Welcomes

Members of the Expert Team from

NATIONAL BOARD OF ACCREDITATION (NBA)

Dr. SYAM MOHAN, HOD/CSE

Presentation 2023 24.11.2023
CONTENTS

PART 1
INTRODUCTION
DEPARTMENT ACHIEVEMENTS/RECOGNITIONS
CRITERIA 1 - VISION MISSION AND PROGRAM EDUCATIONAL OBJECTIVES
CRITERIA 2 - PROGRAM CURRICULUM AND TEACHING – LEARNING PROCESSES
CRITERIA 3 - PROGRAM OUTCOMES AND COURSE OUTCOMES
CRITERIA 4 - STUDENTS PERFORMANCE
CRITERIA 5 - FACULTY INFORMATION AND CONTRIBUTION
CRITERIA 6 - FACILITIES AND TECHNICAL SUPPORT - TEACHING LABS AND SPECIAL
LABORATORIES
CRITERIA 7 - CONTINUOUS IMPROVEMENT

PART II
OBE PHILOSOPHY OF THE DEPARTMENT

2
INTRODUCTION

Programme Description

COMPUTER SCIENCE & ENGINEERING Started in the year 2009 with an intake
of 60 seats
Current intake (2023) is 120

3
M A J O R A C H I E V E M E N T S / R E C O G N I T I O N S ( D E PA RT M E N T L E V E L )

 Unnikuttan L S of CSE
represents Kerala State in
the National Pesapello
Championship held in
Rajasthan.
 Muhammed Ali Ansari of
CSE represented APJ Abdul
AY: 2018-19 Kalam Technological
University VolleyBall Team
in the All India Inter
University VolleyBall
Championship held at SRM
University Chennai
MOU

4
M A J O R A C H I E V E M E N T S / R E C O G N I T I O N S ( FA C U LT Y )

SL. FACULTY NAME TITLE NAME OF JOURNAL IMPACT YEAR

NO FACTOR
1 Dr. RAMANI K i. REMEDY FOR THE CLONE JOURNAL OF APPLIED 4.2 2014
ATTACK USING AGENT BY ENGINEERING RESEARCH
INTELLIGENT ROUTING IN
MANET
ii. ENERGY EFFICIENT AGENT AJBAS 2.5 2015
BASED INTELLIGENT ROUTING
IN MANET INTEGRATED WITH
MPLS

2. Dr. SYAM MOHAN i. A STUDY OF CHARACTERIZATION OUR HERITAGE JOURNAL 6.6 2020
OF EEG SIGNALS BY VARIOUS
ATTRIBUTES FOR ROBOT
CONTROL 2021
ii. A STUDY OF EEG SIGNALS FOR THE JOURNAL OF
ROBOTIC HANDS AND ORIENTAL RESEARCH , 7.215
AUTOMATIC CONTROL MADRAS (UGC CARE 2023
JOURNAL)
iii. BRAIN COMPUTER FOR STROKE
REHABILITATION IJAEM 7.429

3. LEKSHMI i. DETECTION: DIABETIC ARDIJEET 4.24 2023

VIKRAMAN RETINOPATHY EARLY WITH DLNN 5
MAJOR ACHIEVEMENTS/RECOGNITIONS (STUDENTS)

University II Rank Holder ENTREPRENEURSHIP INITIATIVE

(2017-2021)

Vishnu priya Sanjay H Pillai & Hemanth

Job Role :
KRAYDE software services
2018-22 BATCH

VOLLEY BALL
CHAMPIONSHIP- 2022-23
FIRST PRIZE

SPORTS & GAMES 6

MAJOR ACHIEVEMENTS/RECOGNITIONS (STUDENTS)

STUDENTS WITH HIGH CGPA

2016-2020
REGISTER NUMBER NAME CGPA
UKP16CS022 FATHIMA HUSSAIN 9.07
UKP16CS030 MEGHA RIBU 9.31
UKP16CS035 SALMA M 9.16

2017-2021
2018-22 BATCH
REGISTER NUMBER NAME CGPA
UKP17CS021 CHANDINI C S 9.01
UKP17CS049 VISHNU PRIYA C 9.98
2018-2022
REGISTER
UKP17CS005 AJMIE NAZIM 8.26
NUMBER NAME CGPA UKP17CS016 ARADHANA B S 8.48
UKP18CS058 VARSHA S 9.16
UKP18CS005 AJMI N 8.23
UKP17CS028 GOPIKA MOHAN 8.43
UKP18CS015 ARYA KANNAN 8.14 UKP17CS035 NIMMY SHAJI 8.65
UKP18CS021 CHRISTI T 8.87 UKP17CS047 VARSHA B J 8.7
DEVIKA
UKP18CS022 SANTHOSHKUMAR 8.8
UKP18CS030 IJAZ MUHAMMED N J 8.44
UKP18CS031 JAYAKRISHNAN S 8.03
UKP18CS034 KAVYA SREEHARI 8.31
7
UKP18CS052 SAURAV SANTHOSH 8
MAJOR ACHIEVEMENTS/RECOGNITIONS (STUDENTS)

8
VISION, MISSION AND PROGRAM EDUCATIONAL OBJECTIVES

VISION
To be recognized globally as a socially committed, technically skilled solution
provider for all the challenges in the real world through quality education and
research.

MISSION
M1: Provide quality education to amplify and expose the caliber of students to
excel in research and higher studies.

M2: Promote students to achieve their life long careers in Government Sectors,
Industries or to sparkle as Entrepreneurs.

M3: Upgrade with hands-on training and experience on the latest technology
updates to impart their skills and abilities into socially committed research for
prepared to compete with real-world situations.

9
VISION, MISSION AND PROGRAM EDUCATIONAL OBJECTIVES

PEO1 Excel in the computing profession.

PEO2:Solve computing problems by using the

foundation in Mathematics & engineering
fundamentals. PEO4:Have an ethical attitude,
communication skills, teamwork, leadership
skills, and multi-disciplinary approach in
PEO3:Provide solutions for real-life professional life.
problems by analyzing, designing and
creating innovative computing products.
PEO5:Relate and resolve computer
engineering issues with social awareness.

PEO6:Pursue higher studies and research in

Computer Science & Engineering.
10
PROGRAM CURRICULUM AND TEACHING – LEARNING PROCESSES

11
PROGRAM CURRICULUM AND TEACHING – LEARNING PROCESSES

Bright Students Bright and Weak students Support Processes

Peer-Peer Learning Remedial Class

Slow Learners
Encourage Them To Start-up Night Class

Awards
High CGPA , Best Project Counselling
&Outgoing students

Continues
Technical Training
Performance Monitoring

12
PROGRAM CURRICULUM AND TEACHING – LEARNING PROCESSES

Process for ensuring the quality of internal semester question

papers
Question papers are designed Question papers align with all
Tests strictly follow the
to align with the Course six levels of learning as per
academic calendar.
Outcomes of each subject. Bloom's Taxonomy.

Scrutiny assesses course outcome

contributions, question orientation, Question papers include a scrutiny
and repetition. Corrections are form verified by the stream
requested, and a modified paper is coordinator and course chairman.
submitted if needed.

Questions in each subject are categorized

The Head of the Department verifies
into knowledge, comprehension,
the question paper, accepting with
application, analysis, evaluation, and
or without modifications.
synthesis.

All course outcomes achieved

through two semester tests

13
PROGRAM OUTCOMES AND COURSE OUTCOMES

PO 1 Engineering Knowledge
PO 2 Problem Analysis
PO 3 Development of Solutions

PO 4 Conduct Investigations of Complex Problems

PO 5 Modern Tool Usage

PO 6 The Engineer and Society
PO 7 Environment and Sustainability
PO 8 Ethics
PO 9 Individual and Team Work
PO 10 Communication
PO 11 Project Management and Finance
PO 12 Life-Long Learning 14
PROGRAM OUTCOMES AND COURSE OUTCOMES

PO4 Conduct Investigations of Complex Problems:

PO5 Modern Tool Usage:

PO6 The Engineer and Society:

15
PROGRAM OUTCOMES AND COURSE OUTCOMES

PO7. • Environment and Sustainability:

PO8.
• Ethics:

PO9. • Individual and Team Work:

16
PROGRAM OUTCOMES AND COURSE OUTCOMES

PO10 Communication:

PO11
Project Management and Finance:

PO12 Life-Long Learning:

17
PROGRAM OUTCOMES AND COURSE OUTCOMES

• Apply the mathematical knowledge and skills acquired to

PSO analyze real-time engineering problems.
1

• Exploit the expertise achieved through add-on programs and

PSO hands-on experiences.
2

• Design a prototype to validate the proposed solution to the

PSO problem.
3

18
PROGRAM OUTCOMES AND COURSE OUTCOMES

PROGRAMMING IN C –CO’s

CO 1 Analyze a computational problem and develop an

algorithm/flowchart to find its solution Analyze BT 4

Develop readable* C programs with branching and looping

CO 2 statements, which uses Arithmetic, Logical, Relational or Bitwise Create BT 5
operators.

CO 3 Write readable C programs with arrays, structure or union for

storing the data to be processed Apply BT 3

Divide a given computational problem into a number of modules

and develop a readable multi-function C program by using
CO 4 recursion if required, to find the solution to the computational Create BT 6
problem

CO 5 Write readable C programs which use pointers for array

processing and parameter passing Apply BT 3
19
PROGRAM OUTCOMES AND COURSE OUTCOMES

CO-PO-PSO MAPPING

EST
102. 3 2 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 1 2 2 2 0 0
1
EST
102. 3 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 3 0 0
2

Programming EST
EST102 in C 102. 3 2 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 2 2 0 2
3
EST
102. 3 3 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 2
4
EST
102. 3 2 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 2 0 2
5

In the mapping each CO is mapped to PO’s which is defined by DQAC with high affinity
indicated by 3, medium affinity indicated by 2 and low affinity indicated by 1 and no affinity
indicated by 0 20
STUDENTS’ PERFORMANCE

Enrolment Ratio :

2022-23(CAY): 106.00
2021-22(CAY m1): 105.00
2020-21(CAY m2): 100.00

Average[(ER1+ER2+ER3)/3]: 103.66
Enrolment ratio :(N1/N)*100

N:Santioned intake of the program

N1:No:of Students Admitted in the
Program

21
STUDENTS’ PERFORMANCE

Success rate without backlogs in any semester/year of study

Latest Year of Graduation, LYG(2018-22 Batch): 0.117

0.2 Success rate without Backlogs

LYGm1(2017-21 Batch): 0.01
0.18
LYGm2(2016-20 Batch): 0.19
0.16
0.14
Average SI [(SI1+SI2+SI3)/3]: 0.13 0.12
Success index SI=(Y/X) 0.1
0.08
0.06
Y:No:of students graduated without any backlogs 0.04
X:No:of admitted students 0.02
0
LYG(2018-22) LYGm1(2017-21) LYGm2(2016-20)

Success Index Column1 Column2 22

STUDENTS’ PERFORMANCE

Success rate with backlogs in any semester/year of study

Success rate in stipulated period :

Success rate with backlogs

LYG(2018 -22 Batch): 0.29
LYGm1(2017-21 Batch): 0.34
LYGm2(2016-20 Batch): 0.57
LYGm2(2016-20)
Average SI = 0.4 0.57

LYGm1(2017-21)

Success index SI=(Y/X) 0.34

Y:No:of students graduated without LYG(2018-22)

any backlogs 0.29

0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6

X:No:of admitted students
Success Rate with Backlogs
Exponential (Success Rate with Backlogs) 23
STUDENTS’ PERFORMANCE

Academic Performance up to Third Year :

CAY(2019-23Batch) : 4.23
LYG (2018-22 Batch):7.20 API Third year
7.4
LYGm1(2017-21 Batch):6.63
7.2
7
Average API=6.06
6.8
6.6
API=X*(Y/Z) 6.4
X:Mean CGPA of all successful students
6.2
Y:Total number of successful students(Y)
6
Z:Total number of students appeared in
5.8
the examination(Z) CAY(2019-23) LYG(2018-22) LYGm1(2017-21)

API
24
STUDENTS’ PERFORMANCE

Academic Performance in second Year : 6.8

API in Second Year
6.7
CAYm3(2019-23 Batch): Average API -6.56
6.6
LYG(2018-22 Batch): 6.23 6.5
LYGm1(2017-21 Batch): 6.72
6.4

Average API[(AP1+AP2+AP3)/3]: 6.10 6.3

API=X*(Y/Z) 6.2

6.1
X:Mean CGPA of all successful students
Y:Total number of successful students(Y) 6

Z:Total number of students appeared in the 5.9

CAYm3(2019-23) LYG(2018-22) LYGm1(2017-21)
examination(Z)

25
STUDENTS’ PERFORMANCE

Placement, Higher Studies & Entrepreneurship

• Placement Index

LYG (2018-22) : 1.12 12

Placement Index
LYG (2017-21) : 0.94
10
LYG (2016-20) : 0.83
8
• Average Placement Index : 0.965
Placement index:(X+Y+Z)/N 6

Total No of Final Year Students(N) 4

No of students placed in the
companies or government sector(X) 2

No of students admitted to higher

0
studies (Y) LYG(2017-21) LYG(2016-20)

No of students turned entrepreneur in Placement Index 26

engineering/technology(Z)
STUDENTS’ PERFORMANCE

NEWS LETTER

27
FACULTY INFORMATION AND CONTRIBUTIONS

 Number of Man power

FACULTY 12
Associate Professors 1
Assistant Professors 11
No. of Faculty with Ph.D 1
Faculty pursuing Ph.D 3
Technical Staff 2

28
FACULTY INFORMATION AND CONTRIBUTIONS

 FDP/ Workshops/Conferences activities

29
FACULTY INFORMATION AND CONTRIBUTIONS

30
FACULTY INFORMATION AND CONTRIBUTIONS

• Details of regular and contractual faculties

Faculty retention

CAY m1 CAY
Description 2021- 2022-23
22
No. of Faculty 3 5
Retained
Total no. of 10
Faculty
% of Faculty
Retained 30 50

Average 40 31
FACULTY INFORMATION AND CONTRIBUTIONS

INSTITUTIONAL INVOLVEMENT

SL.NO FACULTY NAME RESPONSIBILTY

1. Dr. Syam Mohan HOD, Department R&D Coordinator,
DQAC
2. Jithin Jacob Convener IQAC, KTU Coordinator,
Linways Coordinator, AICTE In- Charge
3. Sivakumar Academic Coordinator, ISO Coordinator,
IQAC Member, DQAC Member
4. Lekshmi Vikraman Course coordinator, Skill Coordinator
5. Aiswarya S S Placement Coordinator
6. Sabira A S Student Affairs
7. Ankitha Radhakrishnan Exam Cell
8. Aparna Chandran IEDC Coordinator

32
FACILITIES AND TECHNICAL SUPPORT

PROGRAMMING
LAB 2

STAFF ROOM

33
FACILITIES AND TECHNICAL SUPPORT

CLASS ROOM

DEPARTMENT LIBRARY

34
CONTINUOUS IMPROVEMENT

SUPPORT FOR OVERALL IMPROVEMENT

Labs available beyond

Effective advisory
Remedial classes general working
system
hours

Active participation
Content beyond
of students in sports Student mentoring
syllabus
and games

Active involvement in
Student self‐
society and extension
motivated activities
activities 35
CONTINUOUS IMPROVEMENT

Weak & Bright student identification

Remedial classes (weak students)

 Internship (1 to 3 days)

 Flipped classroom for practical oriented subjects

36
CONTINUOUS IMPROVEMENT

 Technical Training (Bridge from hope to possible)

Group discussions for theory papers

37
CONTINUOUS IMPROVEMENT

 Technical Workshops

 Paper publication by Students

BATCH NO.OF PUBLICATIONS

2019-23 15
2018-22 12

38
CONTINUOUS IMPROVEMENT

CURRICULUM GAP

Senior Academicians
Alumini
Technical Experts

Curriculum Gap Employer

Faculties

Journals Researchers

39
CONTINUOUS IMPROVEMENT

IMPROVEMENT IN PLACEMENT

• Placement training: Pre-final year students

Batch No: of
Placements
2015-2019 17
2016-2020 20
2017-2021 17
2018-2022 23
2019-2023 38

40
CONTINUOUS IMPROVEMENT

Campus placement and major recruiters

41
CONTINUOUS IMPROVEMENT

IMPROVEMENT IN RESULTS

42
OBE PHILOSOPHY OF THE DEPARTMENT

PLAN

ACT OBE DO

CHECK

43
OBE PHILOSOPHY OF THE DEPARTMENT

OUTCOMES

Vision & Mission

ASSESSMENT
Institute
Continuous Level
Inputs from the Improvement
stake holders PEO
Students
Alumini
Program
Employees
Subject Planning, Level
DAB
PO/PSO Delivery &
Assessment tools
Syllabus Teaching
Teaching Learning Course Level
Methods
CO

44
OBE PHILOSOPHY OF THE DEPARTMENT

PROCESS OF DEFINING VISION & MISSION

Stake Holders Institution Vision & Mission

Students
Alumni Department Vision & Mission
Faculties
Parents
Employers Department Committee

IQAC

Academic Council

Satisfied
YES

Publish Vision & Mission 45

OBE PHILOSOPHY OF THE DEPARTMENT

FORMATION OF PEO’s

Suggestions and feedbacks collected from

Students, Parents, Alumni, Employers to formulate
PEO’s

DQAC formulates PEO’s

PEO’s are submitted to DAB for approval

NO If
approved

YES
PEO’s are published
46
OBE PHILOSOPHY OF THE DEPARTMENT

Social Outreach
 As part of Women cell, CSE team of girl students have given training in computer
awareness to Anganwadi teachers, housewives in nearby houses of UKFCET and
house keeping staff of UKFCET

DURATION NUMBER OF PARTICIPANTS

5 DAYS (13/3/17 TO 17/3/17) 864

47
OBE PHILOSOPHY OF THE DEPARTMENT

House Visits

 Advisors of each class regularly visit the house of their students and interact with the
family members to create a healthy bond between the staff, student and family

 These visits helps advisors to understand the family status, problems, environment of
each student better

48
OBE PHILOSOPHY OF THE DEPARTMENT

School visits

 Regularly conduct school visits to exhibit projects developed by department students

 Talks on latest technology trends are conducted

49
OBE PHILOSOPHY OF THE DEPARTMENT

DISSEMINATION OF VISION & MISSION

 LAB

 CLASS ROOM

 STAFF ROOM

 COLLEGE WEBSITE
https://www.ukfcet.ac.in/home.php

50
OBE PHILOSOPHY OF THE DEPARTMENT

CO-PO ATTAINMENT

CO Attainment PO Attainment

Direct Tool (80% ) Indirect Tool (20%)

Course Exit Survey COi*POi+COi+1*POi+COi+2*POi+…../SUM OF POi

Series I – 25 Marks
Series II – 25 Marks
Assignment – 20 Marks
Excellent and Good Response – HIGH
University Results – 30 Marks
Satisfactory and Average – MEDIUM
Poor - LOW

Level Attained
3*HIGH+2*MEDIUM+1*LOW/TOTAL NO OF STUDENTS 51
OBE PHILOSOPHY OF THE DEPARTMENT

INDIRECT TOOL ASSESSMENT

52
OBE PHILOSOPHY OF THE DEPARTMENT

53
OBE PHILOSOPHY OF THE DEPARTMENT

LAB EXPERIMENT CONDUCTION PROCESS

ACADEMIC CALENDER

SUBJECT ALLOCATION

TIME TABLE PREPARATION

LAB CYCLE PLAN

VERIFIED
BY HOD
YES
CONTINUOUS LAB EVALUATION

OBSERVATION & RECORD WRITING

54
CONTINUOUS LAB EVALUATION
OBE PHILOSOPHY OF THE DEPARTMENT

DAILY ASSESSMENT SAMPLE

55
OBE PHILOSOPHY OF THE DEPARTMENT

PROJECT EVALUATION RUBRICS

No: Parameters Marks

1 Novelty of idea, and Implementation scope 5
[Group Evaluation]

2 Effectiveness of task distribution among team members. 5

[Group Evaluation]

3 Adherence to project schedule. 5

[Group Evaluation]

4 Interim Results. 5
[Group assessment]

5 Presentation [Individual assessment] 5 56

OBE PHILOSOPHY OF THE DEPARTMENT

SOCIALLY COMMITTED PROJECTS

 Diabetic retinopathy detection using deep learning

 A CNN based machine learning model for autism prediction using image
processing
57
OBE PHILOSOPHY OF THE DEPARTMENT

FEEDBACK SYSTEM

FEEDBACK
SYSTEM

STUDENT ALUMINI PARENT TEACHER

FEEDBACK FEEDBACK FEEDBACK FEEDBACK

College Level- Department

Infrastructure & Level- Teaching
Support System Learning Process

Mid- Semester End of Semester

Feedback Feedback
58
OBE PHILOSOPHY OF THE DEPARTMENT

INDUSTRIAL VISIT

2020-24
VISITED POWEREL TECHNOLOGIES , BANGALORE

2019-23
VISITED THE SERC (SUPERCOMPUTER EDUCATION & RESEARCH CENTRE)

2018-22 BATCH
VISITED EMBANK FLODATA

2017 -21 BATCH

VISITED SEO EXECUTIVE OF SPECTRUM SOFTTECH SOLUTIONS

59
OBE PHILOSOPHY OF THE DEPARTMENT

Centralised Teaching learning

HOD

HOD

DAB

60

DQAC

60
OBE PHILOSOPHY OF THE DEPARTMENT

CONCLUSION

 Teaching‐learning process is in alignment with the norms of the affiliated

university. The department attempts different interactive, student centric and
innovative approaches in education.
 Special focused efforts are made to improve research culture in faculty and
students.
 Students are encouraged to participate in co‐curricular and extension
activities to make them socially committed citizens. Faculties are actively
involved to support their activities.

The Department of Computer Science & Engineering is committed to serve the

society through moulding engineers who can face the challenges in life, keeping
the moral and ethical values intact.

61
62

62