970), Flow past a streaching plate , Journal of Applied Mathematics and Physics, 21, 645-7.
4. Erickson, L.E., Fan, L.T. and Fox, V.G. , (1966) , Heat and Mass Transfer of a Moving Continuous Flat Plate with Suction
or Injection, Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Fundamentals, 5, 19-25.
5. Johnson, C.H. and Cheng, P. , (1978) , Possible Similarity Solution for Free Convection Boundary Layers Adjacent to
Flat Plates in Porous Media , International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 21, 709-718.
6. Afzal N. and Hussain T. , (1984) , Mixed Convection over a Horizontal Plate, Journal of Heat Transfer, 106, 240-241.
7. Kumari, M., Slaouti, A., Nakamura, S., Takhar, H.S. and Nath, G. ,(1986) , Unsteady Free Convection Flow over a
Continuous Moving Vertical Surface , Acta Mechanica, 116, 75-82.
8. Slaouti, A., Takhar, H.S. and Nath, G. , (1998) , Unsteady Free Convection Flow in the Stagnation Point Region of a
Three-Dimensional Body , International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 41, 3397-3408.
9. Chamkha A.J. and Al-Mudhaf A. ,(2005) , Unsteady Heat and Mass Transfer from a Rotating Vertical Cone with a
Magnetic Field and Heat Generation or Absorption Effects, International Journal of Thermal Science, 44, 267-276.
10. Mahbood .F , Khan W.A. , Ismail A.I. , (2014) , MHD boundary layer flow and heat transfer of nanof luids over a
nonlinear streaching sheet :A numerical analysis , Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials, 374 , 569-576.
11. Sisko AW. , (1958), The flow of lubricating greases , Industrial Chemistry Research , 50, 1798-92.
12. Tanveer A. , Hayat T. , Alsaedi A. and Ahmadb B. , (2017), On modified Darcy's law utilization in peristalsis of Sisko
fluid, Journal of Molecular Liquids, 236 , 290-297.
13.Masood Khan,asif Munir and Azeem Shahzad. ,(2015) , Mixed Convective heat transfer to Siskofluid over a non-linear
radially streaching sheet , AIP Advances 5, 087178.
17
11. Sisko AW. , (1958), The flow of lubricating greases , Industrial Chemistry Research , 50, 1798-92.
12. Tanveer A. , Hayat T. , Alsaedi A. and Ahmadb B. , (2017), On modified Darcy's law utilization in peristalsis of Sisko
fluid, Journal of Molecular Liquids, 236 , 290-297.
13. Masood Khan,asif Munir and Azeem Shahzad. ,(2015) , Mixed Convective heat transfer to Siskofluid over a non-linear
radially streaching sheet , AIP Advances 5, 087178.
14. Sachin Shaw, S.S. Sen,M.K.Nayak, (2019) , Boundary layer non-linear convective flow of Sisko- nanofluid with melting
heat transfer over an inclined permeable electromagnetic sheet , Journal of Nanofluids, 8, 917-928.
15. Ishak A, Nazar R, Pop I. , (2009) , Heat transfer over an unsteady stretching permeable surface with prescribed wall
temperature , Nonlinear Analysis Real World Applications , 10 , 2909–13.
16. Shampine S. ,(2003), Solving ODES with MATLAB , Cambridge University Press , Cambridge.
17 . Ziabakhsh Z, Domairry G, Mozaffari M and Mahbobifar M. , (2010) , Analytic solution of heat transfer over an
unsteady stretching permeable surface with prescribed wall temperature , Journal of the Taiwan Institute of Chemical
Engineers , 41 , 169–77.
18. Grinberg E. , (1961), On determination of properties of some potential fields, Appl Magnetohydrodyn Rep Phys Inst
Riga 12 , 147–154.
19. Mahmood T. , Shahzad A. , Iqbal Z., Ahmed J. and Khan M. ,(2017), Computational modeling on 2D
magnetohydrodynamic flow of Sisko fluid over a time dependent streaching surface , Results in Physics , 7, 832-842.

18
Thank you

19