Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Ob 2007 PG
Ob 2007 PG
ii) Economic
iii) Aesthetic
iv) Social
v) Political
vi) Religious
2.4.3. Attitudes
Attitudes are evaluative statements – either favourable or
unfavourable – concerning objects, people, or events.
They reflect how one feels about something. So, an
attitude is a predisposition to respond in a positive or
negative way to someone or something in one's
environment.
continued...
Attitude has 3 components:
Cognition (Opinion or Belief segment of an attitude),
Affect (Emotional/ Feelings segment of an attitude), and
Behavior (refers to an intention to behave in a certain way
toward someone or something)
SOURCE & IMPORTANCE OF ATTITUDES
Attitudes, like values are acquired from parents, teachers,
and peer group members.
Attitudes are modeled after those whom we admire,
respect, or maybe even fear in our early years.
In contrast to values, attitudes are less stable.
TYPES OF ATTITUDES
Most of the research in organizational behavior has been
concerned with 3 attitudes:
job satisfaction,
job involvement, and
organizational commitment.
I) ORGANIZATIONAL COMMITMENT
The degree to which an employee identifies with a
particular organization and its goals, wishes to
maintain membership in the organization is
organizational commitment.
High job involvement means identifying with one's
specific job, whereas high organizational
commitment means identifying with one's employing
organization.
II) JOB INVOLVEMENT
The degree, to which a person identifies with the job,
actively participates in it, and considers his
performance important to self – worth is job
involvement.
Employees with high level of job involvement
strongly identify with and really care about the kind
of word they do. High levels of job involvement have
been found to be related to less absenteeism and
lower resignation rates.
III) JOB SATISFACTION
The term job satisfaction refers to an individual‟s
general attitude toward his job.
A person with a high level of job satisfaction holds
positive attitude toward the job. Job satisfaction has
been treated both as a general attitude and as
satisfaction with five specific dimensions to the job:
pay, the work itself, promotion opportunities,
supervision, and coworkers.
MEASURING JOB SATISFACTION
There are several measures of job satisfaction.
Single Global Rating (SGR) and
Summation Score (SS)
DETERMINANTS OF JOB SATISFACTION
Concerned with leader effectiveness
Conducted 25 major studies
Fiedler Contingency Model:
Used to “predict leader effectiveness and to assign
leaders to specific task situations”
Fiedler...
- Concerned with Styles and Situations
- Assess Leadership Style
- Assess the Situation
- This “provides the framework for effectively matching the
leader and the situation”
Leadership Style
1.Task-motivated leaders
“primarily concerned with reaching a goal”
2.Relationship-motivated leaders
primarily “concerned with developing close interpersonal
relations”
Leadership Style: LPC Scale
Least Preferred co-worker
Low LPC:
You are task motivated
Scoring
Good or Bad?
-Task Structure
-Position Power
Strong or Weak?
Fiedler’s Contingency Model
4.3. Basic Leadership Styles
A leadership style is the manner a leader
accomplishes his/her task and handles his/her
subordinates or followers.
Leadership style is a combination of traits, skills,
and behaviours managers use to interact with
employees.
1.AUTOCRATIC OR LEADER-CENTERED LEADERSHIP
It is also called authoritarian leadership
Leader uses strong, directive, and controlling actions
to enforce the rules, regulations, activities, and
relationships in the organizations.
Provide clear expectations for what needs to be done,
when it should be done, and how it should be done
2.DEMOCRATIC OR PARTICIPATIVE LEADERSHIP
Lewin’s study found that participative (democratic)
leadership is generally the most effective leadership
style.
Democratic leaders offer guidance to group members,
but they also participate in the group and allow input
from other group members.
continued..
Participative leaders encourage group members to
participate, but retain the final say over the decision-
making process.
Group members feel engaged in the process and are
more motivated and creative.
3.LAISSEZ-FAIRE (FREE-REIN) LEADERSHIP
Delegative leaders offer little or no guidance to group
members and leave decision-making up to group
members.
While this style can be effective in situations where
group members are highly qualified in an area of
expertise, it often leads to poorly defined roles and a
lack of motivation.
FACTORS AFFECTING THE CHOICE OF LEADERSHIP STYLES
AND EFFECTIVENESS
The leader's personality
The nature of the task and the type of activities
involved
The type of people involved in the task
The expectation of the group
The relationship between the leader and the other
members of the group
continued..
The nature of the organization
Level of interaction and cooperation among the
members of the group
Commonality of objectives and goals
The level at which decisions are made
The larger environment which the organization or
group operates
Chapter 5
UNDERSTANDING & MANAGING GROUP BEHAVIOR
A group is defined as two or more individuals who
have come together to achieve particular objectives.
Groups interact and affect one another's behavior.
Group Dynamics-interaction between groups
5.1. Types of Groups
FORMAL GROUPS
-Command Groups
-Task Groups
-Team
INFORMAL GROUPS
SOCIAL STRUCTURE OF THE INFORMAL GROUP
1. Group leader
2. Regular members
3. Deviantes
4. Isolates
5.2. Group Formation & Development
Reasons for group formation
1. Common needs
2. Common Interest
3. Common goal
4. Physical proximity
5. Cultural similarity
Group development stages
1. Forming
It is characterized by much uncertainty about the group’s
purpose, structure,& leadership.
2. Storming
It is marked by interpersonal conflict as members compete for
leadership and other roles.
3. Norming
It is characterized by close relationship and cohesiveness
4. Performing
The group structure at this point is fully functional and
accepted
5. AdjourningIt is characterized by concern with wrapping up
1. Forming
Definition: Stage 1 teams are generally new teams
that are learning how to work together
Characteristics of stage 1 teams: Members tend to
be tentative and polite and to have little conflict
Critical skills and activities: Stage 1 teams need to
identify their purpose, develop group norms, identify
group processes, define roles, build relationships and
trust
Role of facilitator/leader: Stage 1 teams usually
need a strong leader who can help the team go
through its forming activities
2.Storming
Definition: Stage 2 teams have moved past the early forming
stages and are now encountering some disagreements and/or
conflict. This is natural, but teams need to find effective ways
to handle conflict before they can move on to stage 3.
Group characteristics: Members of stage 2 teams tend to
exhibit increased conflict, less conformity and “jockeying” for
power.
Critical skills and activities: Stage 2 teams need to learn how
to resolve conflict; clarify their roles, power, and structure;
and build consensus through re-visiting purpose.
Role of leader(s): Stage 2 teams need leaders and other team
members who are willing to identify issues and resolve
conflict.
3.Norming
Definition: Stage 3 teams have successfully moved out of
the storming stage and are ready to move to a higher level
of communication and problem-solving.
Group characteristics: Members of stage 3 teams
demonstrate an improved ability to complete tasks, solve
problems, resolve conflict.
Critical skills and activities: Stage 3 teams need to
learn to engage in more sophisticated problem-solving
and decision-making, continue the use of effective
strategies for conflict resolution and take greater levels of
responsibility for their roles
Role of leader(s): In stage 3, leaders become less
directive, team members feel empowered, and multiple
leaders emerge.
4.Performing
Definition: Stage 4 teams are at the highest level of
performance and can process their strengths and weaknesses
while accomplishing their goals.
Group characteristics: In stage 4, the team takes a flexible
approach to roles and structures depending on the task at
hand. The team is able to evaluate its effectiveness and views
conflict is viewed as an opportunity. Stage 4 teams tend to be
energetic, creative, and fun!
Critical skills and activities: Stage 4 teams need to hold high
expectations for their performance. They often use sub-groups
as well as the large group for decision-making and task
completion. Teams also recognize the need to ensure that all
members are in agreement with the role and purpose of sub-
groups.
Role of Leader: In a stage 4 team, it’s often difficult to identify
the leader, because everyone is sharing in leadership.
5. ADJOURNING
It is characterized by concern with wrapping up
activities rather than task performance.
The group prepares for its disbandment.
Members shift their attention from task attention to
socio-emotional focus as they realize that this
relationship is ending.
5.3. Factors That Determine Group Performance and
Satisfaction
A) EXTERNAL CONDITIONS IMPOSED ON THE
GROUP
Organizational strategy
Authority structure
Formal Regulation
Organizational resources
Personnel selection process
Performance evaluation and reward system
Organizational culture
Physical work setting
continued..
B) GROUP MEMBER RESOURCES
Abilities
Personal characteristics
continued..
C) GROUP STRUCTURE
Formal leadership
Roles
Role identity
Role perception
Role expectations
Role conflict
continued..
Norms
Group size
Status
Composition
continued..
D) GROUP COHESIVENESS
Cohesiveness is the degree to which group members
are attracted to each other and share common goals.
Members of cohesive groups have a strong desire to
stay in the group.
Attractiveness is a key ingredient in cohesiveness.
DETERMINANTS OF COHESIVENESS
Time spent together
Severity of Initiation/difficulty of entry
Group size
External threat
Previous success
Chapter 6
MANAGERIAL DECISION MAKING
Decision-making is defined as an act
of making a choice among alternative
courses of action.
6.1. Types of Decisions
Programmed decision
- are those involving routine and frequently
occurring problems determined by rule,
procedure or work experience that have
well established and understood solutions.
continued..
Non-programmed decision
- are unstructured and unique decisions that
arise from situations that are unusual and
involve changeable and unpredictable
circumstances.
DECISION MAKING CONDITIONS