SAMPLE SUMMATIVE MATRIX

Title: Grammatical Competence and Writing

Performances of Student-journalists

Researchers: Datu, Ivan P., Colorado, John Carlo M.,

Matias, Therese Ericka Mei M.
 DEFENSE PRAYER
Our Heavenly Father, the source of love and wisdom
We praise and thank You for the countless gifts
You generously shower upon us.
We thank you for the strength, the will, and the inspiration to work on this
research
Aside from the educational competence we gained
We learned the value of perseverance, cooperation, and diligence
We humbly offer You this piece of work,
Let it be an expression of our desire to grow not only in knowledge, but
more in wisdom.
May we imitate the examples of St. John Baptist
Who in all humility, remained faithful and attributed everything to You.
In Jesus name we pray
AMEN
SOP
Research Methods
 Findings,
Conclusions
and
Recommendations
 Problem Hypothesis Findings Conclusion Recommendations

1. What is the 1. Based on results from 1. Majority of 1. The researchers

grammatical the data the outcomes the recommend that the
competence of upper intermediate respondents’ respondents should
the student – obtained the 1st rank with are focus on both
journalists? a percentage of 48.48%.. grammatical variables. To do this,
Next in the rank is the competent. school paper advisers
outcome intermediate of the Campsite
which has a percentage of publication should
24.24%. The outcome conduct a more
Advanced obtained the 3rd intensive training that
rank with a percentage of tests the student-
21.21%. Next in the rank journalists’ grammar
are the high level series and way of writing to
and the outcome pre- achieve a more
intermediate which tied at desirable result. The
4th rank with a percentage advisers may conduct
of 3.03%. Lastly, the workshops per
outcome elementary quarter and not only
denotes that there is no for competition
student-journalist fall purposes.
under elementary level.
 Problem Hypothesis Findings Conclusion Recommendations

2. How may their 2. Based on the essays 2. The 2. The school

writing that they made that was student- administrators like
performances be rated by the English journalists the School Head
described along the experts, the focus and have low may want to
following: details ranked 1st with a writing provide capacity-
2.1 focus and mean of 2.30 this denotes performance. building activities
details; that out of the four traits, that would
2.2 organization; it is in the focus and strengthen both
2.3 voice; and details that the grammatical and
2.4 word choice? respondents came the writing
highest. However, in the competences
verbal description, the through offering
mean 2.30 fall under summer trainings
“Low” rating which for the continuous
means that the score that growth and
they got is still low. improvement of
Ranking in 2nd is Word the student-
Choice with a mean of journalists to
2.26. Followed by Voice produce a quality
that got a mean of 2.23. journalistic
Lastly, Organization that outputs.
obtained a mean of 2.19.
 Problem Hypothesis Findings Conclusion Recommendations

3. Is there a 3. There is 3. The correlation of focus 3. There is no 3. The future

significant no & details to the significant researchers may
relationship significant grammatical competence relationship want to change the
between the relationship reveals that the Multiple R between the instrument used in
grammatical between the is 0.06 and the respondents’ evaluating the
competence and grammatical significance is 0.75. Next grammatical writing
writing competence in line is the correlation of competence performance of the
performances of and writing organization to the and writing students. They
student- performance grammatical competence performance. may want to use
journalists? of student- and it shows that the the outputs that the
journalists. multiple r is 0.10 and the student-journalists
significance is 0.68. Next have produced
is the correlation of the when the
voice to the grammatical respondents had
competence that shows their trainings
the multiple r is at 0.10 instead of giving
and the significance is the respondents
0.57. Lastly, the one topic to write.
correlation of word choice
to the grammatical reveals
that the multiple r is at
0.08 and the significance
is at 0.64.
 Problem Hypothesis Findings Conclusion Recommendations

4. What are the 4. Based on the result 4. The results 4. The student-
implications of of the study, it was have journalists may
the study to shown that there is no implications want to consider
Journalism and significance between to the study attending summer
trainings for
English grammatical of aspiring young
language competence and writing Journalism journalists to
learning? performance of student- and English sharpen their
journalists. The results language skills. The
revealed that the learning. respondents may
respondents obtained a also want to read
very low degree of newspapers more
relationship in their often to gain
Outcomes Placement knowledge about
contents that they
Test and in their overall should incorporate
writing performance, in their outputs
which shows that there and even how to
is no significance construct
among the two sentences and
variables. paragraphs.