Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Unit 4, Market Analysis
Unit 4, Market Analysis
MARKET ANALYSIS
By: Rupam Jyoti Deka
Assistant Professor, BVIMR
Types of Market
The nature of the commodity determines the market structure. the commodity may
be either homogeneous or identical and heterogeneous or differentiated.
A variety of market structures will characterize an economy. Such market structures
essentially refer to the degree of competition in a market.
There are other determinants of market structures such as the nature of the goods
and products, the number of sellers, number of consumers, the nature of the product or
service, economies of scale etc. We will discuss the four basic types of market structures in
any economy.
One thing to remember is that not all these types of market structures actually exist. Some of
them are just theoretical concepts. But they help us understand the principles behind the
classification of market structures.
Types of Market Structures in Economics
From the viewpoint of competition the types of
market structures in economics are the following:
1. Perfect competition
2. Monopolistic competition
3. Oligopoly
4. Duopoly
5. Monopoly
The Market Structure can be shown by the following chart:
Thus, there are two extremes of market structure. On the one hand, we have
perfect competition or pure competition and monopoly on the other hand.
The following characteristics are essential for the existence of Perfect Competition:
In perfect competition, sellers and buyers are fully aware about the
current market price of a product. Therefore, none of them sell or
buy at a higher rate. As a result, the same price prevails in the
market under perfect competition.
Under perfect competition, the buyers and sellers cannot influence the market price by increasing or
decreasing their purchases or output, respectively. The market price of products in perfect
competition is determined by the industry. This implies that in perfect competition, the market
price of products is determined by taking into account two market forces, namely market demand
and market supply.
In Figure-3, it can be seen that at price OP1, supply is more than the demand. Therefore, prices will fall down to OP. Similarly, at
price OP2, demand is more than the supply. Similarly, in such a case, the prices will rise to OP. Thus, E is the equilibrium at
which equilibrium price is OP and equilibrium quantity is OQ.
Equilibrium price for the industry is determined through the interaction of demand and supply is ` 2 per unit. The individual ‑rms
will accept ` 2 per unit as the price and sell different quantities at this price. Let us consider the case of firm ‘X’. Firm X’s
quantity sold, total revenue, average revenue and marginal revenue are as given in Table 4.
Equilibrium of the Industry:
An industry in economic terminology consists of a large number of independent rms. Each such unit
in the industry produces a homogeneous product so that there is competition amongst goods
produced by different units. When the total output of the industry is equal to the total demand, we
say that the industry is in equilibrium; the price then prevailing is equilibrium price. A rm is said to
be in equilibrium when it is maximising its profits and has no incentive to expand or contract
production. As stated above, under competitive conditions, the equilibrium price for a given
product is determined by the interaction of the forces of demand and supply for it as is shown in
the graph and table.
In diagram, OP is the equilibrium price and OQ is the equilibrium quantity which will be sold at that
price. The equilibrium price is the price at which both demand and supply are equal and therefore,
no buyer who wanted to buy at that price goes dissatisfied and none of the sellers is dissatisfied
that he could not sell his goods at that price. It may be noticed that if the price were to be fixed at
any other level, higher or lower, demand remaining the same, there would not be equilibrium in the
market. Likewise, if the quantities of goods were greater or smaller than the demand, there would
not be equilibrium in the market.
Equilibrium of the Firm:
The firm is said to be in equilibrium when it maximizes its profit. The output which gives
maximum profit to the firm is called equilibrium output. In the equilibrium state, the rm has no
incentive either to increase or decrease its output. Firms in a competitive market are price-
takers. This is because there are a large number of rms in the market who are producing identical
or homogeneous products. As such these firms cannot influence the price in their individual
capacities. They have to accept the price determined through the interaction of total demand and
total supply of the commodity which they produce.
Firm X’s price, average revenue and marginal revenue are equal to 2. Thus, we see that in perfectly
competitive market a price-taking firm’s average revenue, marginal revenue and price are equal. As a result,
when the rm sells an additional unit, its total revenue increases by an amount equal to its price. AR = MR =
Price.
This is illustrated in the following graph:
The firm’s demand curve under perfect competition The market price OP is fixed through the interaction of total demand
and total supply of the industry. Firms have to accept this price as given and as such they are price-takers rather than price-
makers. They cannot increase the price above OP individually because of the fear of losing its customers to other firms.
They do not try to sell the product below OP because they do not have any incentive for lowering it. They will try to sell as
much as they can at price OP.
As such, P-line acts as demand curve for the firm. Because it is a price taker, the demand curve D facing an individual
competitive firm is given by a horizontal line at the level of market price set by the industry. In other words, the demand
curve of each firm is perfectly (or infinitely) elastic. The firm can sell as much or as little output as it likes along the
horizontal price line. Since price is given, a competitive firm has to adjust its output to the market price so that it earns
maximum profit.
Conditions for equilibrium of a firm:
As discussed earlier, a rm, in order to attain equilibrium position, has to satisfy two conditions as below:
(Note that because competitive rms take price as fixed, this is a rule for setting output, not price).
(i) The marginal revenue should be equal to the marginal cost. i.e. MR = MC. If MR is greater than MC,
there is always an incentive for the rm to expand its production further and gain by selling additional units.
If MR is less than MC, the rm will have to reduce output since an additional unit adds more to cost than to
revenue. Prots are maximum only at the point where MR = MC. Because the demand curve facing a
competitive rm is horizontal, so that MR = P, the general rule for prot maximization can be simplified. A
perfectly competitive rm should choose its output so that marginal cost equals price.
(ii) The MC curve should cut MR curve from below. In other words, MC should have a positive slope. . In
other words, MC should have a positive slope. Short-Run Profit Maximization by a Competitive Firm We
shall begin with the short-run output decision and then move on to the long run. In the short run, a firm
operates with a fixed amount of capital and must choose the levels of its variable inputs so as to maximize
profit.
In figure 16, DD and SS are the industry demand and supply curves which intersect at E to set the market price as
OP. The firms of perfectly competitive industry adopt OP price as given and considers P-Line as demand (average
revenue) curve which is perfectly elastic at P. As all the units are priced at the same level, MR is a horizontal line
equal to AR line. Note that MC curve cuts MR curve at two places T and R respectively. But at T, the MC curve is
cutting MR curve from above. T is not the point of equilibrium as the second condition is not satisfied. The ‑rm
will bene‑t if it goes beyond T as the additional cost of producing an additional unit is falling. At R, the MC curve
is cutting MR curve from below. Hence, R is the point of equilibrium and OQ2 is the equilibrium level of output.
3.0.2 Short run supply curve of the rm in a competitive market One interesting thing about the MC curve of a firm
in a perfectly competitive industry is that it depicts the firm’s supply curve.
i. Super Normal Profit:
A firm will earn super normal profit in short run if its SAC is less than the AR at the point of equilibrium. Such a
firm has been depicted in Figure 10.5.
It shows firm’s equilibrium at point R where its output is
OQ1. At this point, both the equilibrium conditions are
satisfied, i.e. MR = MC and, the MC curve is positively
sloped at the point of intersection. The average cost of the
firm, as represented by the SAC curve, is OT (= SQ1) at
this output level. Based on it, profit can be estimated as —
Total revenue – Total cost
Given that total revenue is OPRQ1 and total cost is OTSQ1,
Profit = PTSR = OPRQ1 – OTSQ1
This is the profit which the firm earns over and above the
normal profit and, hence, termed as super normal profit. It
has been shown by the shaded area in the figure.
ii. Normal Profit:
Figure 10.6 depicts case of a firm which has been earning only a normal profit.
The figure shows equilibrium at point R where the output is OQ1. At this level of output,
AC is RQ1, as shown by its SAC curve. It is equal to the per unit revenue which is also
RQ1. It means that firm is making only normal profit which is a part of average cost. In this
case —
Total revenue = Total cost = OPRQ1
iii. Firm Incurring Losses:
A firm can incur loss in short run. Such a firm is represented in Figure 10.7.
This single seller deals in the products that have no close substitutes and has a direct demand,
supply, and prices of a product.
Therefore, in monopoly, there is no distinction between an one organization constitutes the whole
industry.
Equilibrium in Monopoly
The conditions for Equilibrium in Monopoly are the same as those under perfect competition. The marginal
cost (MC) is equal to the marginal revenue (MR) and the MC curve cuts the MR curve from below.
Demand and Revenue under Monopoly:
In monopoly, there is only one producer of a product, who influences the price of the product by
making Change m supply. The producer under monopoly is called monopolist. If the monopolist
wants to sell more, he/she can reduce the price of a product. On the other hand, if he/she is willing
to sell less, he/she can increase the price.
As we know, there is no difference between organization and industry under monopoly.
Accordingly, the demand curve of the organization constitutes the demand curve of the entire
industry. The demand curve of the monopolist is Average Revenue (AR), which slopes downward.
Figure-9 shows the AR curve of the monopolist:
In Figure-9, it can be seen that more quantity (OQ2)
can only be sold at lower price (OP2). Under
monopoly, the slope of AR curve is downward, which
implies that if the high prices are set by the
monopolist, the demand will fall. In addition, in
monopoly, AR curve and Marginal Revenue (MR)
curve are different from each other. However, both
of them slope downward.
The negative AR and MR curve depicts the following facts:
i. When MR is greater than AR, the AR rises
ii. When MR is equal to AR, then AR remains constant
iii. When MR is lesser than AR, then AR falls
Here, AR is the price of a product, As we know, AR falls under monopoly; thus, MR is less than
AR.
Figure-10 shows AR and MR curves In figure-10, MR curve is shown below the AR curve because AR falls.
Table-1 shows the numerical calculation of AR and MR under monopoly:
under monopoly:
In this diagram, the monopoly firm is in equilibrium at point K where SMC = MR. The short run marginal cost
(SMC) curve cuts MR from below. At point K both the equilibrium conditions are fulfilled. As a result, therefore,
OE is monopoly price and OB, the monopoly output. At the monopoly output OB, the average total cost OF = BN.
The profit per unit is FE. The short run monopoly profit is ETNF, It is represented by the area of shaded rectangle
in figure 16.3.
At the output smaller than OB (say at point P) MR > SMC. Therefore, increased output up to B adds more to total
receipts than to total costs. In case, the output is increased beyond OB, the MR < SMC. Hence, the increased
outputs beyond OB adds more to total cost than to total receipts. This causes profits to decrease. So the best
(b) Short Run Equilibrium With Normal Profit Under Monopoly:
There is a false impression regarding the powers of a monopolist. It is said that the monopolistic
entrepreneur always earns profits. The fact, however, is that there is no guarantee for the monopolist to
earn profit in the short run. If a monopolist firm produces a new commodity and attempts to change the
taste pattern of the consumers through advertising campaigns etc., then the firm may operate at normal
profit or even produce at a loss minimizing price in the short run (Covering variable cost only). The
normal profit short run equilibrium of the monopoly firm is explained, in brief, with the help of the
diagrams.
A monopolist also accepts short run losses provided the variable costs of the firm are fully covered.
The loss minimizing short run equilibrium analysis is presented graphically.
n this figure (16.5), the best short run
level of output is OB units which is given
by the point L where MC = MR. A
monopolist sells OB units of output at
price CB. The total revenue of the firm
is equal to OBCF. The total cost of
producing OB units is OBHE. The
monopoly firm suffers a net loss equal
to the area FCHE. If the firm ceases
production, it then has to bear to total
fixed cost equal to GKHE. The firm in
the short run prefers to operate and
reduces its losses to FCHE only. In the
long, if the loss continues, the firm shall
have to close down.
Long Run Equilibrium Under Monopoly:
The monopolist creates barriers of entry for the new firms into the industry. The entry into the
industry is blocked by having control over the raw materials needed for the production of goods or
he may hold full rights to the production of a certain good (patent) or the market of the good may be
limited. If new firms try to enter in the field, it lowers the price of the good to such on extent that it
becomes unprofitable for new firms to continue production etc.
When there is no threat of the entry of new firms into the industry, the monopoly firm makes long run
adjustments in the scale of plant. In case, the demand for the product is limited, the monopolist can
afford to produce output at sub optimum scale. If the market size is large and permits to expand
output, then the monopolist would build an optimum scale of plant and would produce goods at the
minimum cost per unit. However, the monopolist would not stay in the business, if he makes losses
in the long period. The long run equilibrium of a monopoly firm is now explained with the help of
the following diagram.
Diagram/Curve:
In the long run, all the factors of production including the size of the plant are variable. A monopoly firm will
maximize profit at that level of output for which long run marginal cost (MC) is equal to marginal revenue
(MR) and the LMC curve intersects the MR curve from below. In the figure (16.6), the monopoly firm is in
equilibrium at point E where LMC = MR and LMC cuts MR curve from below. QP is the equilibrium price and
OQ is the equilibrium output.
At OQ level of output, the cost per unit is QH (LAC), whereas the price per unit of the good is QP. HP
represents the per unit super normal profit. The total super normal profit is equal to KPHN. It may here be
noted that at the equilibrium output OQ, the plant is not being fully utilized. The long run average cost (LAC)
is not minimum at this level of output OQ. The firm will build an optimum scale of plant only if the demand for
the product increases.
Threat of Entry of New Firms:
If there is a threat of entry of new firms into the market, the monopolist adopts price reduction strategy. He
instead of charging QP price per unit, lowers the price to BR. Since the per unit price BR is equal to the cost per
unit at R, the monopoly firm is earning only normal profit in the long run. The reduction in price and so in profits
is adopted to prevent the entry of new firms in the market.
Summing up, if a monopoly firm is in a position to maintain its monopoly status, it can earn super normal profit
in the long period. However, if there is an effective threat of the entry of potential firms in, the industry, then the
firm can earn just normal profit by reducing the price. The reduction in price depends on how strong is the threat
of potential entry into the industry.
Monopolistic competition
Monopolistic competition is a market structure characterized by many firms selling products that
are similar but not identical, so firms compete on other factors besides price. Monopolistic
competition implies imperfect competition, because the market structure is between pure
monopoly and pure competition.
Monopolistic competition is the economic market model with many sellers selling similar, but not
identical, products. The demand curve of monopolistic competition is elastic because although the
firms are selling differentiated products, many are still close substitutes, so if one firm raises its
price too high, many of its customers will switch to products made by other firms. This elasticity of
demand is like pure competition where elasticity is perfect. Demand is not perfectly elastic because
a monopolistic competitor has fewer rivals than would be the case for perfect competition, and
because the products are differentiated to some degree, so they are not perfect substitutes.
Monopolistic competition has a downward sloping demand curve. Thus, just as for a pure
monopoly, its marginal revenue will always be less than the market price, because it can only
increase demand by lowering prices, but by doing so, it must lower the prices of all units of its
product. Hence, monopolistically competitive firms maximize profits or minimize losses by
producing that quantity where marginal revenue = marginal cost, both over the short run and the
long run.
Characteristics Monopolistic Competition:
Chamberlin’s theory of monopolistic competition has the following
characteristics:
1. Few firms:
2. Interdependence:
3. Non-Price Competition:
4. Barriers to Entry of Firms:
5. Role of Selling Costs:
6. Group Behaviour:
7. Nature of the Product:
8. Indeterminate Demand Curve:
1. Few firms:
Under oligopoly, there are few large firms. The exact number of firms is not defined. Each firm produces
a significant portion of the total output. There exists severe competition among different firms and each
firm try to manipulate both prices and volume of production to outsmart each other.
For example, the market for automobiles in India is an oligopolist structure as there are only few
producers of automobiles.
The number of the firms is so small that an action by any one firm is likely to affect the rival firms. So,
every firm keeps a close watch on the activities of rival firms.
2. Interdependence:
Firms under oligopoly are interdependent. Interdependence means that actions of one firm affect the
actions of other firms. A firm considers the action and reaction of the rival firms while determining its
price and output levels. A change in output or price by one firm evokes reaction from other firms
operating in the market.
For example, market for cars in India is dominated by few firms (Maruti, Tata, Hyundai, Ford, Honda,
etc.). A change by any one firm (say, Tata) in any of its vehicle (say, Indica) will induce other firms (say,
Maruti, Hyundai, etc.) to make changes in their respective vehicles.
3. Non-Price Competition:
Under oligopoly, firms are in a position to influence the prices. However, they try to avoid price competition for the
fear of price war. They follow the policy of price rigidity. Price rigidity refers to a situation in which price tends to
stay fixed irrespective of changes in demand and supply conditions. Firms use other methods like advertising, better
services to customers, etc. to compete with each other.
If a firm tries to reduce the price, the rivals will also react by reducing their prices. However, if it tries to raise the
price, other firms might not do so. It will lead to loss of customers for the firm, which intended to raise the price. So,
firms prefer non- price competition instead of price competition.