Environmental Legislation Regulations

You might also like

Download as ppt, pdf, or txt
Download as ppt, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 26

Environmental Legislation & Regulations

Professor Natalie Carroll ASM 336 September 18, 2005

Who governs environmental laws and policies?

US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA): The governing body for major statues or laws National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)-1969: establishes policies, set goals and facilitate the implementation of such policies NEPA requires federal agencies to assess environmental impact of implementing their major program (Work with NASA & Army)

Positive Aspects of Regulations

Protection of the Environment

Concerns about Regulations

Structured so costs excessive compared to benefits. Command-and-control US Free Market Choice Uneven application of regulations Lack properly structured incentives Generate inefficiencies Paper work, costs Duplicative (Federal, State, etc)

Environmental Regulations

Clean Air Act (CAA)-1970 Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA)-1974 Clean Water Act (CWA)-1977 Resource Conservation & Recovery Act (RCRA) 1976 Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA)-1980 Federal Insecticide, Fungicide & Rodenticide Act (FIFRA) -1972 Food Quality Protection Act (FQPA) -1996

Clean Air Act (CAA) - 1970

Diesel Engines

Odor

Safe Drinking Water Act

Protect nations sources of drinking water Protect public health through treatment techniques MCLs: Maximum Contaminant Level Protect underground sources of drinking water Well Head protection areas

Clean Water Act (1972)

Water Pollution Control Restore & maintain chemical, physical and biological integrity of the nations waters Community sewers NPS pollution control (TMDLs!!!) National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES)

Resource Conservation & Recovery Act (RCRA)

Hazardous Waste Underground tanks Control Solid Waste Regulation of facilities which burn waste

Comprehensive Environment Response, Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA)


Also known as the Superfund Establish a Hazardous Substance Superfund Establish regulations controlling hazardous waste sites Provide liability for hazardous waste release from inactive sites

Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization Act (SARA)-1986

Revise and extends CERCLA Emergency planning & preparedness, community right-to-know reporting and toxic chemical release reporting Material Safety Data Sheets (MSDS)

Federal Insecticide, Fungicide and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA)


Regulates the use and safety of pesticides products and features Classification and certification of pesticide by specific use Evaluation of risk posed by pesticides (Required for registration) Restriction of use of pesticides harmful to the environment Enforcement of requirements through inspections, labeling, notices and state regulations Groundwater management plan

Additional Regulations

Wild and Scenic Rivers Act -establishes wild and scenic river system Coastal Zone Management Act (CZMA) - balanced preservation & development in coastal areas Endangered Species Act - conserve endangered and threatened species

Additional Regulations

Marine Protection, Research and Sanctuaries Act - regulates dumping of all types of materials into ocean Toxic Substance Control Act (TSCA) - sets up toxic substances program - EPA can require manufacturers to collect data on effects of their substance National Historic Prevention Act -preserve, restore and maintain cultural resources

Additional Regulations

Occupational Safety and Health Act (OSHA) -1970 Oil Pollution Act (OPA)-1990 Endangered Species Act (ESA)-1973

The following slides were taken from a presentation given by Dr. Thomas L. Theis, Director of the Institute for Environmental Science and Policy, University of Illinois at Chicago. September 13, 2005, Purdue University

Seminar title: Environmental Manufacturing

Management: A New Approach to Sustainability

CONTEXT

We Have Been Altering the Environment for a Long Time but are Just Beginning to Take Responsibility Environmental Issues are Not Just More Global, but More Complex Firms are Increasingly Being Held Responsible for Environmental and Social Externalities With Which They are Associated

Sustainability Requires a Different Way of Thinking About How We Interact Within the Environment That: Stresses integration of our needs with those of our progeny Views the natural world as a constrained system Sees humanity as part of a symbiotic relationship with the world Recognizes the value of ecosystem services Understands the need to make decisions within a holistic framework

HISTORICAL APPROACHES TO ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT


ERA TIME FRAME Past PRIMARY ACTIVITY Simple Controls / Burial PRIMARY FOCUS Specific Site, End-of-Pipe ENDPOINT ENVIRONMENTAL VS. ECONOMICS Overhead CONCEPTUAL MODEL Largely Voluntary

DISCIPLINARY APPROACH Insular -Reductionist

Pre-Regulatory (< 1965)

Visual / Navigability

Regulatory (1965- 1990)

Past / Present

Compliance / Remediation

Specific Site, End of Pipe

Reduce Anthropocentric Risk

Negative Profit

Command-andcontrol

Environmental Sciences / Engineering -Interdisciplinary

Global (> 1990)

Present / Future

Industrial Ecology / Design for Environment

Materials, Manufacturing, Products, Services Over Life Cycle

Waste Minimization / Global Sustainability

Strategic

Systems Approach

Physical / Chemical / Biological Sciences; Architecture; Law; Ethics; Urban Planning -Integrative

Traditional (Compliance) Perspective


Final product and residuals measured at the factory, in terms of materials production.
Residuals: Waste & pollution

Finished material

Systems (Optimization) Perspective


Film & paper production

Final product is measured in terms of service, rather than material, at end of chain rather than in middle.

Exposure (Capture)

Storage

Film developing & printing

Final Product

DRIVING FORCES

Accelerated Costs of Environmental Compliance Legislation Focused on Product and Socially Responsible Stewardship New, More Efficient Processing Technologies Application of Life Cycle Analysis and Total Cost Accounting Ability to Measure More Accurately the Impacts of Waste Emissions

USEPA Policy Statement


to move the Nation from a waste-oriented to a life cycle management way of thinking about materials. (USEPA Strategic Plan, 2003-2008, p. 60)

You might also like