Professional Documents
Culture Documents
ASUH Rolantine PPT M2 22
ASUH Rolantine PPT M2 22
ASUH Rolantine PPT M2 22
INTRODUCTION
2
INTRODUCTION
3
INTRODUCTION
However, the current set of commercial S. cerevisiae strains and its
derived hybrids is insufficient to provide novel properties to beer and
wine, stressing
The need for new and improved strains for the industry
(Aquilani et al., 2015; Alperstein et al., 2020; Gibson et al., 2020)
Palm wine
6
INTRODUCTION
Palm wine yeast
Applications of yeast
7
INTRODUCTION
Alcoholic beverage produced from the fermentation of
grape juice or pulp (Combina et al.,2005)
Wine
One of the fermented functional foods having health
benefits (Singh et al.,1998)
9
INTRODUCTION (1/11)
?
WHICH YEAST STRAIN
ISOLATED FROM RAPHIA
PALM WINE HAS
POTENTIAL APPLICATIONS
FOR WINE FERMENTATION
10
INTRODUCTION (11/11)
General objective
To isolate and test yeast strains from raphia palm wine for their
potential in fruit wine production via fermentation
Specific objectives
01. Characterize the microbiological profile of raffia palm wine
harvested in Ngaoundere
H1. The Ngaoundere raphia palm wine harbours microorganisms of
industrial interest, especially yeasts
02. Carryout a test fermentation of guava nectar in the production of
guava wine; with the hypothesis that
H2. The isolated yeasts could ferment guava nectar and produce wine
with acceptable aroma profile. 11
MATERIALS AND METHODS
12
INTRODUCTION
Palm
Guava wine
Physicochemical analysis of
raffia palm wine
Production of guava must Microbial load analysis of
raphia palm wine
Characterization of guava
Isolation and Purification of
must
of the isolated yeast
Prelimenary identification of
Pre-fermentation treatments yeast
Multiplication and Preparation
of innoculum
Fermentation of guava
must
Characterization of guava
Figure 1: Synoptic wine
diagram of work Sensory analysis 13
MATERIAL AND METHODS
MATERIALS
16
MATERIAL AND METHODS
Isolation and Purification of yeast from raphia palm wine
Distilled sterile
water
10ml of
raffia Centrifugation
palm 3000rmp/4mins sediment Resuspension 1
wine
Supernatant
SDA SDA
Supernatant
18
MATERIAL AND METHODS
METHODS
Production and fermentation of Guava Must
water water
Pasteurisation
3 Guava wine
(65OC ; 30mins)
Phenolic compounds
Appearance 2
Colour 2
Aroma and boquet 4
Acescent 2
Total acid 2
Sugar 1
Body 1
Flavour 2
Astringency 2
General quality 2
21
Total
RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS
22
RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS
Table 1: Physicochemical analysis of raphia palm wine
Time (hour)
Parameter 0 24 48
pH 6.37 4.25 3.5
TSS (°B) 13.34 11.57 10.11
Alcohol content (%)
7.9 15.8 18.4
23
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Table 2: microbial profile of microorganism found in raphia palm
wine
Microorganism Microbial load/cmf
Aerobic mesophilic 6 X
bacteria
yeast 15 X
Lactic acid
Aerobic
Lactic mesophilic
bacteria bacteria 18 X
bacteria
Coliform Presence
E. coli Absent
Mould Present Yeast
Mould
Coliform 24
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Table 3: Morphological characteristics of the isolated yeast
25
Table 4: Microscopic characteristic of the isolates
ISOLATES FORM Gram test Form Buddin Viability
g
SFCT Oval positive In clusters and in chains +++ viable
SWEC Oval positive In clusters ++ viable
26
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Table 5: Representation of stress exclusive test results
Temperature
Isolates Ethanol tolerance Tolerance Flocculation
0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25°C 37°C Tolerance
LTYC + ++ + - - ++ ++ -
YWCC ++ ++ ++ - - + + -
YCMC ++ + ++ - - ++ ++ +
SLWC +++ +++ +++ - - + - +
SWEC +++ ++ +++ - - ++ + +
SCTC +++ ++ +++ - - -
SFCT ++++ ++ ++++ - - +++ + +
Key: + = less ++= moderate; +++= intensive; ++++ = more intensive - =
negative ++++ +++
SYCC ++++ - - +++ + ++ 27
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Parameters Content
Total soluble solids (°Brix) 10.20 ± 0.30
Moisture content (%) 86.03 ± 0.58
pH 4.30 ± 0.00
Titratable acidity(g citric acid/100g 0.75 ± 0.11
fresh mass)
Reducing sugar (mg/ml) 1.18 ± 0.01
Total phenolic compounds(mg/100g) 4 .38 ± 0.008
28
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
4.00
3.50
3.00
2.50
2.00
pH
1.50
1.00
0.50
0.00
C C C T A C J
M Y EC FC
YC
T LW
S S SW S
29
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
0.45
0.40
Total polyphenol (mg/100g)
0.35
0.30
18.00
0.25
16.00
0.20
0.15 14.00
0.05 10.00
0.00 8.00
C C C T A C J
M TY EC FC
6.00
YC LW
S S SW S
4.00
Wine samples 2.00
0.00
T J
Figure 5: Total Polyphenol M
C
T Y C
LW
C EC FC A C
YC S S SW S
content of the different wine
Wine samples from different yeast
samples
Figure 6: Alcohol content of
the different wine samples 30
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Appearance
5
Astringency Aroma
Flavour Acescent
Body Acidity
Eight yeast strains were isolated and purified, then screened based on
their ethanol, temperature and flocculation tolerances. Five of the
eight strains were selected for further testing as a ferment. (not q
cncusion: on whqt bases were the 5 selected)
32
Conclusion and perspectives
The yeast strain SLWC produced more alcohol than all the other yeasts
and wines from strains SWEC and STYC were most appreciated
.
PERSPECTIVES
34