Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Environmental Economics
Environmental Economics
Market Failure
Market failure occurs if the functioning of a perfect market
is compromised; hence, it is unable to efficiently allocate
scarce resources at a given price as conditions for laws of
demand and supply are not met.
An example can be an environmental good such as clean
oceans. It is difficult to price the value of clean seas and
oceans, and there exist no markets for clean water bodies
where it is traded depending on the degree of cleanliness. It
is a standard case of market failure.
Contd…
Externalities
Externalities are inadvertent consequences of economic
activity that affect people over and above those directly
involved in it. Externalities are also another form of
market failure. They can either be negative or positive.
A negative externality creates unplanned outcomes that
are harmful to the environment or directly to the general
public. An example can be pollution through industrial
production, which results in unclean air and water and
other health risks. The polluting entities may not incur
any costs to address the pollution, even though their
activities harm the environment and negatively affect the
surrounding community.
Contd…
Valuation
Valuation is an important aspect of environmental
economics, as it helps to evaluate a variety of options in
managing challenges with the use of environmental and
natural resources. The valuation of ecological resources
is a complex process, as it is difficult to assign value to
intangible benefits, such as clean air and an unpolluted
environment.
Resources that offer multiple benefits are difficult to
value – for example, mountains may prevent flooding,
provide scenic beauty, direct river flow patterns, and
provide fertile soils for agriculture.
Contd..
Hedonic Pricing
A hedonic pricing model is often used to estimate
quantitative values for environmental or ecosystem
services that directly affect market prices for homes.
This method of valuation can require a strong degree of
statistical expertise and model specification, following a
period of data collection.
The hedonic approach to economic assessment can be
used for evaluating the economic value of environmental
goods such as noise, air or water quality, landscape and
similar goods
Contd.
Cost-Benefit Analysis
Cost-benefit analysis (CBA) involves weighing the benefits arising
from a policy against the perceived benefits. Hence, the best policy
is one in which there is the greatest surplus of benefits over costs.
CBA starts with a base policy where no changes are made to the
status quo. A time horizon is selected where the perceived costs and
benefits are expected to be realized. Benefits are instances where
human well-being is improved, and costs decrease human well-
being.
Advantages
Provide policy makers with simple common-sense
approach to evaluating actions
It allows for greater protection of the consumer and
environment
it requires decision-makers to explain the rationale
behind their decisions, to quantify the risks, and to
provide objective information.
Allows government to create appropriate plans of
action giving good information
Allows regulators the chance to examine the far
reaching effects of proposed action prior to that action
being undertaken
DISADVANTAGES
Blocking innovation and progress generally because
applications of strong formulations of the principle can be
used to block innovation, a technology which brings
advantages may be banned by PP because of its potential
for negative impacts, leaving the positive benefits
unrealized
Internal inconsistency – (applying strong PP risks causing
harm)
Vagueness and plausibility
Given the increased rate of regulatory demands for prove of
limited to no risk, many health related products may be kept
from market.
The principle does not stand firmly on its own but would
function best when coupled with the sustainability approach
CONCLUSION
Though this principle has a lot of advantages and
seeks to protect the interest of the public, it also
generates internal inconsistency and therefore
applying the principle in absolute terms actually
contradicts the principle in its self.
POLLUTER PAYS PRINCIPLE
It is a principle in the international environmental law
where the polluter pays for damage done to the natural
environment. It is also known as the extended polluter
responsibility. Whoever is responsible for damage to
the environment should bear the cost associated with it.
Its purpose seeks to shift the responsibility in dealing
with waste from governments to the entities producing
it.
burden of proof
The burden of proof lies on the environmental
regulators
A straight forward interpretation of the polluter pays
principle would suggest that if the consumption or
production activities of one group of consumers or
producers have harmful effects on others then the
perpetrators of the harms should be held liable for the
damages.
A simple example is tax on petrol, when consuming
petrol we create pollution so the tax means the price
will pay more closely reflect the social cost.
ADVANTAGES
It is a simple extension of the principle of fairness
and justice
It enhance economic efficiency that is it helps to
protect the environment without sacrificing the
efficiency of a free market economic system
The additional revenues are used to cut payroll,
income and corporate taxes
Revenues collected can help to achieve other social
goals
It is a way of internalizing externalities
DISADVANTAGES …
Ambiguity still exists in determining ‘who is a
polluter’
It can be difficult to measure how much pollution is
produced e.g. firms may hide the extent of their pollution
A large number of poor households, informal sector
firms, and subsistence farmers cannot bear any
additional charges for energy or for waste disposal.
Small and medium-size firms from the formal sector,
which mainly serve the home market, find it difficult to
pass on higher costs to the domestic end-users of their
products.
Contd…