Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Psychological Impact of Victimization
Psychological Impact of Victimization
IMPACT OF
VICTIMIZATION
Victimization
• Physical impact- physical injuries may be minor, moderate and major depending on the crime committed. Even
after the physical injuries are healed other physical effects of pain and discomfort continue to subsist. Some
victims are rendered incapable of leading a normal lifestyle following victimization.
• Financial impact- the financial impact on the victims may be in the form of costs and expenses in medical
treatment, damages to the property, litigation expenses, loss of earnings, etc.
RISE OF VICTIM RIGHTS
• The basic principles formulated for justice for crime victims under UN declaration (1985) identified the
following areas:
Access to justice and fair treatment- Victims should be treated with compassion and respect for their dignity. They
are entitled to access to the mechanisms of justice and to prompt redress, as provided for by national legislation, for
the harm that they have suffered.
Restitution-Offenders or third parties responsible for their behaviour should, where appropriate, make fair restitution
to victims, their families or dependants. Such restitution should include the return of property or payment for the harm
or loss suffered, reimbursement of expenses incurred as a result of the victimization, the provision of services and the
restoration of rights.
Compensation-When compensation is not fully available from the offender or other sources, States should endeavour
to provide financial compensation.
Assistance- Victims should receive the necessary material, medical, psychological and social assistance through
governmental, voluntary, community-based and indigenous means.
JUDICIAL INTERPRETATION.
• Rattan Singh v. State of Punjab- wherein it was observed that “It is a weakness of our
jurisprudence that victims of crime and the distress of the dependents of the victim do not
attract the attention of law. In fact the victim reparation is still the vanishing point of our
criminal law. This is the deficiency in the system, which must be rectified by
the legislature.”
• In case of R.D Upadhyaya v. State of Andhra Pradesh- the court issued certain
guidelines to ensure that certain minimum standards are observed with regard of women
prisoners. As they born out of a certain unfortunate situation, they should not be treated
with disgrace and for thus court started to focus on psychological aspects of the women
prisoners as well as victim.
RECOMMENDATION
• States should look at plights of victims with more sympathy and ensure
rehabilitation of victims through means of restorative justice.
• States should take responsibility with regard to compensation of victims of
crime and should not avoid their responsibility in pretext of economic
constraint.
• From investigation to conviction, the criminal justice system should
operate in a way which does not further traumatize victims or aggravate
their emotional pain.
• States should enact clear laws in regards to victim rights and
victim compensation.
CONCLUSION
Small steps can go a long way in such cases. Journaling is one such step that can be initiated by a victim.
Spending time around loved ones might also help in dealing with symptoms. Re-establishing a normal routine,
taking up tasks, and exercising are all ways in which a victim can deal with trauma. However, victims must
avoid engaging in self-harming activities for relief, such consumption of alcohol. It is also of utmost priority
that victims don’t engage in self-blame, which will undoubtedly deteriorate their mental health condition. In
this way the society can combat with the issue of victimization and it's effect on victims and can restore
back to normal life.