Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Introduction To Malaysian Incorporation and Business Entity
Introduction To Malaysian Incorporation and Business Entity
TO MALAYSIAN NAME:
MUHAMMAD FAIQ BIN
INCORPORATION HAWARI
ID:
ENTITY
EFFECTS OF INCORPORATION
• Based on Section 16 (5) of Abdul Aziz bin Atan & 87 Ors. v.
Companies Act 1965 Ladang Rengo Malay Estate Sdn. Bhd.
1. The company has a Fact: All the shareholders of the company
separate legal entity sold and transferred their entire shares to a
distinct from its members certain buyer. The question arose in the
• Company: Artificial legal dispute was whether the estate was sold
person, recognised by the and if so whether a change of employer
law as having powers and took place
liability like an individual Held: that an incorporated company did not
change its personality or identity even
though all of shares have been transferred
to the new owner
EFFECTS OF INCORPORATION
2. May sue and be sued in his own name
• Company having legal personality, only itself can enforce its right.
Foss v. Harbottle
Fact:
Two shareholders of a company brought action against directors of the
company for misapplication and improper use of the company’s property
Held:
As the injury complained of was injury to the company, the members
could not take action. Only the company had the right to sue.
EFFECTS OF INCORPORATION
3. It has perpetual succession
• Company continues to exist until dissolved according to law or struck off by
registrar
Re Neol Tedman Holdings Pty Ltd
Fact:
Company had a husband and wife as its only shareholders and directors. They
dies in an accident and was survives by an infant child. The problem that arose
was the shares could not be transferred as according to the will of the deceased
to the infant child.
Held:
The court allowed the personal representatives of the deceased to appoint
directors of the company, so that these directors could allow the transfer of
shares to the child.
EFFECTS OF INCORPORATION
4. Power to own property
• Company can own property, which does not belong to the members or
shareholders.
Macaura v. Nothern Assurance Co. Ltd
Fact:
Macaura sold all his timber to a company in which he held majority of shares.
He took out fire insurance in his own name. when the timber was destroyed by
fire, Macaura claimed compensation from the insurance company.
Held:
Macaura had no right to claim because when he sold the timber to the
company, he had given up his interest in it. Then timber was the property of
the company and Macaura no longer had insurable interest in it.
EFFECTS OF INCORPORATION
5. The liability of its members is limited
• Company is liable for its own debts and obligations, not the members
Unlimited Limited
By
By Shares
Guarantee
Public
Private
DIFFERENCES BETWEEN A COMPANY,
PARTNERSHIP AND SOLE PROPRIETORSHIP
Sole Proprietorship Partnership Companies
Structure Individual in business on his Two or more persons Company is a person separate
own from its members
Asset Personal property of the owner Personal property of all partners Separate legal entity
Registration Registrar of Business under Registrar of Business under ROBA Registrar of Companies under
ROBA 1956 1956 Companies Act 1965
Composition One person Two to twenty but no ceiling for No maximum number but for
professional firm private company limit to 50
Constitutions No agreement needed May be form orally or in writing Must be constituted in writing
(by memorandum and article)
Liability Unlimited liability Unlimited liability Limited liability
Dissolution Dissolved informally by the sole Dissolved informally e.g by Striking off
proprietor himself agreement of the partners Winding up and liquidation