Professional Documents
Culture Documents
TOS Multiple Choice Test Guidelines Sarominez
TOS Multiple Choice Test Guidelines Sarominez
“
At the end of the session, the participants are
expected;
To demonstrate knowledge and skills on
constructing A multiple-choice formative and
summative test items and table of specifications in
SCIENCE following the standards and guidelines
within the student's level across grade levels
Enabling Objectives
“
1. Prepare a Table of Specification for
quarterly assessment; and
2. Construct a multiple-choice formative and
summative test items across grade levels
Session Objectives
“
1. Discuss the characteristics of formative
and summative assessments
2. Show model of a Table of Specification
following the SOLO Model for a
multiple-choice test.
3. Use the guidelines and standards in
constructing a multiple-choice test.
1. What are the things that you do when
preparing to write your test items?
Weight %
Total
Topic
NOI POI NOI POI NOI POI NOI POI NOI POI NOI POI
Time Spent/
adjust
actual
ed
investigate the
relationship between
Newton’s the amount of force
28.57 6,7,8, 18,19,
Laws of applied and the mass of 10 14.29 14 4 3 2 31,32 5 46-50 14.00
% 9 20
Motion the object to the amount
of change in the object’s
motion S8FE-Ia-15
Infer that when a body
exerts a force on
another, an equal 28.57 21,22,
Forces and 10 14.29 14 2 1,2 2 10,11 3 4 33-36 3 41-43 14.00
amount of % 23
Motion
force is exerted back on
it
Identify and explain the
Potential factors that affect 28.57 12,13, 24,25,
10 14.29 14 2 3,4 3 3 4 37-40 2 44-45 14.00
and Kinetic potential and kinetic % 14 26
Energy energy
3
2. What are the things that you consider
when writing your test items?
• Learning objectives
• Curriculum/national standards
• Needs of students
• Higher order thinking skills
• Test length
• Test instruction
• Test layout
• Scoring
3. What further steps do you do after you
have scored and recorded the test papers?
• Item analysis
• Item difficulty
• Item discrimination
• Distracter analysis
• Reliability analysis
• Validity analysis
ITEM A NALYSIS WITH MPS, FREQUENCY OF ERRORS A ND MASTERY L EVEL
cr eated b y an d p asswo r d : cr esel d a
Instruction: Enter the number of students took the test/exam and count the number of students answered correctly per item. Fill in also the number of items.
Freq u en c y o f Erro rs Mas t ery L ev el
No . o f No . o f
Co mp et en c y
S t u d en t s
An s wered
S t u d en
got
t s No .
I t em
Remark s % Remark s GRAPH
Co rrec t l y u n c o rrec t
an s wer
1 53 2 Minimal Errors 96 Mastered
2 52 3 Minimal Errors 95 Mastered
54
3
4 46
1
9
Minimal Errors
Minimal Errors
98
84
Mastered
Mastered
Mastery Level
5 11 44 Further Errors 20 Not Mastered 30 26
6 35 20 Marginal Errors 64 Least Mastered 25
7 32 23 Marginal Errors 58 Not Mastered
20
8 45 10 Minimal Errors 82 Mastered
15 12
9 21 34 Further Errors 38 Not Mastered 9
10 47 8 Minimal Errors 85 Mastered 10
11 45 10 Minimal Errors 82 Mastered 5 2
12 7 48 Further Errors 13 Not Mastered 0
13 40 15 Marginal Errors 73 Least Mastered N ot Lea st N ea rly Ma stered
14 38 17 Marginal Errors 69 Least Mastered Ma stered Ma stered Ma stered
15 6 49 Further Errors 11 Not Mastered
16 40 15 Marginal Errors 73 Least Mastered
17 40 15 Marginal Errors 73 Least Mastered
18 39 16 Marginal Errors 71 Least Mastered
19 53 2 Minimal Errors 96 Mastered M A STERY L EVEL
20 6 49 Further Errors 11 Not Mastered 1-59% 1 Not M astered 26
21 12 43 Further Errors 22 Not Mastered 60-74%
w ith hidden 60 Least M astered 12
formula
22 18 37 Further Errors 33 Not Mastered 75-79% 75 Nearly M astered 2
23 0 55 Further Errors 0 # N/A 80-100% 80 M astered 9
24 35 20 Marginal Errors 64 Least Mastered TOTA L 49
25 21 34 Further Errors 38 Not Mastered
26 9 46 Further Errors 16 Not Mastered
27
28
40
44
15
11
Marginal Errors
Marginal Errors
73
80
Least Mastered
Mastered
Frequency of Errors
29 43 12 Marginal Errors 78 Nearly Mastered 30
26
30 43 12 Marginal Errors 78 Nearly Mastered 25
31 33 22 Marginal Errors 60 Least Mastered
32 27 28 Further Errors 49 Not Mastered 20
16
33 9 46 Further Errors 16 Not Mastered 15
34 34 21 Marginal Errors 62 Least Mastered
10 8
35 14 41 Further Errors 25 Not Mastered
5
36 28 27 Further Errors 51 Not Mastered 0
37 35 20 Marginal Errors 64 Least Mastered 0
38 10 45 Further Errors 18 Not Mastered N o Error Mini ma l Ma rg inal Further
39 13 42 Further Errors 24 Not Mastered E rrors E rrors E rrors
40 37 18 Marginal Errors 67 Least Mastered
41 8 47 Further Errors 15 Not Mastered
42 7 48 Further Errors 13 Not Mastered
43 27 28 Further Errors 49 Not Mastered
44 6 49 Further Errors 11 Not Mastered FREQUECY OF ERRORS
45 25 30 Further Errors 45 Not Mastered 0 0 No Error 0
46 20 35 Further Errors 36 Not Mastered 1-10
w ith hidden 1 M inim al Errors 8
formula
.11-24 11 M arginal Errors 16
47 10 45 Further Errors 18 Not Mastered
48 9 46 Further Errors 16 Not Mastered 25-50 25 Further Errors 26
49 23 32 Further Errors 42 Not Mastered TOTA L 50
50 13 42 Further Errors 24 Not Mastered
Diagnosing Identifying
learners’ Before learners’ difficulty
learning instruction and
problem misconceptions
Making
Checking instructional
learning During decision :
review, re-teach,
progress instruction remediate or
enhance
Characteristics of FA: Ongoing and continuous
Checking achievement of
objectives
• Learners diversity;
Varied in • Quizzes, discussions, recitations,
Format observations, projects,
interactive activities, etc.
Characteristics of formative
assessment
Timely • immediate
Assessment Road Map
Formative Summative
Assessment Assessment
D. 82.00 Key
BUS FARE 20%
MEALS &
SNACKS 55%
FORMS OF MULTIPLE-CHOICE ITEM.
1. Correct answer variety. This variant of the
multiple-choice format has a key that is
absolutely correct and distracters that are
incorrect.
Ex. Who invented the sewing machine?
A. Fulton C. Singer
B. Howe D. Whitney
2. Best Answer Variety. This variant has two or more
suggested responses that are totally correct, correct to
some degree, or totally wrong.