Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Themes of Poverty and Inequality
Themes of Poverty and Inequality
Themes of Poverty and Inequality
Situational Poverty
This is generally caused by a
crisis or loss and is often
temporary.
• Environmental disasters,
• Divorce/Separation
• Severe health problems.
• Economic Situation
Types of Poverty
Generational Poverty
This occurs in families
where at least two
generations have been
born into poverty.
Types of Poverty
Absolute poverty
This involves a scarcity of
such basic needs as
shelter, running water, and
food. Families who live in
absolute poverty tend to
focus on day-to-day
survival.
Types of Poverty
Rural Poverty
This occurs in nonmetropolitan
areas with populations in rural
areas with low population
densities. Rural poverty often
includes lack of access to basic
infrastructure like healthcare,
education, and public services
compared to urban areas. Rural
jobs also tend to pay less.
Types of Poverty
Urban Poverty
Poverty in towns, cities or
metropolitan areas. Urban poverty
can include overcrowded housing,
limited access to healthy foods,
higher crime rates, and fewer job
opportunities for those lacking
skills or education.
Types of Poverty
Relative Poverty
This refers to the
economic status of a
family whose income is
insufficient to meet its
society's average
standard of living.
Poverty Traps
A poverty trap is a spiraling mechanism which forces
people to remain poor. There are several factors that
would pin a family or population down to poverty!
Poverty Traps
How can a country loose itself from poverty traps?
GNP differs from GDP - Gross Domestic Product measures only what
was physically produced within a country's borders in a year by
anyone.
The simple difference is:
-GNP counts what a country's people & companies produce globally
-GDP counts what was produced physically only within the country's
borders
Methods in Measuring Development
Population growth
Population growth refers to the increase in the number of
people living within a specified geographic area, such as a city,
region, country, or the world. It is measured over a specific
time period, often annually or decade-to-decade.
Factors of Population Growth:
• Human Capital-Refers to what existing jobs are common
in one country!
• Consumption Patterns-What identified products are
consumed by an individual!
The Lens: Let’s go babies in the PH!
According to the latest data from the Philippine Statistics Authority (PSA), there are an estimated
1,668 babies born every hour in the Philippines as of 2022.
The PSA states that the total projected number of live births in the Philippines in 2022 is 1,584,000.
This averages out to about:
So, on average, approximately 1,668 babies are born every 60 minutes in the Philippines this year.
Reference:
Philippine Statistics Authority - Latest official population projections in the Philippines (2022):
https://psa.gov.ph/content/latest-official-population-projections-philippines-2022
Methods in Measuring Development
Labor Force Growth
Labor force growth refers to how the proportions of Simple Assumption: As
workers employed across different occupations and time passes by, jobs
sectors changes as an economy develops over time. from AGRICULTURE
Government policies highly influence changes that TO MODERN DAY
would force individuals to change course of jobs.
JOBS are becoming
more common.
Labor tends to shift from predominantly occupying
jobs in low-productivity primary industries
towards higher-productivity jobs in secondary and
tertiary sectors.
Structure of the Labor Force growth:
As a demonstration, between 1978-2010, the occupational composition of
labor in Peoples Republic of China underwent substantial change:
• Primary sector jobs like agriculture, fishing and mining declined sharply
from 28% to 7% of the labor force over this 30-year period due to
technology upgrades and productivity gains requiring less labor.
• Secondary sector jobs in manufacturing, construction and utilities grew in
earlier years but stabilized at around 25% share by 2010 as China automated
and increased capital intensity.
• But tertiary service jobs expanded rapidly from 46% to 68% of workers,
driven by development of high skilled services like IT, finance, healthcare,
retail and hospitality sectors catering to a wealthier population.
Methods in Measuring Development
Urbanization Simple Assumption: Imagine a small rural area
with 100 people living there.
Urbanization is the Over time, more opportunities arise in the nearby
city, so people from the village start moving there
cumulation of a country's for jobs.
population who live in After 20 years, 80 of those original 100 villagers
have moved to the city, while only 20 remain in
urban areas. the village.
This process of people moving from rural areas
into cities is urbanization. As more people
concentrate in urban cities, the percentage of the
overall population living in urban areas goes up.
Methods in Measuring Development
Consumption per Simple Assumption: Fruit as a
control consumption variable.
capita
Consumption per capita Imagine a country with 3 people in
total. Each week, Person A buys 10
is the yearly use of apples. Person B buys 5 oranges.
goods and services by Person C buys two bunches of
each person in a country. bananas.
REMEMBER!
All the scores are averaged to get the
overall HDI. A country with a higher
HDI means people live longer, get
more schooling, and earn more
money. A lower score means the
opposite.
REFERENCE: United Nations Development
Programme. (n.d.). Data center: Country insights.
Retrieved from
https://hdr.undp.org/data-center/country-insights#/ranks
REFERENCE: United Nations Development
Programme. (n.d.). Data center: Country insights.
Retrieved from
https://hdr.undp.org/data-center/country-insights#/ranks
REFERENCE: United Nations Development
Programme. (n.d.). Data center: Country insights.
Retrieved from
https://hdr.undp.org/data-center/country-insights#/ranks
REFERENCE: United Nations Development
Programme. (n.d.). Data center: Country insights.
Retrieved from
https://hdr.undp.org/data-center/country-insights#/ranks
REFERENCE: United Nations Development
Programme. (n.d.). Data center: Country insights.
Retrieved from
https://hdr.undp.org/data-center/country-insights#/ranks
REFERENCE: United Nations Development
Programme. (n.d.). Data center: Country insights.
Retrieved from
https://hdr.undp.org/data-center/country-insights#/ranks
REFERENCE: United Nations Development
Programme. (n.d.). Data center: Country insights.
Retrieved from
https://hdr.undp.org/data-center/country-insights#/ranks
The New Human Development Index (HDI)
REMEMBER!
Assumptions:
Assumptions:
If wealth was evenly distributed, the
curve would be a straight diagonal
line. This would show that, for
example, the bottom 50% of people
have 50% of the total wealth.
Measuring income inequality and
growth: Lorenz Curve!
Assumptions:
But when wealth is not evenly
distributed, the curve sags down
below this diagonal line. How far the
curve sags down shows how uneven
the distribution is. If the curve sags
very far down, it means there is high
inequality - most of the wealth is
held by a small percentage of people.
Measuring income inequality and
growth: Lorenz Curve!
REMEMBER:
So, the main thing about the Lorenz
curve is that the more the curve sags
below the diagonal line, the more
unequal the wealth or income
distribution. It visualizes inequality
in a simple curve chart!
The graph shows the Lorenz curves of the
four countries: New Zealand, Philippines,
India, and China. The inequality of income
gap for the Philippines is less compared to
that of the three countries. China has the
widest inequality of income gap.
REFERENCE: Philippine Star Life. (2020, August 15). Income of Pinoy:
An analysis of Filipino incomes and wages. Philippine Star
FIN AND THANK YOU.
Azariadis, C., & Stachurski, J. (2005). Poverty traps. In P. Aghion & S. Durlauf (Eds.), Handbook of Economic Growth (Vol. 1,
pp. 295–384). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1574-0684(05)01006-3
Chandy, L., Ledlie, N., & Penciakova, V. (2013). The final countdown: Prospects for ending extreme poverty by 2030. Brookings
Institution. https://www.brookings.edu/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/The-Final-Countdown.pdf
Dollar, D., Kleineberg, T., & Kraay, A. (2016). Growth still is good for the poor. European Economic Review, 81, 68–85.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euroecorev.2015.05.008
Kraay, A., & McKenzie, D. (2014). Do poverty traps exist? Assessing the evidence. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 28(3),
127–148. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.28.3.127
Ostry, J. D., Berg, A., & Tsangarides, C. G. (2014). Redistribution, inequality, and growth. IMF.
https://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/sdn/2014/sdn1402.pdf
Page, J. (2012). Can Africa industrialise? Journal of African Economies, 21(2), 86-124. https://doi.org/10.1093/jae/ejr019
Sachs, J. D. (2005). The end of poverty: Economic possibilities for our time. Penguin.
REFERENCES:
Cumulative Sources:
De Janvry, A., & Sadoulet, E. (2020). Using agriculture for development: Supply- and demand-side approaches. Oxford Review
of Economic Policy, 36(1), 172–194. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxrep/grz031
Dollar, D., Kleineberg, T., & Kraay, A. (2013). Growth still is good for the poor. World Bank.
https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/10986/16204
Hall, R. E., & Jones, C. I. (1999). Why do some countries produce so much more output per worker than others? Quarterly
Journal of Economics, 114(1), 83-116. https://doi.org/10.1162/003355399555954
Lopez-Calva, L. F., & Ortiz-Juarez, E. (2014). A vulnerability approach to the definition of the middle class. Journal of
Economic Inequality, 12, 23–47. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10888-012-9240-5
Matsuyama, K. (1992). Agricultural productivity, comparative advantage, and economic growth. Journal of Economic Theory,
58(2), 317–334. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-0531(92)90055-O
Milanovic, B. (2005). Worlds apart: Measuring international and global inequality. Princeton University Press.
Sachs, J. D., McArthur, J. W., Schmidt-Traub, G., Kruk, M., Bahadur, C., Faye, M., & McCord, G. (2004). Ending Africa’s
poverty trap. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 2004(1), 117-240. https://doi.org/10.1353/eca.2004.0018