Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Equitable Jurisdiction The Nature of Equity Equity & Trust I
Equitable Jurisdiction The Nature of Equity Equity & Trust I
Introduction
Right in personam and right in rem
Maxims of Equity
Conclusion
EQUITABLE JURISDICTION
[THE NATURE OF EQUITY]
Introduction:
• The term 'equity' has many meanings even when it is used in legal language.
It is not always easy to differentiate between these different meanings but
often this is crucial. Consider some of them as: Equity as fairness or justice -
a basic doctrine that the established law or legal rules of a system ought to
be applied in such a way as to do justice or to achieve fairness; Similarly
equity is sometimes referred to as if it were a doctrine of morality or of
natural justice, embodying some basic requirement that the law is ultimately
required to do or to achieve justice in legal disputes notwithstanding the
particular legal rules expressed in statutes or in the common law; Equity as
indicating a general body of legal doctrine which emerged in England
through the practices of the Equity or Chancery Courts; Similarly equity will
sometimes be referred to in a jurisdictional sense as if it referred just to
those special types of cases which will be heard by a specialist equity court.
You will frequently read of equity as distinct from common law being used
in just this way.
EQUITABLE JURISDICTION
[THE NATURE OF EQUITY]
Introduction: (Continuation)
• Equity as indicating those circumstances where a court exercising
equitable jurisdiction feels it has a duty to intervene and to provide
certain special remedies or to remedy the operation of the common law.
For example, the court might say something like 'the plaintiff in this
case has sufficient equity to permit the court to intervene'. Equity as
indicating some sort of property or other interest which is not quite the
same as a legal or common law interest in property - but regarded as
enforceable in the equity courts. Hence, some forms of property are
called equitable property. An interest of a beneficiary under a trust or an
interest in a partnership are examples of equitable proprietary interests.
Equity as meaning simply the right to an equitable remedy such as an
injunction to restrain a breach of some wrong or an order for specific
performance of a contract (an order which requires that the contract be
carried out).
EQUITABLE JURISDICTION
[THE NATURE OF EQUITY]
Introduction: (Continuation)
• Apart from the definitional aspect of equity as part of its nature, reference could also
be made to the following points:
(1) Equity as a body of law: The application of equitable justice has gradually resulted in
the evolution of tangible equitable principles which embellish the common law by
alleviating the deficiencies of the absolute law. Thus, the most common legal
understanding of ‘equity’ today is not an intangible sense of justice, but rather a
discernable body of law, developed by the early Courts of Chancery and
administered by the modern Courts of Justice.
(2) Equity corrects the law: In its discretionary capacity, equity operates to correct the
law, not to overwhelm it. The jurisdictional foundation of equity is, as Aristotle notes,
corrective rather than distributive; it prescribes relief against the proscriptive
operation of common law.
(3) Form and substance: Whilst equitable principles were intended to alleviate
deficiencies of the common law, they still give effect to the spirit of the law. Equity is
not obliged to follow the letter of the law, where the universality of this ‘letter’
produces injustice, equitable principles follow the ‘reason and spirit’, so that
deficiencies arising from a strict literal interpretation can be corrected.
EQUITABLE JURISDICTION
[THE NATURE OF EQUITY]
Introduction: (Continuation)
• Apart from the definitional aspect of equity as part of its nature,
reference could also be made to the following points:
(4) Standard of conduct: Equity does not apply defined rules, it
evaluates specific conduct, this requires flexibility and
discretion. Most equitable principles are based upon
discretionary standards of conduct rather than definitive rules;
these standards usually stem from the basic precepts of good
faith, honesty and generosity, and in this sense are rational in
nature. The concept of ‘unconscionability’ is a good example to
cite here i.e. abusing a position or relationship of trust or
confidence; exploiting a recognised vulnerability or weakness).
EQUITABLE JURISDICTION
[THE NATURE OF EQUITY]
Conclusion:
• The nature of equity embodies the general principles which
evolved in the Court of Chancery. For example, the maxims
of equity are not rules which must be rigorously applied in
every case, but are more in the nature of general guidelines
illustrating the way in which equitable jurisdiction is
exercised. A few examples of their operation must suffice,
but they should be borne in mind when considering the
various rules and doctrines of equity.