l1 Arar Asr Intro and Overview

You might also like

Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 38

INTRODUCTION AND

OVERVIEW
DIAGNOSIS & CLASSIFICATION
Coexisting Cardiovascular Risk Factors
for Risk Stratification

• Diabetes Mellitus
• Dyslipidaemia (TC > 6.5mmol/L)
• Smoking status
• Microalbuminuria
• Estimated GFR < 60mL/min/m2 (CKD)
• Family history of premature CV disease
(Male < 55 y/o; Female < 65 y/o)
TARGET ORGAN DAMAGE & COMPLICATIONS
Risk Stratification
Algorithm for the
Management of
Hypertension
CHOICE OF FIRST LINE MONOTHERAPY

Choose monotherapy in patients with


stage 1 hypertension and with no
compelling indications from one of the 5
classes of drugs ( ACEIs, ARBs, Beta
Blockers , CCBs or Diuretics ) based on
patients' individual clinical profile
Antihypertensive agents
Antihypertensive agents
Blood Pressure Targets
CATEGORY BLOOD
PRESSURE
TARGETS
For all < 140/90 mmHg

Diabetic < 140/80 mmHg

High/ very High Risk diabetic, < 130/80 mmHg


Lacunar stroke,
LVH, CKD with Proteinuria > 1g/

day
Choice of Anti- Hypertensive Drugs in
Patients with Concomitant Conditions
Effective Combination Therapy
Effective Combination Therapy Used in
Outcome Trials
RESISTANT HYPERTENSION
If BP is still >140/90 mmHg with combination of 3 drugs (including a diuretic at near
maximal doses) it is by definition Resistant Hypertension

Before labeling a patient as having resistant hypertension exclude


● Inappropriately measured BP

● Non- adherence to medication

● Office Resistant hypertension

● Inappropriate combination and doses of drugs prescribed

● Intake of any substances which may antagonise the hypertensive effects of drugs taken ( eg NSAIDS,
sympathomimetics, liquorice, oral contraceptives, corticosteroids )
RESISTANT HYPERTENSION

Once Resistant Hypertension has been established

● exclude secondary hypertension ( Commonest OSA )


● re emphasise on non pharmacological approaches
● add spironolactone as the 4th drug ( provided renal function is
intact )
● add a 5th drug if is still not controlled on 4 drugs
( Choice of 5th drug include a beta blocker, an alpha

blocker or a centrally acting drug )


REFRACTORY HYPERTENSION

Patients whose BP are not controlled after taking > 5 anti


hypertensives are by definition having

Refractory Hypertension

Both resistant and refractory


hypertensives , are candidates for device-
based intervention
* Hypertensive urgency - If patient has vague symptoms,
grade III / IV retinopathy and proteinuria

* Asymptomatic severe hypertension - If patient has no


symptoms, no TOD (proteinuria, retinopathy): can treat as
outpatient, start combination treatment, TCA one week
Management of Hypertensive Urgency
( Severe hypertension with non-specific symptoms )
Management of Hypertensive Emergency
( Severe hypertension with acute target organ damage )
KEY LEARNING POINTS

2. In 2015, prevalence of HPT in Malaysia


was 44.7% among those > 30 years years

3. HPT is a silent disease , 62.5% of the cases


remained undiagnosed. Therefore BP should be
measured at every chance encounter

5. A SBP of 130-139mmHg and/or DBP of 85-89


mmHg is defined as ' At Risk BP' an should be treated
in certain risk groups
KEY LEARNING POINTS
6. Healthy Living should be recommended for
all individuals with HPT and At Risk BP

8. In patients with newly diagnosed


uncomplicated HPT who have no compelling
indications, choice of first line monotherapy
include ACEIs, ARBs, BBs, CCBs and
Diuretics
9. Only 37.4% of treated patients achieve
target BP

in Stage 2 and some risk category in Stage 1


THE ROLE OF
CHRONIC CARE MODEL
IN HYPERTENSION MANAGEMENT
THE CHRONIC CARE MODEL

6 1
4 2 3 5

24
1. ORGANISATION OF HEALTH CARE
A system seeking to improve
chronic disease care must be
motivated and prepared for
change throughout the
organization from the micro,
meso and macro levels

Create policies and allocate resources with a clear focus to


improve delivery of care for patients with hypertension
2. DELIVERY SYSTEM DESIGN
Utilising multidisciplinary
healthcare team to transform
a system that is essentially
reactive (responding mainly
when a person is sick) to one
that is proactive and focused
on keeping a person as
healthy as possible

Multi-disciplinary practice team with


clear division of labour - planned
management and follow-up
3. DECISION SUPPORT

Promote clinical care that


is consistent with up-to-
date scientific evidence and
patient preferences

Translate evidence based clinical practice guideline


recommendation into daily clinical practice
4. SELF-MANAGEMENT SUPPORT
Emphasize on the patients’
central role as active
partners in managing their
health through
empowerment and
motivation

Empower patients with knowledge and skills to enhance confidence to


self-care. Build quality relationship through effective communication.
5. CLINICAL INFORMATION
SYSTEM
Organize patients and
population data to facilitate
efficient and effective chronic
disease care

Computerized system to remind &


prompt actions; support shared care
among multiple professionals, provide
feedback to healthcare personnel, track
progress and defaulters
6. COMMUNITY RESOURCES

Mobilize community
resources to meet the needs
of patients

Patients & care providers need linkages with community


resources such as home care, exercise program and support
groups.
Decision Support Tool Clinical Informed,
Information Empowered
System Patient

Prepared &
Proactive Productive Interactions
Doctor and
NCD Team

Self-
Management
Support Tool

31
EVIDENCE SUPPORTING THE
CHRONIC CARE MODEL
● CCM has been shown to improve quality of
care and outcomes for various chronic
conditions including hypertension
● Of the 77 papers which met the inclusion
criteria, 75 papers reported improvements to
healthcare practice or health outcomes for
people living with chronic disease.
● The most commonly used elements of the
CCM were self-management support and
delivery system design.

32
CHRONIC CARE MODEL IN
MALAYSIA

33
A cross-sectional survey to assess the feasibility to implement the components of Chronic
Care Model (CCM) in the public primary care clinics
 Majority of the clinics were already equipped with core resources to implement the CCM

 Majority of the clinics have adequate multidisciplinary staff who were willing to be trained
and were committed to improve patient care

 Therefore, implementation of the essential components of the CCM was feasible, despite
various constraints
34
CHRONIC CARE MODEL IN
MALAYSIA

35
CHRONIC CARE MODEL IN
MALAYSIA

36
KEY PRACTICE POINTS
1. Produce a prepared, proactive health care
team to manage chronic conditions

2. Create effective clinical information


systems e.g. disease registry,
comprehensive medical records

3. Translate CPG recommendations into daily


clinical practice

4. Empower patients to self-manage their


conditions

5. Perform continuous quality improvement activities


e.g. Clinical Audit
THANK YOU

You might also like