Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Reno Cardio Protection With Canagliflozin - Endo Perspective
Reno Cardio Protection With Canagliflozin - Endo Perspective
Canagliflozin
• Based on review of new data from three clinical trials, FDA has removed the Boxed
Warning about amputation risk from canagliflozin
• Since its initial approval, canagliflozin has gained additional indications
• 2018: To reduce the risk of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) in adults
with type 2 diabetes and established CV disease
• 2019: To reduce the risk of ESKD, doubling of serum creatinine, CV death, and
hospitalization for heart failure (HHF) in adults with type 2 diabetes and diabetic
nephropathy with albuminuria
https://www.fda.gov/drugs/drug-safety-and-availability/fda-removes-boxed-warning-about-risk-leg-and-foot-amputations-diabetes-medicine-canagliflozin
accessed on 27th August 2020
Significantly Enhanced Benefit of Canagliflozin
• FDA has acknowledged the significantly enhanced benefit of canagliflozin
• Safety information from recent clinical trials suggests that the risk of
amputation is lower than previously described
– Particularly when appropriately monitored
• Based upon these considerations, FDA has concluded that the Boxed
Warning should be removed
https://www.fda.gov/drugs/drug-safety-and-availability/fda-removes-boxed-warning-about-risk-leg-and-foot-amputations-diabetes-medicine-canagliflozin
accessed on 27th August 2020
Patient Profile
Case #
58 years old female, housewife
Sedentary lifestyle
K/C/O T2DM since 7 years & on OAD’s
H/O hypothyroidism since 10 years
Questionable adherence
Case : Clinical presentation & Examination
• Patient comes with c/o edema of both foot since last 6 months
Canagliflozin had highest reduction of 24.1% in FPG and 24.7% in PPG (p=0.001)
*p=0.002, compared to Dapagliflozin and Empagliflozin Vadgama J, Panikar V, Joshi SR, et al. Late Breaking Abstract #1137 presented at AACE 2017
Weight Control
Weight & Glycemic effects of Canagliflozin
as Add-On to Metformin in T2 DM
Mean change in A1C: Baseline to 12 week Mean change in body weight: Baseline to 12 week
Canagliflozin significantly improved glycemic control & weight loss even with 50 mg dose.
Rosenstock J et al. DIABETES CARE, VOLUME 35, JUNE 2012
Fat loss at various
tissues
≥90 D DECLARE 85 13
C CANVAS Program 76 12
(mL/min/1.73 m2)
D
GFR categories
60-90 C E
E EMPA-REG OUTCOME 74 18
45-59 CREDENCE 56 927
30-44
Sustained RRT Events
<30
DECLARE Not reported
CANVAS Program 18
Low
Moderately High Very high EMPA-REG OUTCOME 11
increased
CREDENCE 176
CREDENCE: 30% reduction of Primary Outcome
(ESKD, Doubling of Serum Creatinine, or Renal or CV Death)
Participants with an event (%) 25
Hazard ratio, 0.70 (95% CI, 0.59–0.82) 340 participants
Participants with an event
P = 0.00001
20
245 participants
15
(%)
10
5 Placebo
Canagliflozin
0
0 26
6 52
12 78
18 104
24 130
30 156
36 182
42
Months since randomization
No. at risk
Placebo 2199 2178 2132 2047 1725 1129 621 170
Canagliflozin 2202 2181 2145 2081 1786 1211 646 196
-4
eGFR (mL/min/1.73
-6 –1.85/year
-8
-10
m2)
-12
–4.59/year
mean
0 26
6 52
12 78
18 104
24 130
30 156
36 182
42
Months since randomization
No. of Participants
Placebo 2178 2084 1985 1882 1720 1536 1006 583 210
Canagliflozin 2179 2074 2005 1919 1782 1648 1116 652 241
On treatment
30
20
10
eGFR < 10 mL/min/1.73 m2
0
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
Years
60 Average CREDENCE
50
patient
–1.8 Age = 63 years
40 –4 5/y eGFR = 56
.5 e
eGFR
30 9/ ar
20
ye
Average ar 15.1 years
patient would 10
delay develop eGFR < 10 mL/min/1.73 m2
0
eGFR 10 by 0 5 10 15 20 25 30
over 15 years Years
Placebo/SOC Canagliflozin
by taking Age = 73 years Age = 88 years
Canagliflozin eGFR = 10 eGFR = 10
Intraglomerular pressure
Glucose Albuminuria
BP/arterial
Oxidant stress
stiffness Intrarenal
Volume Natriuresis
angiotensinogen
upregulation
Inflammation/
fibrosis Renal
Improved oxygenation
Efficiency of substrate
autophagy utilization
Beneficial Effects of Canagliflozin on eGFR in Participants with Baseline eGFR <30
mL/min/1.73 m2
Canagliflozin Placebo 43.0% reduction in the rate of
Mean baseline, mL/min/1.73 m 2
26.3 26.5 eGFR decline with canagliflozin
35 from Week 3 to end of study
25
P = 0.003
20
15
10
Acute eGFR slope*
5 Difference: –0.88 mL/min/1.73 m2 (95% CI: –3.16, 1.39)
Chronic eGFR slope†
Difference: 2.54 mL/min/1.73 m2/year (95% CI: 0.9, 4.17)
0 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180
0 3 13 26 52 78 104 130 156 182
Weeks since randomization
Canagliflozin, n 82 82 77 78 71 57 50 36 22 7
Placebo, n 89 88 85 81 76 65 59 33 21 8
Favors Favors
Canagliflozin Placebo
22 28 43
MACE (CV Death, MI, or Stroke) reduction in DKD patients
Participants with an event (%) 25
Hazard ratio, 0.80 (95% CI, 0.67–0.95) Placebo
P = 0.01 Canagliflozin
20
20% Reduction
with Cana
269 participants
15
217 participants
10
0
0 26
6 52
12 78
18 104
24 130
30 156
36 182
42
Months since randomization
No. at risk
Placebo 2199 2152 2100 2022 1717 1143 635 168
Canagliflozin 2202 2163 2106 2047 1756 1196 642 198
Renal and CV Outcome Benefits in DKD patients
Hazard ratio
(95% CI) P value
Primary composite outcome 0.70 (0.59–0.82) 0.00001
Doubling of serum creatinine 0.60 (0.48–0.76) <0.001
ESKD 0.68 (0.54–0.86) 0.002
eGFR <15 mL/min/1.73 m2 0.60 (0.45–0.80) –
Dialysis initiated or kidney transplantation 0.74 (0.55–1.00) –
Renal death 0.39 (0.08–2.03) –
CV death 0.78 (0.61–1.00) 0.0502
CV death or hospitalization for heart failure 0.69 (0.57–0.83) <0.001
CV death, MI, or stroke 0.80 (0.67–0.95) 0.01
Hospitalization for heart failure 0.61 (0.47–0.80) <0.001
ESKD, doubling of serum creatinine, or renal death 0.66 (0.53–0.81) <0.001