(1): Syadza Salsabyla Tamam THE PREDECESSORS MPWK UGM 2023 INTRO Modernization Theories (last week) Structural Theories view poverty in argue that poor countries got the poor countries as the result from poverty from their late response to exploitative economic structure, the modernization where powerful countries exploit the weaker ones, with the help of ‘free trades’ FEW POINTS ABOUT STRUCTURAL THEORY The Approach: Karl Marx “Base” and “Superstructure” Societies’ • which are influencing each other Material 1. The Base Environment material aspects; e.g. Production and distribution system of natural resources Community Material Societal Organization Rewards Changes 2. The Superstructure non-material aspects; e.g. Social, politics, • More influential to the communities’ and cultural system behavior than psychological and values This structural theory leads to Dependency Theories which disprove Marx’s capitalism theory 1. RAUL PREBISCH: IMPORT SUBSTITUTION INDUSTRIALIZATION Liberal economist, former Executive Secretary of ECLA (Economic Commission for Latin America) -- from 1950 to 1963 Main Question https://www.cepal.org/en/staff/raul- prebisch Why would industrial countries become wealthy while the agricultural ones are still poor? As the International Division of Labor Theory was not relevant anymore and resulting to the growing poverties of agricultural countries The industrial or ‘core’ countries got more wealthy from their exported goods while the agricultural or ‘periphery’ countries got trade deficit http://sociology-article.blogspot.com/2014/08/world- system-approach-dependency-theory.html 1. RAUL PREBISCH: IMPORT SUBSTITUTION INDUSTRIALIZATION A. Trade Deficit B. Protection of agricultural products in higher cost on import than revenue from export industrial countries – so the agricultural countries hard to export their products C. The needs for raw agriculture material are going down – from the development of technologies Prebisch–Singer hypothesis argues that the price of primary commodities declines relative to the price of manufactured goods over the long term Underdeveloped countries need to get industrialized, start from the imported goods; Engel’s Law https://ourworldindata.org/images/published/Engelsl-Law-Schematic_1350.webp so called the import substitution 2. THE DEBATE OF IMPERIALISM AND COLONIALISM ? Why did European carry out expansion and dominate other nations, politically and economically? God Glory Gold • The main motivation • Not religiously or • For the sake of was to spread their economically, but thirst economic profits. religion to people who for power and greatness; • John A. Hobson: to seek did not understand the irrationally more profitable markets concept of God • The urge to fight and and investments prove one's might; • V.I. Lenin: Imperialism instinctiveness is the highest • Joseph A. Schumpeter: development of without objects capitalism 3. PAUL BARAN: THE DEATHLY TOUCH AND CRETINISM • Developed-capitalist countries’ touch to the underdeveloped ones could hinder its development progress and will continue to be left behind • Capitalism in periphery countries are just like the cretinism https://www.invent.org/inductees/paul- disease: causing dwarfism and prevent the body to grow bigger baran
• Surplus income in third-world countries are taken by non-local
people or foreign economic power • Case : the growing-on-its-own Japan vs British-imperialized India • Feudal system in underdeveloped countries are influenced by landowner class; which would build connection with foreign trader and generate losses to local industries CLOSING (FROM THE WRITER) Marx viewed the pre-capitalism in underdeveloped countries as a Sleeping Beauty, waiting for the Prince to wake her up with a kiss. But this Prince is the industrial-capitalist countries, and the kiss is the imperialism. After getting the kiss, Sleeping Beauty will surely wake up. But Marx did not expect that her life will get unhealthy because the kiss was poisonous. THANK YOU :)