Topics of Discussion • Nuclear Parity / deterrence – What are nuclear weapons? • Types & Process • Nuclear stockpiles – What is nuclear Parity? – What is Nuclear Deterrence? • Credible Nuclear Deterrence • Types of Nuclear Deterrence Nuclear Weapons • Nuclear weapons are the most dangerous weapons on earth. One can destroy a whole city, potentially killing millions, and jeopardizing the natural environment and lives of future generations through its long- term catastrophic effects. • Used only once In Hiroshima and Nagasaki in 1945 • About 22,000 reportedly remain in our world today and there have been over 2,000 nuclear tests conducted to date According to US Department of Energy Nuclear Weapons • A nuclear weapon is a weapon that suddenly releases the energy in the nucleus of certain types of atoms. When triggered, these devices release a huge amount of energy in the form of a nuclear explosion. • There are two ways to make nuclear weapons: – Fission weapons (also called atomic bombs or A-Bomb) • Fission weapons use a special isotope of uranium or plutonium. – Fusion weapons (also called hydrogen bombs, H-Bomb or thermonuclear weapons) • Fusion weapons make bigger explosions. Fusion weapons use a special isotope of hydrogen. Fission & Fusion Gun-type design (HEU) Implosion design (plutonium or HEU)
Nuclear Weapons Process
1. Fission 2. Fusion 3. Boosted fission weapon 4. Neutron bomb 5. Radiological bomb Nuclear Parity • A condition at a given point in time when opposing forces possess nuclear offensive and defensive systems approximately equal in overall combat effectiveness. • Balance of Power = nuclear Parity? • Is Nuclear Parity required for nuclear deterrence? Yes! or NO! • Achieve Numeric Superiority • Nuclear Weapons for Political Purpose or Military Purpose? • Retaliatory Strike – second Response – Enough number of nuclear weapons to eliminate adversary completely – unacceptable damage in a retaliatory strike - the essence of the concept of mutually assured destruction – USSR made titanic efforts and achieved relative nuclear parity with the USA in the early 1970s – Arms Race & TNW http://www.armscontrol.ru/start/publications/dkp0731.htm Are nuclear weapons not weapons of war fighting? Nuclear Deterrence • Deterrence: Threat of Use of Force • Nuclear Deterrence: Threat of Use of Nuclear Force • Deterrence is a strategy intended to deter an adversary from taking an action not yet started, or to prevent them from doing something that another state desires. • The use of the power to hurt as bargaining power is the foundation of deterrence theory, and is most successful when it is held in reserve • Evolution – International system after WWII – South Asia – 1980’s Credible Nuclear Deterrence • A credible nuclear deterrent, must be always at the ready, yet never used. (Bernard Brodie) – Proportionality – Reciprocity – Coercive credibility • Credibility of Nuclear Deterrence – 2nd strike capability – C4I2R (Command, Control, Computers, Communication, Information, Intelligence, Reconnaissance) • Credible Minimum Deterrence – Parity Continuous • Direct Deterrence: Preventing armed attack against a country's own territory i.e. USA vs USSR • Extended Deterrence: Preventing armed attack against the territory of another country i.e. USA’s umbrella to Japan • Immediate Deterrence: Using deterrence against a short-term threat of attack i.e Cuban Missile Crisis, Pak vs India Types of Nuclear Deterrence • Existential Deterrence Theory: Shared realization of massive attack • Reassessed Deterrence Theory: Plans, Procedures and organization - Dismantled weapons • Classical Deterrence Theory/Rational Deterrence Theory: Strategic Parity and Strategic Stability – BOP, Realpolitik – power politics – political Realism – Equal Power distribution – Structural Deterrence Theory: Systematic relations btw great powers is maintained and costs of war are very high- Power= peace – Decision Theoretic Deterrence Theory: Preferences, Choices, and considering Miscalculations, Misperceptions and accidents • Organization Deterrence theory – behavior pattern of professional organizations (Military is important for stable deterrence) • Perfect Deterrence Theory – Non-cooperative game theory approach – Massive Retaliation/Flexible Response – Parity not Required – Minimum Credible Deterrence required Do you think this world is at Risk?