Professional Documents
Culture Documents
HOA Workshop Supportive Slides
HOA Workshop Supportive Slides
Workshop
2nd of March 2024
3:00 PM – 5:00 PM
Conrad Hotel Dubai
Bispecifics: from
Data to Practice
Dr. Samar Ousia
CD3xCD20 as a Potential Target in R/R B-cell NHL
• Specific and efficacious targeted agents that have manageable safety profiles can help bridge the treatment gap and
improve outcomes in patients with R/R B-NHL
• As CD20 is a validated target in the treatment of B-NHL, bsAbs that simultaneously target CD20 on tumor cells and
CD3 on T cells have demonstrated antitumor activity in patients with R/R B-cell NHL 1-3
B-NHL, B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma; bsAb, bispecific antibody; IV, intravenous; R/R, relapsed/refractory; SC, subcutaneous
1. Engelberts PJ, et al. EBioMedicine. 2020;52:102625. 2. Buhmann R, et al. J Transl Med. 2013;11:160. 3. Hutchings M, et al. J Clin Oncol. 2021;39(18):1959-70. 4. Hutchings M, et al. Lancet. 2021;398:1157-69.
5. Matasar MJ, et al. Presented at ASH 2020. [Abstract #2096]. 6. Olszewski AJ, et al. Presented at ASH 2020. [Abstract #401]. 7. Bannerji R, et al. Presented at ASH 2020. [Abstract #400].
Epcoritamab Differentiation Safety: SC formulation and CRS with predictable onset
Epcoritamab has a manageable safety profile with SC administration revealing predictable, predominately
low-grade CRS events mostly occurring after the first full dose.
1
Predictable onset to ease management
Epcoritamab1 Glofitamab2
CRS Timing of CRS CRS Timing of CRS
100% 100%
Grade 1 Grade 2 Grade 3 Grade 4 Grade 1 Grade 2 Grade 3 Grade 4
90% 90%
80% 80%
63% C1
70% 70%
1%
60% 50% 60% 3% 54.5%
50% 50% 12%
3%
3%
40% 15% 13% 40% 30.4%
26.8%
30% 30%
47%
20% 20%
32% 2% 27% 2.0%
10% 1% 1% 2% 10% 0.9%
5% 10% 4%
0% 2% 0%
Overall Priming Inter 1st full 2nd full 3rd full+ Overall C1D8-14 C1D15-21 C2 C3 C4+
N=157 N=154
Time to onset from 1st full dose: 20 h Time to onset from C1D8: 13.6 h
Time to resolution: 2 days Time to resolution: --
Day 1 Steroids
Obinutuzumab and (IV)
prophylaxis
(steroids given with 20%
2.5 mg dose 30 mg dose onward Tocilizumab
Glofit first Obin dose)
Utilization
Obin Pre-Treatment: 10 mg dose
• long admin time
• ~20% Grade ≥3 AEs CRS Onset Legend Patient Potentially Hospitalized
Patient Hospitalized
(median onset 14 hours after
first step up dose – C1D8)
Differences
CRS, cytokine release syndrome. Adapted from Kotch C, et al. Expert Rev Clin Immunol. 2019;15(8):813–822.
CRS graded according to ASTCT consensus criteria
WITH EITHER
Requiring 1 Requiring ≥ 2
Not requiring
Hypotension None vasopressor vasopressors,
vasopressors
(± vasopressin) excluding vasopressin
AND/OR
Requiring high-flow
Requiring low‑flow Requiring positive
Hypoxia †
None facemask, NC, NRB
oxygen pressure ventilation
mask, or Venturi mask
CRS grade is determined by the more severe event: hypotension or hypoxia not attributable to any other cause ‡
*Fever is defined as temperature ≥ 38°C not attributable to any other cause, with or without constitutional symptoms (e.g., myalgia, arthralgia, malaise). In patients who have CRS receiving antipyretics,
anti-cytokine therapy, and/or corticosteroids, fever is no longer required to grade subsequent CRS severity. In this case, CRS grading is driven by hypotension and/or hypoxia.
†Low-flow nasal cannula is defined as oxygen delivered at ≤6 L/minute. Low flow also includes blow-by oxygen delivery, sometimes used in pediatrics. High-flow nasal cannula is defined as oxygen
delivered at >6 L/minute. Intubation of a patient without hypoxia for the possible neurologic compromise of a patent airway alone or for a procedure is not by definition grade 4 CRS.
‡For example, a patient with temperature of 39.5°C, hypotension requiring 1 vasopressor, and hypoxia requiring low-flow nasal cannula is classified as grade 3 CRS. Both systolic blood pressure (SBP)
and mean arterial pressure (MAP) are acceptable for blood pressure measurement. No specific limits are required, but hypotension should be determined on a case-by-case basis, accounting for age
and the patient’s individual baseline, i.e., a blood pressure that is below the normal expected for an individual in a given environment.
ASCTC, American society for transplantation and cellular therapy; CRS, cytokine release syndrome; NC, nasal cannula; NRB, non‐rebreather.
Adapted from Lee DW, et al. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2019;25:625-638.
CRS with CAR T and bispecific antibody therapies
100% 93% CAR T BsAbs
Patients with CRS, % 80%
58% 63%
60%
55% 50%
42%
40%
20%
0%
Axi-cel Liso-cel Tisa-cel Odronextamab Glofitamab Epcoritamab
Antipyretic + Antihistamine +
Antipyretic + Antihistamine
Prophylaxis Corticosteroid + Step-up Dosing
+ Corticosteroid* - - - + obinutuzumab -
Time to Onset,
CRS
Time to Resolution,
6 5 7 2 1.3 2
median (days)
Disclaimer: Caution must be taken with cross-trial comparisons due to differences in treatment protocols and patient populations – as such, these comparisons are illustrative only.
Consider the use of prophylactic corticosteroid in patients after weighing the potential benefits and risks.
Axi-cel, axicabtagene ciloleucel; CAR T, chimeric antigen receptor T-cell; CRS, cytokine release syndrome; Liso-cel, lisocabtagene maraleucel; Tisa-cel, Tisagenlecleucel.
Adapted from: 1. Thieblemont C, et al. J Clin Oncol. 2022:JCO2201725. 2. Kim SW, et al. Oral 444. ASH. Dec. 9-13, 2022. 3. Dickinson MJ, et al. N Engl J Med. 2022;387(24):2220-2231.
4. Neelapu. N Engl J Med. 2017. 5. Abramson JS, et al. Lancet. 2020;396(10254):839-8523. 6. Shuster SJ, et al. N Engl J Med. 2019;380(1):45-56.
General CRS Prevention and Treatment Measures
Prevention Treatment
Priming dose
+ Corticosteroids &
antipyretic premedication
Interrupt treatment
+ Anticytokine therapy
and/or corticosteroids
• Mitigation strategies to reduce severe CRS are commonly • Mild grade 1 CRS is managed with supportive therapy including
used with bsAbs infusion discontinuation, IV fluids, antipyretics and antihistamines
• Step-up dosing reduces the risk of severe CRS • Tocilizumab, an anti IL-6 monoclonal antibody, is the mainstay of
• Premedications are regularly employed with steroids, treatment for grade 2 or higher CRS
antihistamines and acetaminophen or paracetamol Tocilizumab does not efficiently penetrate the blood–brain
barrier and so corticosteroids are used in cases with
significant neurotoxicity or co-existing ICANS
Alternative options to tocilizumab, such as siltuximab and
anakinra, are also available
CRS management aims to prevent life-threatening toxicity while sustaining the antitumor effects of the immunotherapy.
3rd epco Day 15* prednisolone 100 mg IV or PO diphenhydramine 50 mg IV or PO acetaminophen 650 to 1000 mg PO
administration
(full dose) Days 16-18 prednisolone 100 mg IV or PO
4th epco Day 22* prednisolone 100 mg IV or PO diphenhydramine 50 mg IV or PO acetaminophen 650 to 1000 mg PO
administration
(full dose) Days 23-25 prednisolone 100 mg IV or PO
Cycle 2+
If CRS ≥ grade 2 occurs following the 4th epcoritamab optional, based on whether prior injection optional, based on whether prior
epco Day 29* reactions observed injection reactions observed
administration, 4-day consecutive corticosteroids must also be
administration
repeated for CRS prophylaxis with each epcoritamab dose, until 1 full
(full dose) Day 30-32
dose is administered without subsequent occurrence of CRS grade ≥2.
Premedication with corticosteroids, antihistamines, and antipyretics are mandatory during cycle 1,
and optional during cycle 2 unless CRS grade ≥2 occurs.
*GCT3013-01 and -05: 30 minutes to 2 hours prior to administration of epcoritamab; GCT3013-02: Prior to administration of epcoritamab. †Or dose equivalent.
‡GCT3013-01 and -05: corticosteroids may be reduced to 80 mg to mitigate possible side effects from high dose steroid administration.
IV=Intravenous. PO=Oral. GCT3013-01, GCT3013-02, GCT3013-05 Protocol.
CRS Grading and Management Guidance
1 Assess for CRS and grade according to ASTCT consensus criteria
SYMPTOMS* GRADE 1 GRADE 2 GRADE 3 GRADE 4
Fever Temperature ≥ 38°C Temperature ≥ 38°C Temperature ≥ 38°C Temperature ≥ 38°C
WITH EITHER
Requiring 1 vasopressor Requiring ≥ 2 vasopressors,
Hypotension None Not requiring vasopressors
(± vasopressin) excluding vasopressin
AND/OR
Requiring high-flow facemask, NC, Requiring positive pressure
Hypoxia None Requiring low‑flow oxygen
NRB mask, or Venturi mask ventilation
*CRS grade is determined by the more severe event: hypotension or hypoxia not attributable to any other cause
2 Manage according to CRS grade
Hold
EPCORITAMAB Hold Hold Discontinue if lasts >72h or Discontinue
if 2 events
SUPPORTIVE CARE Provide supportive care such as antipyretics and intravenous hydration
Consider Recommend:
ANTICYTOKINE THERAPY Tocilizumab† 8 mg/kg IV over 1h (not to exceed 800 mg)‡
†In case of concurrent ICANS/neurotoxicity, Tocilizumab †
choose alternative to tociluzumab in certain cases# If CRS is refractory:
Alternative immunosuppressants
TEPKINLY® (epcoritamab).
‡Repeat after at least 8h as needed, max 2 doses in 24h. #Advanced age, high tumour burden, circulating tumour cells, fever refractory to antipyretics Gulf SmPC, Sept 2023.
ICANS Identification & Management
ICANS Pathophysiology
1 Tumor Environment
ICANS may start with the production
1 2 3
of pro-inflammatory cytokines and
the activation of bystander immune
cells in the tumor microenvironment
2 Blood Stream
Inflammatory cytokines diffuse into
the blood stream and result in
disruption of the BBB
3 CNS
Cytokines can then cross the BBB
causing deleterious activation of
microglia and subsequent neuronal
damage
Despite the clinical features of ICANS being readily recognizable, its pathophysiology remains poorly understood; however,
pro-inflammatory cytokines, disrupted blood brain barrier, and neuronal injury are all implicated in the syndrome.
ICANS typically develops within 10 days of immune therapy usually occurring in the context of CRS;
however, CRS is not required for ICANS and the syndromes can occur independently. 3
Adapted from: 1. Lee DW, et al. Biology of Blood and Marrow Transplantation. 2019;25(4):625-38.
2. Santomasso BD, et al. Cancer discovery. 2018;8(8):958-71.
CRS, cytokine release syndrome; ICANS, immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome. 3. UpToDate: ICANS - accessed February 2022.
ICANS graded according to ASTCT consensus criteria
Patients are graded 1 to 4 according to the most severe symptom attributable to ICANS in five domains.
DOMAIN GRADE 1 GRADE 2 GRADE 3 GRADE 4
ICE score 0 (patient unable to
ICE score* ICE score 7 – 9 ICE score 3 – 6 ICE score 0 – 2
perform ICE)
Unarousable, requires vigorous,
Level of
Awakens spontaneously Awakens to voice Awakens only to tactile stimuli or repetitive tactile stimuli to
consciousness
arouse
Clinical seizure that resolves Life-threatening prolonged seizure
rapidly or non-convulsive seizures or repetitive clinical or electrical
Seizure
on EEG that resolve with seizures without return to baseline
intervention in between
Diffuse cerebral edema,
decerebrate or decorticate
ICP / cerebral edema Focal / local edema
posturing, cranial nerve VI palsy,
papilledema, Cushing’s triad
Deep focal motor weakness such
Motor findings
as hemiparesis or paraparesis
Naming Ability to name 3 objects (eg, point to clock, pen, button) 3 points
Following commands Ability to follow simple commands (eg, “show me 2 fingers” or “close your eyes and stick out your tongue”) 1 point
ASCTC, American society for transplantation and cellular therapy; ICANS, immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome; Adapted from
ICE, impact, confidence, ease; ICP, intercranial pressure. Lee DW, et al. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2019;25:625-638.
ICANS with CAR T and bispecific antibody therapies
CAR T BsAbs
Patients with ICANS, % 100%
80%
64%
60%
40% 30%
21%
20%
3% 8% 6%
0%
Axi-cel Liso-cel Tisa-cel Odronextamab Glofitamab Epcoritamab
Time to Onset,
9 9 6 Not reported Not reported Not reported
median (days)
Time to Resolution,
7 11 14 Not reported Not reported Not reported
median
Disclaimer: (days)
Caution must be taken with cross-trial comparisons due to differences in treatment protocols and patient populations – as such, these comparisons are illustrative only.
*For grade 4 ICANS.
Axi-cel, axicabtagene ciloleucel; CAR T, chimeric antigen receptor T-cell; ICANS, immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome; Liso-cel, lisocabtagene maraleucel; Tisa-cel, Tisagenlecleucel.
Adapted from: 1. Thieblemont C, et al. J Clin Oncol. 2022:JCO2201725. 2. Kim SW, et al. Oral 444. ASH. Dec. 9-13, 2022. 3. Dickinson MJ, et al. N Engl J Med. 2022;387(24):2220-2231.
4. Neelapu. N Engl J Med. 2017. 5. Abramson JS, et al. Lancet. 2020;396(10254):839-8523. 6. Shuster SJ, et al. N Engl J Med. 2019;380(1):45-56.
ICANS Treatment
Typical treatment
Glucocorticoids Antiseizure medication
+
• Glucocorticoids are an important component in the supportive • Patients with ICANS are at increased risk for seizures
management of ICANS; however, the optimal timing, dosing, and
• Antiseizure medication should be given to most patients with
duration are not established
suspected ICANS at initial presentation with neurologic symptoms.
• Treatment decisions are often influenced by concomitant CRS
• Prophylactic therapy is also reasonable for patients deemed at
• Administration should begin in grade ≥ 2 ICANS high risk for seizures
Other considerations
Refractory edema Tocilizumab Investigational therapies
• Novel approaches to block inflammatory
• Refractory cerebral edema with acutely • In patients with ICANS who do not have
cytokines are under investigation, including:
increasing intracranial pressure (ICP) is a concurrent CRS, there is no role
neurologic emergency for tocilizumab IL-6 blockade with siltuximab
• If edema progresses rapidly despite steroids, • For patients with moderate to severe CRS IL-1 blockade with anakinra
patients require aggressive osmotic with or without ICANS, tocilizumab + GM-CSF neutralization with lenzilumab
therapies to lower ICP glucocorticoids is typically given
Treatment of ICANS is supportive and consists primarily of glucocorticoids and antiseizure therapy.
CRS=Cytokine Release Syndrome. ICANS=Immune Effector Cell-Associated Neurotoxicity Syndrome. ICP=Intracranial Pressure.
UpToDate: ICANS - accessed February 2022.
Epcoritamab Guidance for ICANS Management Based on ASTCT Guidelines
and/
Supportive Care Anticytokine Therapy or Corticosteroids
and/
Supportive Care Anticytokine Therapy or Corticosteroids
Closely monitor neurologic status with serial neurologic exams • Anakinra 100 mg or 200 mg SC
to include fundoscopy and consider neurology consult per day (100 mg every 12 h) until
resolution of neurotoxicity
Prophylactic non-sedating anti-seizure medication until • Siltuximab 11 mg/kg IV over 1
resolution of event hour, one time only
and/
Supportive Care Anticytokine Therapy or Corticosteroids
Continuous cardiac telemetry and pulse oximetry as indicated Please contact the study medical director for specific questions.
*In the GCT3013-01, -02, and -05 protocols, epcoritamab is permanently discontinued at the first episode of Grade 3 ICANS.
†In the M20-638 protocol, epcoritamab is held until resolution of the first episode of Grade 3 ICANS. For second episode, epcoritamab is permanently discontinued at the discretion of the investigator.
GCT3013-01, GCT3013-02, GCT3013-05, M20-638 Protocol.
Epcoritamab Initiation: Recommendations for ICANS Grading and Management
SUPPORTIVE CARE Consider non-sedating anti-seizure medication (eg, levetiracetam) until resolution of ICANS
CRS, cytokine release syndrome; ICANS, immune effector cell associated neurotoxicity syndrome; IV, intravenous; SC, subcutaneous.
TEPKINLY® (epcoritamab). Gulf Summary of Product Characteristics, Sept 2023.
Infection Management
Infections Overview
CAR T –cell therapy has on-target effects : CD19 CAR T –cells result in
depletion of B-cells and a subset of CD19+ plasma cells whereas
BCMA- targeted CAR T-cells lead to plasma cell aplasia. 1-2
References:
1.
2. Neelapu SS, Tummala S, Kebriaei P, Wierda W, Gutierrez C, Locke FL, et al. Chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy—assessment and management of toxicities. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2018;15:47–62.
Incidence of Infections in CAR-T cell Monotherapy Trials
The incidence of infections in patients receiving CD19 CAR T-cells varies from 18 to 56 % in prospective clinical trials and 20-60% in
retrospective analyses. The differences in incidence among different studies could be due to patient-related, drug-related factors and
duration of follow up.1
Incidence of infections in different pivotal clinical trials for CD-19 T-cell therapy
Fungal infections - - 10 -
Disclaimer: Caution must be taken with cross-trial comparisons due to differences in treatment 1. Wudhikarn, K. et al. Infections complications, immune reconstitution, and infection prophylaxis after CD19
protocols and patient populations – as such, these comparisons are illustrative only. No head-to- chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy. Bone Marrow Transplantation. 2022; 57:1477-1488.
head trials have been conducted assessing the comparative safety of these agents. 2. BREYANZI Prescribing Information. July 2022.
3. YESCARTA Prescribing Information. November 2022.
Incidence of infections in Bispecific Monotherapy Trials
1. Budde EL, et al. Abstract 1628. ASH Annual Meeting. Dec. 9-13, 2022
2. Philipps TJ, et al. Abstract 4251. ASH Annual Meeting. Dec 9-13, 2022
3. Rentsch V et al. Glofitamab Treatment in Relapsed or Refractory DLBCL after CAR T-cell Therapy. Cancers. 2022;14(2516)
Disclaimer: Caution must be taken with cross-trial comparisons due to differences in treatment
protocols and patient populations – as such, these comparisons are illustrative only. No head-to-
head trials have been conducted assessing the comparative safety of these agents.
ICANS Management Infections
• Most guidelines recommend initiating antibacterial prophylaxis during the severe neutropenia period with
absolute neutrophil counts (ANC) lower than 0.5 X 109/L and continue until ANC stays sustained above this level
Bacterial • Fluoroquinolones are most used, but extended-spectrum beta-lactam antibiotics or non-absorbable antibiotics
may be a reasonable alternative depending on the antibiotic sensitivity, allergy profiles and clinical practices at
each center.
• Prophylactic acyclovir is recommended for herpes viral prophylaxis. The duration varies between clinical centers,
but the most common one is at least 3-6 months after CAR-T treatment
Viral
• Patients who are hepatitis carriers or have previous history of hepatitis should receive treatment with entecavir
for at least 6 months along with surveillance for liver function
• Antifungal prophylaxis should be considered in patients with prolonged cytopenia or prolonged systemic
Fungal corticosteroid treatment for CAR T-cell associated events
1. Wudhikarn, K. et al. Infections complications, immune reconstitution, and infection prophylaxis after CD19 chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy. Bone Marrow Transplantation. 2022; 57:1477-1488
ICANS Management Infections