Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Shopper Marketing GFK OJO
Shopper Marketing GFK OJO
Agenda
► How it works?
GfK Consumer Tracking SimIT 2011
Potential tactics:
Retailer Manufacturer
Price negotiation
Loading in promotions
Holding back information
GfK Consumer Tracking SimIT 2011
Category Managment
ECR approach to selling
Retailer Manufacturer
Consumer
GfK Consumer Tracking SimIT 2011
Retailer Strategy
Category Definition
Classical Category
Category Role
Management process
Category Assessment established by ECR
Performance Targets
Category Strategies
Category Tactics
Review
Implementation Plan
GfK Consumer Tracking SimIT 2011
••IHsotwheisstehgemceantetagtoiorny
• Where are the opportunities?
p•mearnfo
What argthe
are meiabusiness
nbgleagaobjectives
anidnst it‟sand
Performance Targets pmoeare
how taesthey
nutirato
albbe
?le?
measured?
•Need for new approaches and data in CM, focus on shopper insight (HH-
panel data, qualitative data)
GfK Consumer Tracking SimIT 2011
• shows not only the current (Sales-) situation, but also the
Potential of customers!
?
in comparison to its competitors?
Category Definition
GfK SimIT
Category Assessment
Category Review
Performance Targets
Efficient Store Assortment
(Assortment Optimiser)
Category Strategies Parfitt Collins
Distribution of price
frequencies,
Category Tactics Launch Analyses, etc.
ABS analyses: Price
Implementation Plan Performance Planner,
Price Point Analysis, Shopping
Missions
GfK Consumer Tracking SimIT 2011
How it works?
GfK Consumer Tracking SimIT 2011
Types of shoppers:
$ $
$ $
$ $
- Shoppers Non-Kaufland-Shopper
(who buy Coffee) (who buy Coffee)
GfK Consumer Tracking SimIT 2011
(3) …the shoppers who by the category in the store are more loyal to the store
How much of the total coffee turnover is “visiting” the stores of a particular retailer?
The potential turnover = Propensity
How many of the potential buyers are actually buying coffee in the particular retailer?
The actual buyers = Closure rate
Which amount of the potential turnover is actually spend in the stores of a particular retailer?
The actual turnover = Loyalty
GfK Consumer Tracking SimIT 2011
Category spend 100,- € 100,- € 100,- € 0,- € 100,- € 100,- € 100,- € 0,- €
Spend at 25€
Kaufland
100€ 0€
Loyalty in store
Propensity
65,5%
50%
Loyalty
42%
GfK Consumer Tracking SimIT 2011
Buy FMCG
Buy category at
Not buy category at retailer
retailer
Share of Trade of a retailer is the result of shopper loyalty and their buying intensity within
the
category. These aspects are not accounted for in the classic approach.
GfK Consumer Tracking SimIT 2011
Example Retailer X
21,4
Propensity in%
18,5 15,7
13,2
11,8 10,8 Loyalty in %
Share of Trade
FMCG Juices&Drinks Dairy Products
80
60
Tea
40
Fruit Juices &
Coffee total Non Carb. Drinks
Relative Loyalty
20 Chocolate bars
0
-15 -10 -5 0 5 10 15
Yellow Fats
-40
Build Basket Review the whole category
Fresh Cheese
Gain new shoppers
-60
Relative
Propensity
100
80
60 E’Leclerc
Tesco
Auchan
40
Real
Relative Loyalty
20 Carrefour
0
-15 -10 -5 0 Hypernova 5 10 15
-20
-40
Build Basket Review the whole category
Gain new shoppers
-60
Relative
Propensity
*Size of bubble: spending of chain buyers for selected category everywhere
GfK Consumer Tracking SimIT 2011
• Retailers shoppers spend a lot on the category, probably more than what the retailer can see in
• Propensity is always a function of the total importance (= number of stores, total sales) of a retailer
• You hence cannot directly compare the absolute propensity of retailers (i.e. higher means better)
• If you want to compare retailers use relative propensity (vs. FMCG or vs. category you are looking at)
• Loyalty can be compared directly as it is independent from the importance of the retailer
• It is still sometimes useful to use relative loyalty (e.g. is a brand performing better in comparison to
the
category)
GfK Consumer Tracking SimIT 2011
=
Improvement of Loyalty
GfK Consumer Tracking SimIT 2011
Assortment Promotion
Placement
Price
GfK Consumer Tracking SimIT 2011
Missing opportunities
- An analysis which gives information to which retailer the losses of value of a given retailer
went to. In other words where the shoppers of a given retailer are buying outside
the retailer.
Misssing opportunity share: how much of total sepndings outside the retailer is covered
by particular retailer (recipient).
Affinity Index: missing opportunity share/ market share w/o analysed reatiler (fair share)
•Price Index shows the actual prices the store shoppers have paid for a category/brand,
when the by it in the store compared to what the paid for the same category brand in other
stores.
• It shows how price sensitive the category/brand is for the store.
• Calculation:
Missing opportunity
- = balance
GfK Consumer Tracking SimIT 2011
47
PERFORMANCE
ANALYSIS:
Pingodoce
Spend anywhere (spendings on category in the analysed retailer and outside the retailer): among
analyzed retailers, shoppers of C4 spend most on Water anywhere (bubble size)
Shopper loyalty index (shopper loyalty in Mineral Water vs. shopper loyalty in FMCG): Pingodoce, Tesco,
Real are underperforming in terms of loyalty (spendings on Water)
Propensity index (Propensity in Water vs. Propensity in FMCG): Pingodoce and Auchan shoppers have
much higher potential in Water compared to Tesco and Real shoppers
GfK Consumer Tracking SimIT 2011
All analyzed brands (except for Private Label) have positive shopper loyalty index which means that
Mineral Water has relatively high share of their purchases
The highest potential index shows Nałęczowianka and Ustronianka which means that Pingodoce shoppers are
interested in buying these brands however the loyalty index for Nałęczowianka is low -> Pingodoce should
focus on this brand to improve its position on Water market
GfK Consumer Tracking SimIT 2011
51
go to?
GfK Consumer Tracking SimIT 2011
Missing opportunity (spendings of analysed retailer shoppers outside the retailer): Pingodoce shoppers
spent on Water in Kaufland over 61 M PLN
Missing opportunity share (share of recipient retailers in the analysed retailer shoppers spendings
outside the retailer): Kaufland accounts for about 6% of Pingodoce shoppers spendings on Water outside
Pingodoce.
Affinity index (missing opportunity share vs. market share w/o analyzed retailer - fair share): the
losses of Pingodoce in were higher than expected on terms of analysed hypermarkets
GfK Consumer Tracking SimIT 2011
Missing opportunity share (share of recipient retailers in the analysed retailer shoppers spendings
outside the retailer): Kaufland accounts for about 6% of Pingodoce shoppers spendings on Water outside
Pingodoce.
Price index (price per unit paid by analysed retailer shoppers in recipient retailer vs price per unit paid by
analysed retailer shoppers in analysed retailer): the losses of Pingodoce to Kaufland are determined by
lower prices
GfK Consumer Tracking SimIT 2011
Pingodoce
Demographical profile allows to compare the importance of shoppers group of a retailer vs. Total Trade e.g. for
Pingodoce the most important group in terms of spendings is from biggest cities, whereas for Total Trade are
the rural communities