Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 77

Event: Internship Presentation- Review 1

Date: 20-MARCH- 2024


Venue: CHRIST (Deemed to be University)
Programme: MTech
Batch: 2024
Deanery: School of Engineering and Technology
Department: Civil Engineering
Proposed Title: “Analysis and Design of multistorey building”

Supervisor
Candidate Dr. Aniket Bhalkikar
Name : Arjun M P Assistant Professor
Reg Num : 2267307 Er. Amir Suhail PT
Structural Engineer

MISSION VISION CORE VALUES


CHRIST is a nurturing ground for an individual’s Excellence and Service Faith in God | Moral Uprightness
holistic development to make effective contribution to Love of Fellow Beings
the society in a dynamic environment Social Responsibility | Pursuit of Excellence
CONTENTS
 Introduction about Company
 Introduction about Project
 Objectives of the Project
 Structural Plan and Structural Specification
 Load cases & Load combinations
 Modelling using STAAD.Pro software
 Results and Discussions
 References

MISSION VISION CORE VALUES


CHRIST is a nurturing ground for an individual’s Excellence and Service Faith in God | Moral Uprightness
holistic development to make effective contribution to Love of Fellow Beings
the society in a dynamic environment Social Responsibility | Pursuit of Excellence
CHRIST
Deemed to be University

1. INTRODUCTION

Company Profile

Company : Spanit Building Innovations


Directors : Er. Fuhad Saneen EP & Er. Salman Faris

• Spanit Building Innovations is one of leading company in design and construction in


Kerala.
• They are located in, Kozhikode, India
• They specialize in high-quality construction and innovative designs.
• The company handled various projects like Residential ,commercial ,Religious
buildings and recreational facilities.
• Website :https://www.spanit.in/.

Excellence and Service S1


CHRIST
Deemed to be University

2. MAJOR PROJECTS OF SPANIT BUILDING


INNOVATIONS

Fig 2.1 : Residential Project Fig 2.2 : Project by Lulu Group


Site : Vadakkanad Site : Kozhikode
Area :18000sqrft Area :20000sqrft

Excellence and Service S4


CHRIST
Deemed to be University

2. MAJOR PROJECTS OF SPANIT BUILDING


INNOVATIONS

Fig 2.3 : Educational Project Fig 2.4 : Residential Project


Site : Kozhikode Site : Kozhikode
Area :15000sqrft Area :10000sqrft

Excellence and Service S5


CHRIST
Deemed to be University

OBJECTIVES
1. To develop the proficiency in structural design software such as Autocad,
Staad. Pro

2. Learn concept of loading on building and calculation of steel requirement

3. To gain design knowledge on various elements like beams, columns , slabs


etc.

4. Analyze the building behavior when subjected to seismic forces and wind
forces.

5. To manually design the building using IS13920 :1993 and compare with
software result.

6. To get exposure of practical knowledge and skills by involving in ongoing


projects under the guidance of experienced professionals

Excellence and Service S5


CHRIST
Deemed to be University

3. ACTIVITIES PERFORMED

1. Modelling of structure

2. Calculation of loads

3. Designing of structural elements.

4. Preparations of structural drawings

5. Site inspection.

Excellence and Service S2


CHRIST
Deemed to be University

4. ANALYIS PROCEDURE USING STAAD PRO

Define and assign material


Building Plan Modelling
and geometry property

Prepare the structural Apply load and load


Run the analysis
drawings combination

Excellence and Service S3


CHRIST
Deemed to be University

4. ANALYIS PROCEDURE USING STAAD PRO


BUILDING PLAN
• Building plan will provide from Architecture or client side.
• Draw the central line that connects beams and column using
AutoCAD.
• Import to Staad.pro

MODEL THE PLAN


• Model the plan using Staad pro

DEFINE & ASSIGN MATERIAL AND GEOMETRY PROPERTY


• Specify material property for each element.
• Define and assign beams and columns dimension.

ASSIGN LOAD AND LOAD COMBINATION


Loads to be considered
1. Live load 3. Water load 5.Floor Finish
2. Dead load 4. Staircase load
Excellence and Service S3
CHRIST
Deemed to be University

4. ANALYIS PROCEDURE USING STAAD PRO


Load combination
1.Nonfactored load
2.Factored load

RUN ANALYSIS
Check whether beams and column failure, if there is failure increase the
dimensions.

PREPARE THE STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS


Footing detail, column detail, Beams detail, Slab detail and Staircase detail.

Excellence and Service S3


CHRIST
Deemed to be University

5. INTRODUCTION TO PROJECT

Fig 5.01:Ground floor

Excellence and Service S6


CHRIST
Deemed to be University

5. INTRODUCTION TO PROJECT

Fig 5.02:First floor

Excellence and Service S6


CHRIST
Deemed to be University

5. INTRODUCTION TO PROJECT

Fig 5.03:Second,Third,Fourth and Fifth floors

Excellence and Service S6


CHRIST
Deemed to be University

5. INTRODUCTION TO PROJECT

Fig 5.04:Elevation

Excellence and Service S6


CHRIST
Deemed to be University

5. INTRODUCTION TO PROJECT

Fig 5.05:Rendered image from staad.pro

Excellence and Service S7


CHRIST
Deemed to be University

5.1. PROJECT DETAILS


The proposed building is G+5 storied RC multistoried building
Site location: Kozhikode
Area of the project : 2964m2
Grade of concrete: M20
Grade of steel = Fe 415
Density of concrete = 25kN/M2
Density of brick = 19kN/M2
Columns
1. 300 x 400mm
2. 300 x 600mm
Beams
1. 200 x 400mm
2. 200 x 420mm
3. 200 x 500mm
Slab thickness = 120mm
Shear wall thickness = 200mm

Excellence and Service S7


CHRIST
Deemed to be University

5.1. PROJECT DETAILS


Load calculation

1.Dead load

Dead loads are calculated as per IS 875 : 1987(Part 1)

Wall load = 2.75 x 19 x .23 = 12.01kN/m2 ( wall on beam 200x400mm)


2.73 x 19 x .23 = 11.91kN/m2 ( wall on beam 200x420mm)
2.65 x 19 x .23 = 11.585kN/m2 ( wall on beam 200x420mm)

Slab load = .120 x 25 = 3kN/m2


Floor finish = 1kN/m2

Total load = 4kN/m2

Excellence and Service S7


CHRIST
Deemed to be University

5.1. PROJECT DETAILS


Load calculation

2. Live Load is taken as per IS875:1987(Part-2)

Table 5.1: live loads


SL.NO Occupancy UDL
classification
1 Rooms 2kN/m2

2 Corridor, Passages, 3kN/m2


staircase
3 Toilet 2kN/m2

Excellence and Service S7


CHRIST
Deemed to be University

5.1. PROJECT DETAILS


Load calculation

3. Wind loads
Wind loads are calculated as per IS1875: 2016(part 3)
Vz = Vb x k 1 x k 2 x k 3
Vb = 39m/s(Wind speed)
k1 = 1 ( Probability factor)
Table 5.1: Wind loads
Height (m) K2 Vz
k3 = 1
10 .80 31.2
k2 = .80
Caterory 2 12.6 .80 31.2

 class A 15.75 .80 31.2

18.15 .80 31.2


Design wind pressure 20.18 .80 31.2
Pz = 0.6x31.22
= .584kN/m2
Excellence and Service S7
CHRIST
Deemed to be University

5.1. PROJECT DETAILS


Load calculation

3. Seismic load
Seismic load is analysed by software as per IS893:2002(Part 1)
zone = .16
Type of soil : Medium soil
Type of structure : Rc structure
Importance factor =1(Table 2 of IS 1893: 2002)
Response reduction factor, R = 3.0(Table 7 of IS 1893: 2002)

Excellence and Service S7


CHRIST
Deemed to be University

5.1. PROJECT DETAILS


Load combination

Load combinations are considered as per IS 456: 2000 and are given in Table

Excellence and Service S7


CHRIST
Deemed to be University

5.1. PROJECT DETAILS

Dead load applied Live load applied

Fig 5.06: Dead and live load applied

Excellence and Service S7


CHRIST
Deemed to be University

5.1. PROJECT DETAILS

Eqz load applied


Eqx load applied

Fig 5.06: Earthquake loads applied

Excellence and Service S7


CHRIST
Deemed to be University

5.1. PROJECT DETAILS

Wind load in x direction applied Wind load in z direction applied

Fig 5.07: wind loads loads applied

Excellence and Service S7


CHRIST
Deemed to be University

5.1. RESULT FROM ANALYSIS

Fig 5.08: Bending moment

Excellence and Service S7


CHRIST
Deemed to be University

5.1. RESULT FROM ANALYSIS

Fig 5.09: Shear force

Excellence and Service S7


CHRIST
Deemed to be University

5.1. DESIGN OF BEAM


Selected beams size : 300 x 400m

Grade of concrete = M20


Grade of steel = Fe415
Grade of steel for stirrups = Fe415
Clear cover = 30mm
Size of beam = 300 x 400mm
Length of beam = 3700 mm

Fig 5.09: concrete design of selected beam

Excellence and Service S7


CHRIST
Deemed to be University

5.1. DESIGN OF BEAM


5.1.1 Design of beam using IS-456

Fig 5.1.: staad output of selected beam

Excellence and Service S7


CHRIST
Deemed to be University

5.1. DESIGN OF BEAM


Effective depth provided, d = 400-30-8 = 362mm
= 10 to 15
Effective depth required, dreq = 3700/12 = 308mm < 362mm
Hence, ok
At left end
Maximum Bending Moment =44.959kNm
Maximum Shear Force =48.913kN
Maximum Torsional Moment = 2.69kNm
Mu =.87fyAstd (1 - )
49.656 x 106 = .87 x 415 x Ast x 362 ()
(Ast)required = 432.94mm2
Assume 16mm Dia bars,
No. of bars = = 2.15 ≈ 3 bars

Excellence and Service S7


CHRIST
Deemed to be University

5.1. DESIGN OF BEAM


(Ast)provided = 3 x 162 =603.185mm2
Check

(Ast)min = = 148.28 mm2 < 603.15mm2

(Ast)max = 0.04bd = 0.04 x 200 x 362 = 2896 mm2 > 603.15 mm2
Hence, ok.
Therefore, provide 3-16 mm Dia bars at top of left support.

Excellence and Service S7


CHRIST
Deemed to be University

5.1. DESIGN OF BEAM


Design for Shear
Ve = Vu +1.6 =69.71kN
= (From IS 456: 2000, clause 40.1)
=.96N/mm2
= 2.8 N/mm2 >.96N/mm2 (From IS 456: 2000, Table20)
= = .833
= .58 N/mm2 < .96N/mm2 (From IS 456: 2000, Table19)
Assume 2 legged 8mm Dia vertical stirrups
Asv =(From IS 456: 2000, clause 41.4.3)

Excellence and Service S7


CHRIST
Deemed to be University

5.1. DESIGN OF BEAM


As per IS 456: 2000, clause 26.5.1.5
 Max. spacing of shear reinforcement = 0.75d = 0.75×362 = 271.5mm
Or
 300mm, whichever is less.

Hence provide spacing, Sv = 145mm

At Mid-span section
Maximum Bending Moment =16.356kNm
Maximum Shear Force = 13.712kN
Maximum Torsional Moment = 2.69 kNm
Mu = .87fyAstd (1 - )
21.057 x 106 = .87 x 415 x Ast x 362 ()
(Ast)required = 170mm2
Assume 12mm Dia bars,
No. of bars = = 1.50≈ 2 bars

Excellence and Service S7


CHRIST
Deemed to be University

5.1. DESIGN OF BEAM


(Ast)provided = 2 x 122 = 226.19mm2

Check for Reinforcements (From IS 456: 2000, clause 26.5.1.1)

(Ast)min = = 148.28 mm2 < 226mm2

(Ast)max = 0.04bd = 0.04 x 200 x 362 = 2896 mm2 > 226 mm2
Hence, ok.

Design for Shear

Factored shear force, Vu = 13.712kN

Factored torsional moment, Tu =2.69kNm


Equivalent shear, Ve = Vu +1.6

Excellence and Service S7


CHRIST
Deemed to be University

5.1. DESIGN OF BEAM


= (From IS 456: 2000, clause 40.1)
= .486N/mm2
= 2.8 N/mm2 > .486N/mm2 (From IS 456: 2000, Table20)
= = .31
= .38N/mm2 < .486N/mm2
Assume 2 legged 8mm dia vertical stirrups
≥ (from IS 456: 2000, clause 26.5.1.6)


≤ 453.70mm

Excellence and Service S7


CHRIST
Deemed to be University

5.1. DESIGN OF BEAM


As per IS 456: 2000, clause 26.5.1.5
Max. spacing of shear reinforcement = 0.75d=0.75×362=271.5mm
Or
300mm, whichever is less
Therefore adopt 2 legged 8mm stirrups @ 300mm c/c at midspan
At right end
Maximum Bending Moment =45.764kNm
Maximum Shear Force =52.075kN
Maximum Torsional Moment = 2.69 kNm

Mu = .87fyAstd (1 - )

50.464 x 106 = .87 x 415 x Ast x 362 ()

(Ast)required = 442.12mm2

Excellence and Service S7


CHRIST
Deemed to be University

5.1. DESIGN OF BEAM


Assume 16mm Dia bars,
No. of bars = = 2.19 ≈ 3 bars
(Ast)provided = 2 x 162 = 603 mm2

Design for Shear


Ve = Vu +1.6 = 73.59kN
= (From IS 456: 2000, clause 40.1)
=1.01N/mm2
= 2.8 N/mm2 >1.01 N/mm2 (From IS 456: 2000, Table20)
= = .833
= .58 N/mm2 < 1.01N/mm2 (From IS 456: 2000, Table19)

Excellence and Service S7


CHRIST
Deemed to be University

5.1. DESIGN OF BEAM


Asv =

Sv = 295.62mm
As per IS 456: 2000, clause 26.5.1.5
 Max. spacing of shear reinforcement = 0.75d = 0.75×362 = 271.5mm
Or
 300mm, whichever is less.
Hence provide spacing, Sv = 145mm

Excellence and Service S7


CHRIST
Deemed to be University

5.1. DESIGN OF BEAM


Asv =

Sv = 295.62mm
As per IS 456: 2000, clause 26.5.1.5
 Max. spacing of shear reinforcement = 0.75d = 0.75×362 = 271.5mm
Or
 300mm, whichever is less.
Hence provide spacing, Sv = 145mm

Excellence and Service S7


CHRIST
Deemed to be University

5.1. DESIGN OF BEAM

5.1.2 Design of beam using IS-13920

Fig 5.09: staad output of selected beam

Excellence and Service S7


CHRIST
Deemed to be University

5.1. DESIGN OF BEAM


Design of selected beam using IS13920

Width of beam, B = 300mm > 200 mm, (Clause 6.1.2; IS 13920:2016)


Hence, ok
Depth of beam, D = 400 mm
= = .75 > .3
Hence ok (Clause 6.1.1; IS 13920:2016)
Clear Span, L = 3700mm
= = 9.25 > 4 (Clause 6.1.4 of IS: 13920-1993)
Minimum reinforcement =.24 x = .26% = 257mm2 (Clause 6.21(b) of IS 13920: 2016)
Maximum reinforcement = 2.5% =2490 mm2 (Clause 6.2.2 of IS 13920: 2016)

=
Excellence and Service S7
CHRIST
Deemed to be University

5.1. DESIGN OF BEAM


1)At Left end

Design for Hogging Moment


Mu= 52.98kN-m
= = 1.60
= = .20 (Referring to Table-50 of SP: 16)
we get Ast at top = 0.55 % = x 300 x 332 = 547.8mm2
Asc must be at least 50% of Ast
So , Asc at bottom = x 300 x 332 =273.9mm2

Excellence and Service S8


CHRIST
Deemed to be University

5.1. DESIGN OF BEAM


1)At Left end
Design for Sagging Moment
Mu= 35.43 kN-m
Mu = .87fyAstd (1 - ) (Annex G of IS 456: 2000)
we get Ast at bottom = 299mm2
>Minimum reinforcement (257mm2 )
<Maximum reinforcement (2490mm2 )

Required reinforcement

Top reinforcement required is 547mm2.

Bottom reinforcement required is larger of 273.9mm 2and 299mm2. Hence, provide 299mm2

Excellence and Service S8


CHRIST
Deemed to be University

5.1. DESIGN OF BEAM


2)At Mid span end

Design for Hogging Moment

Mu= 16.16kN-m

= = .488

= = .17 (Referring to Table-50 of SP: 16)

we get Ast at top = 0.17 % = x 300 x 332 = 169.32mm2 <min reinforcement

So, min reinforcement provided i.e. 257mm 2

Excellence and Service S8


CHRIST
Deemed to be University

5.1. DESIGN OF BEAM

Design for Hogging Moment


Mu= 52.98kN-m
= = 1.60
= = .20 (Referring to Table-50 of SP: 16)
we get Ast at top = 0.55 % = x 300 x 332 = 547.8mm2
> Minimum reinforcement (257mm2 )
< Maximum reinforcement (2490mm2 )
Asc must be at least 50% of Ast (Clause 6.2.3 of IS: 13920:2016)
Hence, Asc at bottom = 0.275 %
Asc at bottom = x 300 x 332 =273.9mm2

Excellence and Service S8


CHRIST
Deemed to be University

5.1. DESIGN OF BEAM


Design for Hogging Moment

Mu= 10.619kN-m
Mu = .87fyAstd (1 - ) (Annex G of IS 456: 2000)
we get Ast at bottom = 89mm2 < min reinforcement
So, min reinforcement provided at bottom i.e. 257mm2

On the left support, provide 2-16+1-16mm extra Dia bars( .61%) at top and provide
2-12+1-16mm extra Dia bars(.43%) at bottom , on the right support i.e., over the
central span , 2-16 +1-16mm extra Dia bars at top(.61%) and provide 2-12 + 1-
16mm extra Dia bars(.43%) at bottom

Excellence and Service S8


CHRIST
Deemed to be University

5.1. DESIGN OF BEAM


Design for shear
Design Shear Strength of Concrete
Tensile steel provided at left end = .55%
Permissible design shear stress of concrete,
τ c = 0.5MPa (IS 456:2000 Table 19)
Design shear strength of concrete = τ c b d = x 300 x 332 =49.8kN
Similarly, design shear strength of concrete at centre and right end is evaluated
as 29.9kN and 49.8kN respectively.

Excellence and Service S9


CHRIST
Deemed to be University

5.1. DESIGN OF BEAM

Shear Force Due to Plastic Hinge Formation at the ends of the Beam
The additional shear due to formation of plastic hinges at both ends of the beams is
evaluated as per clause 6.3.3 of IS 13920:1993 and is given by
Vsway to right =
Vsway to left =
For pt = .61% and pc = 0.43% in left end, referring to Table 50 of SP: 16,
We get = 3.90
Hogging moment capacity at A
3.90 x 300 x 3322 = 128kNm
Mu = .87fyAstd (1 - ) (Annex G of IS 456: 2000)

Excellence and Service S9


CHRIST
Deemed to be University

5.1. DESIGN OF BEAM

Shear Force Due to Plastic Hinge Formation at the ends of the Beam
Ast = 299mm2
= 35.43kNm
Similarly, for the right end of the beam
For pt = .61% and pc = 0.23% in left end, referring to Table 50 of SP:
16,
We get = 3.35
Hogging moment capacity at B
3.35 x 300 x 3322 = 110.7kNm
Mu = .87fyAstd (1 - ) (Annex G of IS 456: 2000)
Ast = 257mm2
= 30.4kNm

Excellence and Service S9


CHRIST
Deemed to be University

5.1. DESIGN OF BEAM

Shear Force Due to Plastic Hinge Formation at the ends of the Beam
Shear is calculated as below:
Vsway to right = = = kN
Vsway to left = = = kN

Design for shear


DL = Trapezoidal dead load + Wall and self-load = 4.911+ 11 = 15.933
kN
LL = 2.466kN
SFDL+ LL = = 40.84kN

Excellence and Service S9


CHRIST
Deemed to be University

5.1. DESIGN OF BEAM


Shear at left end for sway to right,
- = 40.48 - 24.90 = 15.94kN
Shear at left end for sway to left,
+ = 40.48 + 24.90 = 65.38kN
Shear at right end for sway to right,
Vu,b = + = 40.48 + 90.3 = 130.78kN
Shear at right end for sway to left,
Vu,b = - = 40.48 - 90.3 = 49.82kN

Excellence and Service S9


CHRIST
Deemed to be University

5.1. DESIGN OF BEAM


Hence, design shear force (Vu) will be 65.38 kN for left end of the beam and
130.78 kN for the right end.
The required capacity of shear reinforcement at the left end of the beam is:
= –
=65.38 – 49.8 = 15.58kN
Similarly, the, required capacity of shear reinforcement at the right end and
at mid-span is 90.8kN and 60.4 kN, respectively
Referring to Table 62 of SP:16, we get the required spacing of 2 legged 8φ
stirrups as 145mm`, 300mm and 145mm respectively at left end, centre
and right end.
Spacing of links over a length of 2d at either end of beam as per Clause 6.3.5
of IS13920: 1993 shall be the least of:
i) d/4 = 332 /4 = 83 mm
ii) 8 times diameter of smallest bar = 8 x 16 = 128 mm However, it need
not be less than 100 mm.
Excellence and Service S9
CHRIST
Deemed to be University

5.1. DESIGN OF BEAM


Hence, design shear force (Vu) will be 65.38 kN for left end of the beam and
130.78 kN for the right end.
The required capacity of shear reinforcement at the left end of the beam is:
= –
=65.38 – 49.8 = 15.58kN
Similarly, the, required capacity of shear reinforcement at the right end and
at mid-span is 90.8kN and 60.4 kN, respectively
Referring to Table 62 of SP:16, we get the required spacing of 2 legged 8φ
stirrups as 145mm`, 300mm and 145mm respectively at left end, centre
and right end.
Spacing of links over a length of 2d at either end of beam as per Clause 6.3.5
of IS13920: 1993 shall be the least of:
i) d/4 = 332 /4 = 83 mm
ii) 8 times diameter of smallest bar = 8 x 16 = 128 mm However, it need
not be less than 100 mm.
Excellence and Service S9
CHRIST
Deemed to be University

5.1. DESIGN OF COLUMN


Selected column size : 300 x 600m

Grade of concrete = M20


Grade of steel = Fe415
Grade of steel for stirrups = Fe415
Clear cover = 40mm
Length of column = 3150 mm

Excellence and Service S9


CHRIST
Deemed to be University

5.1. DESIGN OF COLUMN


Design for Earthquake in X-direction
Pu = 868.5kN
Mu = 3.590kN-m
= = .24
= = 0.01
= = 0.1
We get = .02 ( Referring to Charts 44 a of 16)
1.4 Design for Earthquake in Z-direction
Pu = 841kN
Mu = 154kN-m
= = .23

Excellence and Service S9


CHRIST
Deemed to be University

5.1. DESIGN OF COLUMN


= = 0.14
= = 0.1
We get = .09 ( Referring to Charts 48 of SP16)
Longitudinal Steel The required steel will be governed by the higher of the above two
values and hence, take = 0.09
Required steel = (0.09x 20) % = 1.8% = = 3240mm2
Provide 6-25Φ + 2-16 Φ bars with total Asc provided = 3342mm2
= = 1.8
Hence provided = = .09

Excellence and Service S9


CHRIST
Deemed to be University

5.1. DESIGN OF COLUMN


Checking of Section.
Checking for Critical Combination with Earthquake in X Direction
(Longitudinal direction)
Width = 300mm; Depth = 600mm
Pu = 868kN
Mu = 3.590kN-m
Eccentricity = +
(Clause 25.4 of IS 456:2000)
= + = 15.59mm < 20mm

Hence, design eccentricity = 20 mm.


Mu = 868 x 0.02 = 17.36kN-m

Excellence and Service S9


CHRIST
Deemed to be University

5.1. DESIGN OF COLUMN


For = .24 and = .09 and = 0.1 (referring to Charts 46 of SP 16)
= .16
=.16 x 20 x 300 x 600 x 600 = 345kNm
=.16 x 20 x 600 x 300 x 300 = 171.2kNm
= .45 (Clause 39.6 of IS 456:2000)
= .45
= .45 x 20 x 300 x 600 + (.75 x 500 - .45 x 20) x 829 = 1923.4kN
= = .45 < 0.8 (Clause 39.6 of IS 456:2000)

Excellence and Service S9


CHRIST
Deemed to be University

5.1. DESIGN OF COLUMN

The constant αn which depends on factored axial compression resistance Puz is


evaluated as
= 1+ = 1.4

Using the interaction formula (clause 39.6 of IS 456: 2000)


+ = + = .04
= .04 < 1
Hence ok.
Checking for Critical Combination with Earthquake in Z Direction
(Transverse direction)
Width = 600mm; Depth = 300mm
Pu = 841kN
Mu = 154kN-m
Excellence and Service S9
CHRIST
Deemed to be University

5.1. DESIGN OF COLUMN

Eccentricity = +
(Clause 25.4 of IS456:2000)

= + = 25.9mm > 20mm


Hence, design eccentricity = 25.9mm.
Mu = 841 x 0.0259 = 21.78kN-m
For = .23 and = .088 and = 0.1 (referring to Charts 48 of SP 16)
= .15
=.15 x 20 x 300 x 600 x 600 = 486kNm
=.15 x 20 x 300 x 300 x 600 = 162kNm

Excellence and Service S9


CHRIST
Deemed to be University

5.1. DESIGN OF COLUMN


= .45 (Clause 39.6 of IS 456:2000)
= .45
= .45 x 20 x 300 x 600 + (.75 x 500 - .45 x 20) x 829 = 1923.4kN
= = .437 >0.2 (Clause 39.6 of IS 456:2000)
The constant αn which depends on factored axial compression resistance Puz is
evaluated as
= 1+ = 1.4
Using the interaction formula (clause 39.6 of IS
456: 2000)
+ = + = .94

Excellence and Service S9


CHRIST
Deemed to be University

5.1. DESIGN OF COLUMN


= .94 < 1
Hence ok.
So steel is Provide 6-25Φ + 4-16Φ bars with total Asc provided = 3750 mm2
(2.08%)
Design for Shear
Assuming 50% steel provided as tensile steel to be on tension side,
= . = 1.041%
permissible shear stress τ c = 0.628Mpa (Table 19 of IS 456: 2000)
Considering lowest Pu = 481kN,
we get Multiplying factor = δ = 1+ = 1.004
= 1.004 < 1.5 (Clause 40.2.2 of IS 456: 2000)

Excellence and Service S9


CHRIST
Deemed to be University

5.1. DESIGN OF COLUMN


= 1.041 x 1.004 = 1.04 MPa
Shear force capacity ()\
Effective depth in X direction =600 - 40 - = 550mm
= . = 171.6kN
Effective depth in Z direction = 300 - 40 - = 250mm
= . = 156kN
Shear As per analysis
From the analysis, the maximum factored shear force in X and Z direction is 59kN and
.035kN, respectively.

Excellence and Service S9


CHRIST
Deemed to be University

5.1. DESIGN OF COLUMN


Shear Force Due to Plastic Hinge Formation at Ends of Beam
=
= = 253kN
Details of Transverse Reinforcement
Design of Links in X Direction
Vs = 253 – 171= 82kN
Spacing of 2 legged 8 Φ Links = 2x 50 x 0.87 x 415 x550 x (1/3000) =
242mm
Nominal Link
The spacing of hoops shall not exceed half the least lateral dimension of the
column, i.e., 300/ 2 = 150 mm. (Clause 7.3.3 of
IS 13920: 1993)
Provide 8 Φ links @ 150 c/c in mid-height portion of column.

Excellence and Service S9


CHRIST
Deemed to be University

5.1. DESIGN OF COLUMN


confining link (Clause 8.1 of IS 13920: 1993).
a. The spacing of links < ¼ x 300 = 75mm
< 6 x 16 = 96mm
< 100mm
b. The confining length on either side of joint maximum of
i. 600
ii.1/6 x 3150
iii.>450
Hence, the confining length = 600mm
The area of cross section Ash of the bar forming rectangular hoop to be used
as special confining reinforcement shall not be less than
Ash =
Assuming 10mm Dia stirrup, Ash = 78.54
h = 600-40-4= 520

Excellence and Service S9


CHRIST
Deemed to be University

5.1. DESIGN OF COLUMN


78.54 =
Substituting we get S = 30 mm.
Link spacing for confining zone shall not exceed:
¼ of minimum column dimension i.e., 300 / 4 = 75 mm. But need not be less
than 75 mm nor more than 100 mm (Clause 7.4.6 of IS 13920: 1993).
Provide 10Φ confining links @ 75 c/c for a distance Lo which shall not be less
than:
a. Larger lateral dimension = 600 mm
b.1/6 of clear span = (3,150 –500)/6 = 417 mm
c. 450 mm (Clause 7.4.1 of IS 13920: 1993)

Excellence and Service S9


CHRIST
Deemed to be University
6. DESIGN OF SHEAR WALL

Loading Axial force(kN) Moment(kNm) Shear(kN)


DL+LL 610 1292 10.5

Earthquake 110 1328.3 50.43

Material constants
Grade of concrete = M25
Grade of steel = Fe415
Preliminary dimensioning
Horizontal length of the wall, L = 4m
Thickness of the wall, t = 250mm
The minimum thickness of shear walls shall not be less than 150mm
(As per IS 13920: 2016, clause 10.1.2)
Design moment = 1328.3kNm
Design shear force = 50.43kN

Excellence and Service S9


CHRIST
Deemed to be University
6. DESIGN OF SHEAR WALL
Check for boundary elements
As per IS 13920: 2016, clause 10.4.1
Boundary elements are provided if extreme fibre stress exceeds 0.2f ck.
Moment of inertia, I = = = 1.33x1012mm4
Extreme fibre stress: = ± = ± ( x )
= 8.89N/mm2 & -8.67 N/mm2

0.2fck=0.2×25 = 5N/mm2< 8.67mm


Hence, boundary elements are required
Therefore, adopt flanged shear wall with central length 2800mm and two
ends 300 x 600mm

Excellence and Service S9


CHRIST
Deemed to be University
6. DESIGN OF SHEAR WALL
Nominal shear stress, =
25√fck = 1.118 N/mm2 > .38 N/mm2 (IS 13920: 2016, clause 10.1.7)
But wall thickness is 250mm which is greater than 200mm.
Hence, steel has to be provided on 2 layers.

Steel requirements
Area of steel provided per metre length, Ast = 0.0025 Aw=0.0025×1000×250=625mm2
Assume 10mm bars to be used
Steel in one layer= = 312.5mm2
Spacing, S = = = 251.32mm ≈ 250mm
Maximum spacing shall not exceed (As per IS 13920: 2016, clause 10.1.9)
a) x Lw ×= x 4000 = 800mm
b) 3 times tw=3×250 = 750mm
c) 450mm
Therefore, provide 10mm bars @300mm c/c on both faces horizontally and vertically.
(Ast)Provided = = 628.31mm2
Excellence and Service S9
CHRIST
Deemed to be University
6. DESIGN OF SHEAR WALL
Therefore, provide 10mm bars @300mm c/c on both faces horizontally and vertically.
(Ast)Provided = = 628.31mm2
Check
Shear check
Vus =

)req = = .0138

( )pro = = .628

Since ( )pro > ( )req

Excellence and Service S9


CHRIST
Deemed to be University
6. DESIGN OF SHEAR WALL
Therefore, provide 10mm bars @300mm c/c on both faces horizontally and vertically.
(Ast)Provided = = 628.31mm2
Check
Shear check
Vus =

)req = = .0138

( )pro = = .628

Since ( )pro > ( )req

Excellence and Service S9


CHRIST
Deemed to be University
6. DESIGN OF SHEAR WALL

Flexural capacity of web

Pu1 = 620kN (Min downward force)

Loads on web = = = 409kN

= )( -(.168+) = = .013

Moment of resistance of web portion, Mu = .0039 x fck x tw

= .039 x 20 x 250 x 28002 = 1528.8kNm >1328.3

Boundary element are designed as column

Assume 16mm dia bars = = = 7.16 ≈ 8

Therefore provide 8-16mm dia bars


Excellence and Service S9
CHRIST
Deemed to be University
6. DESIGN OF SHEAR WALL

Spacing, Sv = = 155mm
As per IS 13920:2016, clause 10.4.4
Spacing shall not be more than
a) of minimum dimension of boundary element = x 300 = 100mm
b) 6 times diameter of smallest longitudinal bar = 6×16-96mm
c) 100mm

Therefore provide 8mm & lateral ties @ 95mm c/c. and provide 10mm bars
@250mm c/c on both faces horizontally and vertically on the web and On the boundary
element provide 6-16mm bars and provide 8mm lateral ties @ 95mm c/c

Excellence and Service S9


CHRIST
Deemed to be University
7. DESIGN OF BEAM-COLUMN JOINT
bea3-16mm Dia (603 mm2, i.e.,

Transverse beam of size 300 x 400) is


12-12 dia reinforced with 3-16mm Dia at top and
reinforced in
column bottom
.402%) at top of size 300 x 400 is
transverse beam of size 300 x 400 is
reinforced with 3-16mm Dia (603 mm2,
i.e.,
.
Longitudinal beam of size 300 x 400)
is reinforced with 3-16mm Dia + 1-
16mm at top and 3-16mm Dia at
bottom
.402%) at top of size 300 x 400 is
transverse beam of size 300 x 400 is
Excellence and Service S9
CHRIST
Deemed to be University
7. DESIGN OF BEAM-COLUMN JOINT

Check for Earthquake in Y-Direction


=
= = 63.55kN

Force Developed in Beam Reinforcement

Force developed in the top bar


T1 = Ast x 1.25 x fy /1000
= 603 x 1.25 x 415/1000 = 312.806kN = C1
Force developed in the bottom bar
T2 = Ast x 1.25 x fy
=603 x 1.25 x 415 ==312.806kN = C2
VJoint = T1 + C2 – Vcol
= 417.075+ 312.806 – 46.25 =683.681 kN

Excellence and Service S9


1.5
CHRIST
Deemed to be University
7. DESIGN OF BEAM-COLUMN JOINT

Aej

f ck

Excellence and Service S9


CHRIST
Deemed to be University

REFERENCES
1. IS:456-2000, Code of practice for plain and reinforced cement concrete.
2. Indian Standard, 875: 1987 (part-I), Dead Loads-Unit Weights of Building
Materials and Stored Materials (1987).
3. Indian Standard, 875: 1987 (part-II), Code of practice for design loads (other
than earthquake) for buildings and structures: part 2—imposed loads (second
revision) (1987).
4. SP: 16-1980 ”Design aids for Reinforced Concrete to IS: 456-1978”, Bureau
of Indian Standards, New Delhi
5. IS 1893:2002 - Part I, ”Criteria for Earthquake Resistant Design of
structures”, Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi
6. IS 13920:1993 ;Ductile design of building ductile detailing of reinforced
concrete structures subjected to seismic forces
Excellence and Service S9
CHRIST
Deemed to be University

THANK
YOU

Excellence and Service

You might also like