Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Article Critiquing 2 For Research
Article Critiquing 2 For Research
Article Critiquing 2 For Research
PRESENTATION
MAJ NEETHU A
MSc (N) I YR.
(COMMUNITY HEALTH NURSING)
CON, CH (EC), KOLKATA
TITLE OF THE STUDY
• T2DM
• Diabetic Yoga Protocol
• IDRS
• Diagnosis
• DYP
INTRODUCTION
• As per the International Diabetes Federation (IDF), the number of people with Type
2 Diabetes (DM) is increasing in each country.
• The Indian Diabetes Risk Score (IDRS), has been emerged as a simple screening tool
for prediction of undiagnosed DM
• Derived from the Chennai Urban Rural Epidemiology Population Study (CURES)
• Validated using the data from the Chennai Urban Population Study.
INTRODUCTION
• Tool
• Indian Diabetes
Risk Score(IDRS)
Min score : 0
Max score : 100
High risk : greater than or equal to 60
Moderate risk : 30 to 50
Low risk : 0 to 30
OBJECTIVE
• To assess the prevalence of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in selected Indian
population
• To assess the risk factors associated with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in selected
Indian population.
• To assess the association of Indian Diabetic risk score (IDRS) and risk factors of
Exclusion criteria
• Not given
.
SAMPLING
• Steps
• Population of 4000/district (50 % rural & 50% urban)were screened in the first phase
Table 3: The highest %(33 %) of high risk population was in Northwest zone (Jammu)
The least % (15 %) was in East zone
Subjects of urban areas were at high risk than the rural areas.
RESULTS
Table 4: Majority of the known DM Subjects were found in high risk group (78.1%)
Nort Western region(62.9) has the highest prevalence followed by South India(55 % )( urban)
North Indian rural region has the highest prevalence of DM subjects (50.1 %)
RESULTS
Highest no of population under high risk falls under the age group 50 to 59
Lowest no falls under the age group < 20
RESULTS
RESULTS
Prediction of self
reported diabetes
through IDRS was found
to be positively
significantly associated
with
odds ratios 1.782 & 2.686
DISCUSSION
• IDRS score distribution showed higher prevalence of DM patients falling into
high risk group. >50 cut off youden index showed the sensitivity of 78.05 and
specificity of 62.68 which approves the utility of IDRS as a cost effective tool.
IDRS tool based on this study findings have public health implications.
Moreover method can be utilized by the practicing clinicians in early
diagnosis of DM.
FUNDING
• This research was funded by Central Council for Research in Yoga and
016-17/CCRYN/RES/Y&D/MCT/Dated: 15.12.2016).
AKNOWLEDGEMENT
The authors acknowledged Ministry of AYUSH,Govt of India, NewDelhi, for
funding this project. They also acknowledged support of CCRYN for
manpower, MOHFW for supporting the cost of investigations and IYA for the
overall project implementation. They also thanked the advisory research
committee, senior research fellows, Mr Sabzar, Dr Sanjay, Ms Radhika, Dr
Sunanda Rathi, Yoga volunteers and the President of Indian Yoga Association
for their contribution in this project.
NEW LEARNING
• STRATIFIED TRANSALATIONAL RESEARCH
• Ratio of the number of people with the event to the number without.
• Youden’s Index
• Youden's J statistic (also called Youden's index) is a single statistic that captures
the performance of a dichotomous diagnostic test
NEW LEARNING
The diagnostic test is 75 %
accurate in detecting the
proportion of patients
with positive test results
&
55 %
NEW LEARNING
• Youden Index
• with 0 values indicating that a diagnostic test gives the same proportion of
positive results for groups with and without the disease.