Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Bus Fin Portfolio
Bus Fin Portfolio
• Any larger amounts would increase the need for external funding without a
corresponding increase in profits, whereas any smaller holdings would involve late
payments to labor and suppliers and lost sales due to inventory shortages and an overly
restrictive credit policy.
• But, under uncertainty, firms hold some minimum amount of cash and inventories
based on expected payments, expected sales, expected order lead times, and so on, plus
additional amounts, or safety stocks, that enable them to deal with departures from the
expected values.
Working Capital Investment and Financing Policies:
Alternative Current Asset Investment Policies
• With a restricted current asset investment policy, the firm would hold minimal levels of
safety stocks for cash and inventories, and it would have a tight credit policy, even
though this would mean running the risk of losing sales.
• A restricted current asset investment policy generally provides the highest expected
return on investment, but it entails the greatest risk, whereas the reverse is true under a
relaxed policy.
• The moderate policy falls in between the two extremes in terms of both expected risk
and return.
• A restricted current asset investment policy as a result would lead to a relatively short
cash conversion cycle, a relaxed policy would lead to a relatively longer cash conversion
cycle, and moderate policy would lead to a cash conversion cycle in between two
extremes.
Working Capital Investment and Financing Policies:
Alternative Current Asset Financing Policies
• Most businesses experience seasonal fluctuations, cyclical fluctuations, or both and
thereby, their current assets (receivables, inventories) fluctuates as well.
• But, current assets rarely drop to zero rather a stable amount of currents assets are held
on an average and this level of current assets is called permanent current assets.
• On the other hand, temporary current assets fluctuate from zero to peak level with
respect to the seasonal or economic conditions of a firm.
• The manner in which the permanent and temporary current assets are financed is called
the firm’s current asset financing policy.
Working Capital Investment and Financing Policies:
Alternative Current Asset Financing Policies
• Maturity Matching, or “Self-Liquidating” Approach
• This approach calls for matching asset and liability maturities to minimize the risk that
the firm will be unable to pay off its maturing obligations if the liquidations of the assets
can be controlled to occur on or before the maturities of the obligations.
• But, exact maturity matching is
unrealistic so firms follow a
moderate current asset
financing policy as inventories
having a conversion period of
30 days should not be financed
with a 30-day loan because
complete cash sales might not
happen.
Working Capital Investment and Financing Policies:
Alternative Current Asset Financing Policies
• Aggressive Approach
• This approach calls for
financing all of the temporary
assets with short-term, non-
spontaneous debt and
financing all the fixed assets
with long-term capital, but
some of the remainder of the
permanent currents assets is
financed with short-term,
nonspontaneous credit.
Working Capital Investment and Financing Policies:
Alternative Current Asset Financing Policies
• Conservative Approach
• This approach calls for financing all
of the permanent assets with
permanent capital as well as some
or all portion the seasonal or
temporary assets with
permanent capital.
• During seasonal peaks the firm
finances temporary asset demands
with short-term nonspontaneous
credit.
• The policy is not as profitable as
the other two approaches.
Advantages and Disadvantages of Short-Term
Financing
• The aggressive policy calls for the greatest use of short-term debt, whereas the
conservative policy requires the least short-term debt, and maturity matching falls in
between.
• Using short-term credit is riskier but has some pros as well.
• Speed
• A short-term loan can be obtained much faster than long-term credit as lenders will
insist on a more thorough financial examination and considerably detailed loan
agreement before extending long-term credit.
• Flexibility
• If the needs for funds are seasonal or cyclical then short-term credit is much flexible as
costs of long-term debt are significantly greater, expensive penalties exist for
prepayment of long-term debt, and rigid covenants of long-term debt agreements
constrain the future actions of the firm.
Advantages and Disadvantages of Short-Term
Financing
• Risk of long-Term versus Short-Term Debt
• Short-term credit subjects the firm to more risk than does long-term financing.
• When a firm borrows on a long-term basis, its interest costs will be relatively stable or
fixed over time, but this is not the case for short-term credit as interest rates fluctuates
frequently.
• Overwhelming amount of short-term financing can lead firm into bankruptcy as the firm
might find it difficult to payoff such huge loans within a very short time period.