Professional Documents
Culture Documents
CSR Class 1 - JohBru Final
CSR Class 1 - JohBru Final
CLASS 1
Take a pen.
Take a sheet of paper.
Write down your name.
Answer.
(you have 5 minutes – no good/bad answer)
According to you…
■ Introduction
■ The role of business in society
■ Distinguishing various concepts of CSR
■ CSR & Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
Corporations have faced numerous scandals
linked to business ethics
Deepwater Horizon
(environmental Sub-prime mortgages
catastrophe) (global financial crisis)
Cross-selling
Bribery
2002-06: €1.3bn of
questionable payments
(fined $1.6bn)
2012 - Fined $3bn for bribing
doctors to increase sales
4
Some business people have become famous for their
(un)ethical behavior
5
The Issue: The Myth of Business as Amoral
adapted from de George 1999 and Ed Freeman speech at Epegon Foundation, 2009
Þ Given the opportunity, business people and individuals will cheat or cut
corners
Þ Business works because people are competitive and greedy
LEARNING GOALS
9
The module requirements (1/3)
• Active participation
- Critical thinking
Class • Preparation
Participation
1 - Readings
- Cases
(25%) • Responsible engagement
- Professionalism
10
The module requirements (2/3)
11
The module requirements (2/3)
12
Final assignment: group poster + report
http://www.supi.manchester.ac.uk/forteachers/academicposterg
uidance/
13
PROGRAM
■ Introduction
■ The role of business in society
■ Distinguishing various concepts of CSR
■ CSR & Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
WHAT IS THE PURPOSE OF THE FIRM?
22
Can a corporation have “social” responsibilities?
The narrow view…
Source: Birgit Kleymann, adapted from Joseph R. DesJardins, Business, Ethics, and the Environment:
(c)Imagining a Sustainable
2010 Dr. Birgit Kleymann Future. Pearson Education, 2007
Can a corporation have “social” responsibilities?
The narrow view…
* 28
30
Can a corporation have “social” responsibilities?
The Ford Pinto Case
• Because of strong competition Ford condensed the incubating time for car
from 3 ½ year down to 2 years.
• During crash testing Ford discovered that the Pinto’s fuel tank could rupture
during a rear-end impact. !But it respect legislation standards.
• To make changes: cost Ford $11 per vehicle, with 12.5 million vehicles
needing to be recalled thus the total cost = $137.5 million.
• 180 people could die, 180 people could suffer serious burns, and 2,100
vehicles could be destroyed by fire.
• figures from the US National Highway Traffic Safety Administration:
- cost of a life to society = $200,000
- serious burn, the cost estimate was $67,000
Þ total cost to society of not recalling the Pinto is $49.5 million
“…Ford allegedly was aware of the design flaw, refused to pay for a redesign, and
decided it would be cheaper to pay off possible lawsuits. The magazine obtained
a cost-benefit analysis that it said Ford had used to compare the cost of repairs
(Ford estimated the cost to be $11 per car) against the cost of settlements for
deaths, injuries, and vehicle burnouts. The document became known as the Ford
Pinto Memo”
A broader view on Corporate Social
Responsibility (CSR)
St gag
rfo e S
a k em
En
rm o c
CSR
eh
GLOBAL an ial
ol ent
ce
de
CITIZENSHIP Cor
r
ship
Int C itize n Acc pora
egr rate G oun te
Con ativ Cor
p o Res lob ta b
p a ility
tra e S
ct T oci ons l
heo al Creating Shared Value ibil
ry ity
te S o c ial
Corpora eness
e s po nsiv
R
Definition(s) of CSR: Complexity…
37
Definition(s) of CSR: Let’s agree on this (1-2/4)
The Essence
of CSR
Definition(s) of CSR: Let’s agree on this (3/4)
CSR is related to the company’s ability to manage and to satisfy CSR as a way to
the concerns of its different stakeholders (Clarkson, 1995) satisfy stakeholders
Stakeholder theory
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bIRUaLcvPe8
Definition(s) of CSR: Let’s agree on this (/4)
CSR is related to the company’s ability to manage and to satisfy CSR as a way to
the concerns of its different stakeholders (Clarkson, 1995) satisfy stakeholders
“the way in which a company manages and improves its social and
Social, ecological and environmental impact to generate value for both its shareholders
strategic innovation and its stakeholders by innovating its strategy, organisation and
operations” (CSR Europe)
BRIDGING THE GAP BETWEEN SHAREHOLDER
AND STAKEHOLDER THEORY
Pfarrer:
■ Both consider value creation but stakeholder theory looks at a
wider set of constituents
■ No “separation thesis” between ‘business’ and ‘responsibility’
■ Stakeholder theory as an extension of shareholder theory
■ Or, vice versa, shareholder theory as an early version of
stakeholder theory?
PROGRAM
■ Introduction
■ The role of business in society
■ Distinguishing various concepts of CSR
■ CSR & SDGs
Carbon footprint
https://footprint.wwf.org.uk/carbon/footprint
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5G0ndS3uRdo
Sustainable Development Goals
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5G0ndS3uRdo
SDGs & corporate strategy (Kiron et al, 2017)
Importance