Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Corporate Reporting II Lecture 4 Vertical Groups
Corporate Reporting II Lecture 4 Vertical Groups
Reporting II
Lecture 4
Complex Groups-Vertical groups
Complex groups
Complex group structure exist where a subsidiary
of a parent owns shareholding in another company
which makes that entity also a subsidiary of the
parent entity.
Complex groups can be classified under two
headings;
Vertical group
Mixed group (D-shaped)
Vertical groups
A vertical group exists where the subsidiary of a
parent entity holds shares in a further entity such
that control is achieved.
The parent entity therefore controls the subsidiary
entity, and in turn, its subsidiary (often referred to
as sub-subsidiary entity)
Vertical groups
Examples;
1. H has 90% shares in S who in turn also has 80%
shares in T
2. H has 70% shares in S who in turn also has 60%
shares in T
Vertical groups
In both situations H controls S, and S controls T.
H is therefore able to exert control over T by virtue
of its ability to control S.
All three companies form a group.
The basic techniques of consolidation is same as in
simple groups with some changes to goodwill,
NCI and group reserve calculations
Approach to question
When establishing the group structure, follow
these steps;
Control - Which entities does the parent control
directly or indirectly?
Percentages – What are the effective ownership
percentages for consolidation?
Dates – When did the parent achieve control over
the subsidiary and the sub-subsidiary?
Illustration 1
H purchased 90% shares of S on 31/12/2000
S purchased 80% shares of T on 31/12/2000
Control:
H controls S and S controls T. Therefore H can
indirectly control T.
Illustration 1
Effective consolidation percentage:
S will be consolidated with H owning 90% and the
NCI owning 10%.
T will be consolidated with H owning 72% (90% *
80%) and the NCI owning 28% (100%-72%)
These effective ownership percentages will be
used in standard workings (W4) and (W5)
Illustration 1
Dates
S will be consolidated from 31 December 2000.
When H acquires control of S, it also acquires
indirect control over T. Therefore H will
consolidate T from 31 December 2000.
Illustration 2
H purchased 70% shares of S on 31/12/2001
S purchased 60% shares of T on 30/04/2002
Control
H controls S and S controls T. Therefore, H can
indirectly control T.
Illustration 2
Effective consolidation percentage:
S will be consolidated with H owning 70% and the NCI
owning 30%.
T will be consolidated with H owning 42% (70% * 60%)
and the NCI owning 58% (100%-42%)
These effective ownership percentages will be used in
standard workings (W4) and (W5)
Do not be put off by the fact that the effective group
interest in T is less than 50%, and that the effective non-
controlling interest is more than 50%
Illustration 2
Dates
S will be consolidated from 31 December 2001.
However, S did not gain control of T until 30 April
2002 meaning that H does not indirectly control T
until this date. Therefore T is consolidated into the
H group from 30 April 2002.
Indirect holding adjustment
Accounting for sub-subsidiary requires an indirect
holding adjustment.
Goodwill in the sub-subsidiary is calculated from
the perspective of ultimate holding company.
Therefore the cost of the investment in the sub-
subsidiary should be the parent’s share of the
amount paid by its subsidiary.
The NCI’s share of the cost of the investment in the
sub-subsidiary must be eliminated from the goodwill
calculation.
Indirect holding adjustment
The value of the non-controlling interest in the
subsidiary includes the NCI’s share of the cost of
the investment in the sub-subsidiary.
The NCI’s share of the cost of the investment in the
sub-subsidiary must be eliminated from the NCI
calculation.
Illustration 3
On 31 December 2001, A purchased 90% of the equity
shares in B for $150,000 and B purchased 80% of the equity
shares in C $100,000.
At this date, the fair value of the net assets of B and C were
$144,000 and $90,000 respectively. The fair value of non-
controlling interest in B and C were $17,000 and $15,000
respectively.
Required;
Calculate goodwill and non-controlling interest for inclusion
in the consolidated statement of financial position as at 31
December 2001.
Solution
A– 90% - B – 80% - C
Goodwill
B ($) C ($)
Consideration 150,000 100,000
Indirect holding - (10,000)
adjustment
Add: FV of NCI @ 17,000 15,000
acqn
167,000 195,000
Less: NA @ acqn (144,000) (90,000)
Goodwill @ acqn 23,000 15,000
Non-controlling interest
B: NCI @ acqn (W3) 17,000
B: Indirect holding adj’ment (W3) (10,000)
C: NCI @ acqn (W3) 15,000
NCI 22,000
Note: In subsequent years, the NCI will be adjusted
for its share of the post-acquisition net assets
movement of each subsidiary.
The NCI% in B is 10% (100%-90%)
The NCI% in C is 28% (100%-(90%*80%))
Illustration 4
The draft statement of financial position for David
Colin and John, as at 31 December 2004 are as
follows; $’000
D C J
Net assets 280 180 130
Shares in subsidiary 120 80 -
400 260 130
Illustration 4
D C J
Equity capital ($1) 200 100 50
Retained earnings 100 60 30
Liabilities 100 100 50
Total 400 260 130
Illustration 4
The following information is also available;
1. David acquired 75,000 $1 shares in Colin on 1
January 2004 when the retained earnings of Colin
amounted to 40,000. At that date the FV of NCI of
Colin amounted to $38,000.
2. Colin acquired 40,000 $1 shares in John on 30 June
2004 when the retained earnings of John amounted to
$25,000. The retained earnings of John had been
$20,000 on the date of David’s acquisition of Colin.
Illustration 4
On 30 June 2004, the FV of the NCI in John (both
direct and indirect), based upon effective
shareholding was $31,000.
Goodwill has suffered no impairment. It is the
group policy to use full goodwill method.
Required;
Produce the CSFP of David group as at 31
December 2004.
Solution – Illustration 4
Statement of Financial Position for the David
group at 31 December 2004.
$’000
Goodwill ($18+$16) W3 34
Sundry assets ($280+$180+$130) 590
624
Solution – Illustration 4
Equity and liabilities; $’000
Equity capital 200
Retained earnings (W5) 118
318
NCI (W4) 56
Total equity 374
Total liabilities 250
Total 624
Solution – Illustration 4
Group structure;
David – 75% - Colin 1/1/2004
Colin – 80% - John 30/6/2004
Solution – Illustration 4
Control:
Davidcontrols Colin and Colin controls John.
Therefore indirectly David can control John.
Solution – Illustration 4
Effective Consolidation Percentage:
Colin will be consolidated with David owning
75% and NCI owning 25%.
John will be consolidated with David owning 60%
(80% * 75%) and NCI owning 40% (100%-60%)
The effective ownership percentage will be used in
standard workings W4 and W5.
Solution – Illustration 4
Dates:
Colin will be consolidated from 1 January 2004.
However, Colin did not gain control of John until
30 June 2004. Therefore David does not indirectly
control John until this date. As such John is
consolidated on 30 June 2004.
Solution – Illustration 4
W2; Net Assets
The acquisition date will be the date when David
(the parent company) gained control over each
entity.
Colin – 1 January 2004
John – 30 June 2004
This means that the information given regarding
John’s retained earnings at 1 January 2004 is
irrelevant in this context.
Solution – Illustration 4
Net Assets of Subsidiaries; Colin
At Acqn At Y/E
Equity capital 100 100
Retained earnings 40 60
140 160
Net Assets of Subsidiaries; John
At Acqn At Y/E
Equity capital 50 50
Retained earnings 25 30
75 80
Solution – Illustration 4
W3: Goodwill
A separate goodwill calculation is required for
each subsidiary.
For the sub-subsidiary, goodwill is calculated from
the perspective of the ultimate parent entity
(David) rather than the immediate parent (Colin).
Therefore the effective cost of John is only
David’s share of the amount that Colin paid for
John, $80,000 * 75% = $60,000.
Solution – Illustration 4
W3: Goodwill ($’000)
Colin John
Cost of investment in sub 120 80
Ind holding adj (25%*80) - (20)
FV of NCI 38 31
158 91
Less:
Net Assets @ acqn (140) (75)
Goodwill 18 16
Solution – Illustration 4
W4 – Non Controlling Interest (NCI)
$’000
Colin - NCI at acquisition (W3) 38
Colin – NCI share of post acqn
net assets (25% * 20,000)W2 5
Less: Ind. Holding Adj. (25%*80,000) (20)
John – NCI at acquisition (W3) 31
John - NCI share of post acqn
net assets (40% * 5,000)W2 2
NCI 56
Solution – Illustration 4
W5 – Group Retained Earnings
$’000
David 100
Colin - 75%*20,000 (W2) 15
John - 60% * 5,000 (W2) 3
Total 118
Note that only the group’s effective share (60%) is
taken of John’s post acquisition retained earnings.
Illustration 5 – Vertical group
The draft statement of financial position for
Daniel, Craig and James, as at 31 December 2004
are as follows; $’000
D C J
Net assets 180 80 80
Shares in subsidiary 120 80 -
300 160 80
Illustration 5 – Vertical group
D C J
Equity capital ($1) 200 100 50
Retained earnings 100 60 30
Total 300 160 80
Illustration 5 – Vertical group
The following information is also available;
1. Craig acquired 40,000 $1 shares in James on 1
January 2004 when the retained earnings of James
amounted to 25,000.
2. Daniel acquired 75,000 $1 shares in Craig on 30
June 2004 when the retained earnings of Craig
amounted to $40,000 and those of James
amounted to $30,000.
Illustration 5 – Vertical group
Itis the group policy to value NCI using the
proportion of net assets method.
Required;
Produce the CSFP of Daniel group as at 31
December 2004.
Illustration 5 – Solution
Statement of Financial Position for the Daniel
group at 31 December 2004.
$’000
Goodwill ($15+$12) W3 27
Sundry assets ($180+$80+$80) 340
367
Illustration 5 – Solution
Equity and liabilities; $’000
Equity capital 200
Retained earnings (W5) 115
NCI (W4) 52
Total equity 374
Illustration 5 – Solution
Group structure;
Daniel – 75% - Colin 30/6/2004
Craig – 80% - John 1/1/2004
Illustration 5 – Solution
Control:
Daniel controls Craig and Craig controls James.
Therefore indirectly Daniel can control James.
Illustration 5 – Solution
Effective Consolidation Percentage:
Craig will be consolidated with Daniel owning 75%
and NCI owning 25%.
James will be consolidated with Daniel owning 60%
(80% * 75%) and NCI owning 40% (100%-60%)
The effective ownership percentage will be used in
standard workings W4 and W5. they will also be
used in W3 to calculate goodwill as the group’s
policy is to use the proportion of net assets method.
Illustration 5 – Solution
Dates:
Craig will be consolidated from 30 June 2004.
When Daniel acquires control over Craig, it also
acquires indirect control over James.
Therefore Daniel will consolidate James on 30
June 2004.
Illustration 5 – Solution
Net Assets of Subsidiaries; Craig
At Acqn At Y/E
Equity capital 100 100
Retained earnings 40 60
140 160
Net Assets of Subsidiaries; James
At Acqn At Y/E
Equity capital 50 50
Retained earnings 30 30
80 80
Illustration 5 – Solution
W3: Goodwill ($’000)
Craig James
Cost of investment in sub 120 80
Ind holding adj (25%*80) - (20)
FV of NCI 35 32
Craig 25%*140,000 W2
James 40%*80,000 W2
155 92
Less: Net Assets @ acqn (140) (80)
Goodwill 15 12
Illustration 5 – Solution
W4 – Non Controlling Interest (NCI)
$’000
Craig - NCI at acquisition (W3) 35
Craig – NCI share of post acqn
net assets (25% * 160-140)W2 5
Less: Ind. Holding Adj. W3 (20)
James – NCI at acquisition (W3) 32
James - NCI share of post acqn
net assets (40% * 80-80)W2 -
NCI 52
Illustration 5 – Solution
W5 – Group Retained Earnings
$’000
Daniel 100
Craig - 75%*60-40 (W2) 15
James - 60% * 30-30 (W2) -
Total 115
Exercise 1
The following are the statement of financial
position at 31 December 2017 for H group
companies. $’000
H S T
75% of shares in S 65 - -
60% of shares in T - 55 -
Sundry assets 280 133 100
345 188 100
Exercise 1 contd
H S T
Equity capital ($1) 100 60 50
Retained earnings 45 28 25
Liabilities 200 100 25
Total 345 188 100
Exercise 1contd.
All the shareholdings were acquired on 1 January
2011 when the retained earnings of S were
$10,000 and those of T were $8,000. At that date
the fair value of the NCI in S was $20,000. The
fair value of the total NCI (direct and indirect) in T
was $50,000.
It is the group’s policy to value the NCI using the
full goodwill method.
Exercise 1contd.
At the reporting date, the recoverable amount of
the net assets of S were $93,000. It was deemed
that goodwill arising on the acquisition of T was
not impaired.
Required;
Prepare the CSFP of H group as at 31 December
2017.
Exercise 2.
The statement of financial position of three entities
at 30 June 2016 were as follows. $’000
G V W
Investment 110 60 -
Sundry assets 350 200 120
460 260 120
Exercise 2 contd
G V W
Equity capital ($1) 100 50 10
Retained earnings 210 110 70
Liabilities 150 100 40
Total 450 260 120
Exercise 2 contd
1. G purchased 40,000 of the 50,000 $1 shares of
V on 1 July 2015 when the retained earnings of
that entity were $80,000. At that time, V held
7,500 of the 10,000 shares in W. These had been
purchased on 1 January 2015 when W’s retained
earnings were $65,000. On 1 July 2015 W’s
retained earnings were $67,000.
Exercise 2 contd
2. At 1 July 2015, the fair value of the NCI in V was
$27,000, and that of W (both direct and indirect) was
$31,500. It is the group policy to value NCI using the
full goodwill method.
3. The equity share capital of G includes $20,000
received from the issue of 20,000 shares class B
shares on 30 June 2016. These shares entitle the
holders to fixed annual dividends. The holders of
these B shares can also demand the repayment of their
capital from 30 June 2019.
Exercise 2 contd
4.Included in the liabilities of G $100,000
proceeds from the issue of a loan on 1 July 2015.
There are no annual payments and G therefore
believes that no further accounting entries are
required until the repayment date. The loan is
repayable on 30 June 2018 at a premium of 100%.
The effective interest on the loan is 26%
Exercise 2 contd
Required;
Prepare the CSFP for the G group as at 30 June
2016.