Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Collective Play
Collective Play
Notable thoughts
- the relationships established between players is more significant. They attend to the needs
and requests or demands of their teammates and can more frequently reproduce empathic
situations .
- If we want the whole to be more than the just sum of its parts, then we have to get the
players to empower each other using the connections that exist between them
- If we want to strengthen the interactions between the players on our team, we will not
prioritize recreational exercises our training sessions. Instead, we will focus on developing
interactions that can be significant during the game
Dynamic organization and reorganization , uncertainty
• Being in the right or wrong location only makes sense from a tactical point of view.
• players should play from their position and not in their position. Playing in their position
generates rigidity in the structure and, in soccer, this type of behavior goes against the needs
and demands of the game.
• Seirul·lo (2017) explains organization according to the ball using dimensioned stage spaces.
These spaces are linked and the importance of the game continuum is considered here;
before, during, and after. Between them, some unexpected element that emerges from the
game is always added
• If we want ball-based organization, the most important stage space is that of intervention,
where the possessor and the first defender are located.
• playing as 11. Players in the space of intervention intervene; players in the space of mutual
assistance participate; and players in the space of cooperation permit. Everyone plays and
everyone contributes to leveraging advantages and correcting errors; everyone has
something to do for the team.
• Paying attention to siveral spatial references makes it easier for players to position
themselves properly on the playing field and, from that location, they are able to help the
team deal with the advantages and errors that occur in the game.
Game cycle and its transitions
Developments, which don’t imply a recovery or loss, between any substage and
playing context; 1st level of specificity
• The game cycle allows us to differentiate between sub stages and contexts and move between them.
• there are often changes in sub stages and contexts within the same stage of play, without a recovery or
loss. We have to respond to this other type of transition that we call development in order to distinguish
it, since there is no change of stage.
• If we want to train or analyze the build-up play, we have to understand the situation from which it arises,
as well as what can be linked to it. Figure :Developments within the game cycle
Responding to and analyzing unstable situations:
- In addition to the inability of teams to evolve between subs tages of play and
playing contexts, they also have to deal with many unstable situations where the
level of uncertainty increases.
- it is essential to give answers to our players for unstable situations that are so
decisive in the end result.
- the level of uncertainty in this sport is very high and, consequently, it is difficult to
draw meaningful conclusions from the analysis of what happened in games . But it
could be done.
Game cycle problems in analysis:
- separating the different sub stages. In doing so, the focus is placed on the existing
link between them, and behaviors demonstrated in developments of play are not
recognized
- understanding the game cycle correctly implies understanding that the order in
which the different sub stages and contexts emerge and are connected is not cyclical
or sequential, but random. Game transitions and developments can occur between
or from any playing context
- when we use higher levels of specificity, it is easy to understand that the
connection between situations is random.
The system of play and its structures
• The system as a structural or functional
reference and the structure as a photograph