Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 17

Enhanced phytoremediation

of volatile environmental
pollutants with transgenic
trees
A Research Review on Genetically
Modified Plants
INTRODUCT
ION
Scientists have seen the potential of growing plants
that are able to take up groundwater pollutants
through their roots in order to clean up
contaminated areas since the 90’s.
Phytoremediation uses plants to clean up
contaminated environments. Plants can help clean
up many types of contaminants including metals,
pesticides, explosives, and oil. One of these plants is
the Poplar tree.
The genus Populus contains many fast-growing tree
species that are well suited for phytoremediation
because of their rapid growth, extensive root
systems, high water uptake, and amenability to
transformation.
INTRODUCTION
One limitation with some forms of
phytoremediation is that plants can
move pollutants from the ground and
transpire them unaltered into the air
that is still harmful.
This study reports on the development
of the first transgenic trees with
enhanced phytoremediation
capabilities for removing and degrading
several of the most widespread and
dangerous pollutants from water and
air.
OBJECTIVES

Specifically it sought to test on the


The study’s main objective is following aspects:
to develop a transgenic Increased Metabolism of TCE in Poplar
Poplar Trees as a novel
approach to enhance Expression of CYP2E1 Transgene
phytoremediation for the
removal of a wide range of
Removal of Pollutants from Water
environmental pollutants
from water and air. Removal of Pollutants from Air
METHODOLO
Materials/Equipments:
GY
• Poplar cuttings Chemicals:
• Vector
• Hydroponic solutions containing TCE
• PCR machine
• 40ml clear Volatile Organics Analysis (VOA) vials
• Chloroform extract from hexane and
sodium chloride
• Incubator
• CYP2E1 Transgenic • 10% commercial bleach and 1%
iodophor
• Plasmid pSLD50-6, containing the rabbit CYP2E1 cDNA gene
• Agrobacterium tumefaciens • 0.1% mercuric chloride
• Murashige and Skoog tissue culture medium • 14 ml of ½× Hoagland’s solution
• 10ml beaker • Carbon Tetrachloride
• 250ml flask
• Benzene-saturated water
• 4-inch pots of soil
• 10-inch-diameter Pyrex glass dessicator.
• Vinyl chloride
• Cotton
• Aluminum foil
• Syringe
METHODOLO
GY
To genetically manipulate the poplar plants and make them produce more cytochrome P450,
scientists clone a gene from rabbits and then insert it into the Poplar cells. The gene is inserted
by using bacteria called Agrobacterium tumefaciens, which is able to insert DNA into plant cells.
Then, those changed cells are used to grow whole poplar plants in the laboratory. Cytochrome
P450 breaks down the trichloroethylene by replacing the three chlorine Atoms with hydrogen
atoms. The now free chloride ions (Cl-) remain dissolved in the Water inside the plants and the
newly formed, harmless molecule is called ethylene. Ethylene is a plant hormone, which controls
the ripening of fruit and other processes, So it does not harm the plant or the environment.
METHODOLO
GY
Step 1. Construction of Step 2. Expression of CYP2E1 Step 3. TCE Metabolism
Transgenic Poplar Lines Transgene in Hybrid Poplar Experiments

Step 6. Carbon Tetrachloride Step 5. Chloroform Uptake Step 4. TCE Uptake


Uptake Experiments Experiments Experiments

Step 7. Volatile TCE Step 8. Volatile Benzene Step 9. Vinyl Chloride


Experiments Experiments. Experiments.

Schematic Diagram of the Steps Done in the Experiment


RESULTS AND
DISCUSSION Increased Metabolism of TCE in
Poplar
The CYP2E1-containing transgenic
cuttings had an average increased TCE
metabolism that was nearly 45-fold
greater than in the control cuttings.
Two (lines 78 and 20) of the CYP2E1
transgenic lines (from independent
transgenic events) had TCE
metabolism rates that were >100-fold
higher than in controls. The transgenic
cuttings grew normally and did not
display any adverse reaction to the TCE
or its metabolites.
RESULTS AND
DISCUSSIONExpression of CYP2E1 Transgene
Using quantitative RT-PCR to evaluate
the expression levels of the transgene
CYP2E1, they found the gene to be
highly expressed in all transgenic
plants. There was no expression of
CYP2E1 in the wild-type or null
vector plants. The transgenic plant
line CYP2E1-78 showed 3.7–4.6
times higher expression levels of
CYP2E1 when compared with other
transclones.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Removal of Pollutants from Hydroponic Solution

Cuttings from the CYP2E1 transgenic plants removed TCE from


solution at much greater rates than the cuttings from the plants that
had been transformed with the null vector. After 1 week, the null
vector and unplanted controls removed <3% of the TCE from
solution whereas the CYP2E1 transgenics removed from 51% to
91%. Analysis of the percent removal of TCE from solution showed
the controls to be significantly different from all CYP2E1 transgenic
poplar lines, with the most significant difference being between line
78 and the unplanted and null vector controls (α = 0.05, P < 0.0001
and P < 0.001, respectively). The best performing transgenic line,
line 78, removed TCE 53 times faster than did the vector control
plants, showing the highest statistical difference in uptake rate
(micrograms TCE day−1·g−1 plant wet weight) between line 78 and
the unplanted and null vector controls (α = 0.05, P < 0.003 and P <
0.008, respectively).
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

The Removal Rates of Chloroform by


Transgenic plants 28 and 20
Compared with Null Vector Control
Plants

In 1 week, the transgenic plants


removed 99% of the chloroform
compared with only 18–20% removed
by the controls (Fig. 3). The removal
rate was increased from 0.02 μg of
chloroform h−1·g−1 plant wet weight
by the vector control plants to an
average of 0.17 by the CYP2E1
transgenic lines, a 9-fold improvement.
RESULTS AND
DISCUSSION
The Removal Rates of Carbon
Tetrachloride by Transgenic Lines 78
and 20 Compared with Null Vector
Control Plants.

The removal rate of carbon tetrachloride


increased. After 1 week of exposure, the
CYP2E1 plants removed 92–94% of
the carbon tetrachloride compared
with 10–22% by the controls (Fig. 4).
Therefore, increased metabolism of
these P450 2E1 substrates in poplar
resulted in an increased removal of the
pollutant from solution.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Removal Rates of Vinyl Chloride by transgenic line 78


Cuttings from control and CYP2E1 plants were exposed to gaseous vinyl
chloride. In 5 days, an average of 49% of the vinyl chloride was
removed by the CYP2E1 cuttings compared with an average of 29% by
the vector control cuttings. The CYP2E1 transgenic poplar cuttings (line
78) had an initial uptake rate of 1.9 ± 0.4 μg of vinyl chloride
h−1·g−1 plant wet weight, compared with a rate of 0.61 ± 0.16 μg for the
control cuttings. This 3-fold increased rate of vinyl chloride by the
CYP2E1 line 78 cuttings was statistically significant (P < 0.01).
RESULTS AND
DISCUSSION

Removal of Pollutants from Air


The CYP2E1 plants removed 79% of the TCE from the air. During the same period, null vector
control plants did not show any statistically significant uptake of TCE compared with the
unplanted soil control. Benzene was also removed by these transgenic cuttings at an increased
rate. The CYP2E1 cuttings removed 0.28 μg of benzene h−1·g−1 plant wet weight compared with
0.025 for the null vector control plants. In 2 weeks, the control plants removed an average of only
13% of the benzene from air compared with 36% and 46% by two independent CYP2E1 plant
lines.
DISCUSSI The study has proven that transgenic poplar
trees were able to remove 100 times more TCE
ON from water than the unaltered plants, removed
99% of the chloroform compared with only 18–
Expression of the CYP2E1 20% removed by the controls, removed 92–94%
gene was sufficient to of the carbon tetrachloride compared with 10–
confer greatly increased 22% by the controls, removed an average of 49%
removal TCE, vinyl of the vinyl chloride compared with an average
chloride, carbon of 29% by the vector control cuttings, removed
tetrachloride, chloroform, 79% of the TCE from the air while null vector
and benzene, all of which control plants did not show any statistically
are substrates of significant uptake of TCE compared with the
cytochrome P450 2E1. unplanted soil control. In benzene removal,
control plants removed an average of only 13% of
the benzene from air compared with 36% and
46% by two independent CYP2E1 plant lines .
CONCLUSION
The use of transgenic plants can reduce the known risk of having
carcinogens and other hazardous pollutants in the environment. The
study has proven that CYP2E1 gene was expressed in these plants was
sufficient to confer greatly increased removal of pollutants. Therefore,
this genetically modified plants can be used to reduce pollutants
from water and air at higher rates compared to unaltered plants.
To determine whether the improvements seen in these laboratory
studies will ultimately lead to enhanced phytoremediation, field studies
are needed.
While the results are promising, additional studies are needed to
ensure that plant tissues do not cause unacceptable impacts on non-
target organisms since these plants are genetically altered and we’re
still not yet conducted outside the laboratory.
REFERENCES
Doty, S. L., James, C., Moore, A., Vajzovic, A., Singleton, G. L., Ma, C., . . . Strand,
S. E. (2007). Enhanced phytoremediation of volatile environmental pollutants with
transgenic trees. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United
States of America, 104(43), 16816–16821. Retrieved from
https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0703276104

Käser, A. E. G., & van den Bold, H. (2016). Retrieved from


https://www.google.com/url?
sa=t&source=web&rct=j&opi=89978449&url=https://www.gkgbs.ch/unterricht/
immersion/term-papers-biology/4ef-2016/gm-plants-to-save-our-world.pdf/
download&ved=2ahUKEwjl0rT-h-qBAxUT-
zgGHTfQAWIQFnoECCQQAQ&usg=AOvVaw0JADrK2hu3hvr3RRkv3LEh

You might also like