Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Incident Report
Incident Report
Investigation/
Root Cause Analysis
Incident Reporting and Investigation / Root Cause Analysis
Agenda
1. All incidents shall be entered into the JLL incident management system within 24 hours
2. Incidents shall be investigated within 5 days and root cause(s) identified
3. Lessons learned shall be completed within 10 days
4. Days away or restricted duty days shall be updated when the employee returns to work
5. Corrective actions shall be tracked to closure in the JLL incident management system
6. Affected employees shall be trained on how to report accidents
7. Those completing incident investigations shall have appropriate experience or training
8. Enforcement authority correspondence shall be uploaded to the incident management system
9. Outcomes and metrics shall be reported to responsible leadership
Spill or Release to the Environment of oil or other hazardous materials of a quantity that
requires immediate reporting to a Government Agency
NOTE: Conduct an RCA any time a negative event occurs, and your Team needs to understand how it happened.
Cause & Effect/Fishbone diagram: Use a structured brainstorming session with a team to
develop the possible causes
Look for causes or themes that appear repeatedly
Single-Track
No fuel getting to Car is out of fuel Defective float on the Defective float on Replace (warranty repair)
engine fuel gauge the fuel gauge defective float
Multiple-Track
Problem: Scaffolding Collapsed
Gust of wind Scaffold was not It was considered scaffold They would have to drill into façade The design drawings Lack of understanding Training of JLL supplier
blew scaffold mechanically tied off anchors could damage and so width of scaffold base was were not verified by a and verification of CDM Project Manager and JLL
over to a listed building newly refurbished building increased by scaffold company, competent person and roles and Facility manager on CDM
façade although this design modification was shared with the responsibilities regulations. Put a system in
clearly inappropriate principal designer or place to review JLL contractors
client (including principal designer)
training on CDM
An incomplete risk Modification to scaffold design done This change was not Lack of communication Enhance communication
assessment was developed as per verbal instruction between communicated to the and lack of inspection through site orientation /
but not reviewed as part of principal contractor site supervisor & principal designer nor program induction, cross party
management of change their subcontractor scaffolder only identified through spot meetings and introduction of
process checks through client spot check process by client.
(JLL)
Principal contractor supervisor Overstepped Delegation of authority Clear lines of communication
instructed changes to the scaffold boundaries of authority not clearly defined and and defined DOA established
(Contrary to his specialist suppliers checked between all parties at
design). commencement of project
Lack of client Lack of supervision and Enhanced management of
supervision of Principal vendor performance contractors and contractor
contractor management selection
Local permissions to gain Lack of detailed planning by ??? and Poor planning and Lack of planning Improved pre-construction
consent for façade drilling Principal contractor, principal communication safety planning
would take weeks and were designer (it was known that a
not considered early scaffold was needed and that the
enough in project building was listed)