AMT30010 (2324) Zulfakar Proposal Slaid

You might also like

Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 19

AMT30010 – BACHELOR

DEGREE PROJECT
Evaluating the roles of Consultants in Construction Project
Delivery: A case study of selected projects in Selangor
Area

NAME : ZULFAKAR BIN SALEHHUDDIN


MATRIC: 201553100
SUPERVISOR : DR HILARY OMATULE ONUBI
AGENDA PROJECT OVERVIEW 01
PROJECT PROBLEMS
02
BACKGROUND OF
PROJECTS
03
AIMS AND OBJECTIVES
04
PROJECT PROCEDURE 05
06
SIGNIFICANCE OF
PROJECTS
PROJECT OVERVIEW
PROJECT PROJECT OVERVIEW
MANAGEMENT
CONSULTANT

PMC plays a crucial role in guiding projects to completion

Various industries operate on a project-based model, including management


consulting, information technology, and other segments within the construction sector.
Particularly within construction projects, contractors and project managers are highly
regarded for their significance (Adeleke et al., 2019)

Utilizing Project Management Consultancy proves highly advantageous for construction


projects, as it enhances overall project efficiency

The study aims to provide stakeholders with insights into consultants' roles and practical recommendations to
enhance project efficiency
PROJECT PROBLEMS
PROJECT
PROBLEMS
Inconsistent Project Need for Efficient Methods to
Lack of Public Management Practices Accelerate Project Timelines
Awareness
o Limited understanding of
consultants' roles and o Variability in effectiveness
responsibilities and efficiency across o Importance of timely
projects completion without
o Misconceptions and compromising quality
undervaluation of o Impact: Inconsistent
expertise outcomes, inefficient o Impact: Risk of extended
resource allocation, durations and escalated
o Impact: Hindered project potential delays, and costs without effective
guidance and efficiency” increased costs methods
BACKGROUND OF
PROJECT
Research Focus:
BACKGROUND OF
Evaluating the roles and contributions of construction
consultants in project management and delivery PROJECT
within Selangor, Malaysia.

Project List:

Bungalow Project, The Peak, Ampang


Mosque Project, Bangi Avenue
5A11 Apartment, Shah Alam

Study Scope:

Encompasses various construction projects across different sectors in


Selangor.
Employs extensive data collection methods:
1 Questionnaire
3
Document Analysis

2 Key Challenge:

Limited public exposure and understanding of consultants'


responsibilities.
AIMS AND OBJECTIVES
AIMS AND
OBJECTIVE

To analyze To evaluate current To explore best


consultant project practices related to
contribution in management accelerating project
construction project practices. timelines
management
PROJECT PROCEDURE
PROJECT PROCEDURE

Research Method: Steps Taken to Ensure Valid Research:

Identify Respondents:
Quantitative Method: Focus on individuals working with consultancy companies.
Focus on quantifying data gathering and
examination. Question Development:
Conceptualize questions regarding research focus and format.
Tools Used:
SPSS (Statistical Package for the Social Conduct Literature Review:
Sciences): Ensure accurate understanding of the research context.
Accurate result calculation.
Develop and Release Questionnaire:
Google Form: Create questionnaire based on literature review.
Medium for distributing the questionnaire. Release questionnaire for a week.

Data Collection and Analysis:

Collect responses and analyze data.


Discuss results to reach conclusions.

FLOW CHART
FLOW CHART
SIGNIFICANCE OF
PROJECT
Enhancing Efficiency: PROJECT
o Identifies areas for improved efficiency in project SIGNIFICANCE
execution Supporting Sustainable Growth:
o Potentially reduces delays and cost overruns (Smith et
al., 2024) o Informs better decision-making for stakeholders
o Attracts more investment to the construction industry
(Chen, 2021)
Raising Awareness:

o Addresses gap in public understanding of consultants'


roles Empowering Consultants:
o Highlights consultants' vital contributions to
stakeholders (Jones & Tan, 2023) o Highlights the indispensable role of consultants
o Enables consultants to advocate for their contributions
o Promotes professional development opportunities
Benchmarking Best Practices: (Wong, 2020)

o Evaluates current project management practices


o Explores best practices to set industry benchmarks Overall Impact:
(Lee, 2022) o Drives positive changes in construction project
o Encourages adoption of effective methods across the
management practices
industry o Promotes industry growth and resilience
o Serves as a model for other regions
GANTT CHART
GANTT CHART
N0 DESCRIPTION W1 W2 W3 W4 W5 W6 W7 W8 W9 W10 W11 W12 W13 W14 W15 W16 W17 W18 W19 W20 W21 W22 W23 W24 W25 W26 W27 W28
DISCUSSION OF PROJECT BETWEEN UNIVERSITY
1
SUPERVISOR, INDUSTRY COACH & STUDENT
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY OF PROJECT PROPOSAL
2
SUBMISSION
3 VETTING
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY OF PROJECT PROPOSAL APPROVAL
4
AND ANNOUNCEMENT
PROJECT PROPOSAL SUBMISSION TO UNIVERSITY
5
SUPERVISOR FOR VERIFICATION
SUBMIT VERIFIED PROJECT PROPOSAL TO COURSE
6
COORDINATOR
DISTRIBUTE VERIFIED PROJECT PROPOSAL TO APPOINTED
7
PANEL OF EXAMINERS
8 ORAL PRESENTATION: PROJECT PROPOSAL
9 PREPARATION FOR QUESTIONNAIRE
10 RELEASE THE QUESTIONNAIRE
11 ANALYZE DATA OF THE QUESTIONNAIRE
SUBMIT PROJECT REPORT (CHAPTER 1-3) TO UNIVERSITY
12
SUPERVISIOR FOR VERIFICATION
SUBMIT VERIFIED PROJECT REPORT (CHAPTER 1-3) TO
13
COURSE COORDINATOR
DISTRIBUTE VERIFIED PROJECT REPORT (CHAPTER 1-3) TO
14
APPOINTED PANEL OF EXAMINERS
PROJECT PROGRESS (CHAPTER 1-3) CHECKING BY PANEL
15
OF EXAMINERS
16 MARKS REVIEW BY FYP COMMITTEE
FIRST DRAFT OF PROJECT REPORT SUBMISSION TO
17
UNIVERSITY SUPERVISOR
FINAL DRAFT OF PROJECT REPORT SUBMISSION TO
18
UNIVERSITY SUPERVISOR FOR VERIFICATION
SUBMIT VERIFIED FINAL DRAFT OF PROJECT REPORT TO
19
COURSE COORDINATOR
DISTRIBUTE VERIFIED FINAL DRAFT OF PROJECT REPORT
20
TO APPOINTED PANEL OF EXAMINERS
21 ORAL PRESENTATION: VIVA
22 LIST OF CORRECTION
23 PROJECT REPORT CORRECTION
SUBMIT CORRECTED PROJECT REPORT TO UNIVERSITY
SUPERVISOR & SUBMIT LOG BOOK TO UNIVERSITY
24
SUPERVISOR
AND INDUSTRY COACH
UNIVERSITY SUPERVISOR VERIFICATION ON PROJECT
25 REPORT
CORRECTION
26 MARKS REVIEW BY FYP COMMITTEE
THANK
YOU

CREDITS: This presentation template was created


by Slidesgo, including icons by Flaticon, and
infographics & images by Freepik
Please keep this slide for attribution.
Q&A SESSION

You might also like