Professional Documents
Culture Documents
LAW 1 Art 5 17
LAW 1 Art 5 17
RULES AND
REGULATIONS
WHEN INVALID
The Labor Code may apply even if the parties are not
employers and employees of each other.
EMANCIPATION OF TENANTS
What law governs agrarian reform?
SHARECROPPING
Being a valid part of the labor force, tenant-farmers on private agricultural lands
primarily devoted to rice and corn under a system of share crop or lease tenancy whether
classified as landed estate or not shall be deemed owner of a portion constituting a
family-size farm of five (5) hectares if not irrigated and three (3) hectares if irrigated.
In all cases, the landowners may retain an area of not more than seven (7) DAR ADMINISTRATIVE
hectares if such landowner is cultivating such area or will now cultivate it.
ORDER NO. 02-06
Agricultural Leasehold Contract — A tenurial arrangement, whether
written or oral, express or implied, between the lessor-landholder and
lessee-farmer where the former consents to the latter's personal
cultivation of piece of agricultural land in consideration of a fixed rental
either in money or produce or both.
Agricultural Lessee — A person who, by himself and with the aid
available from within his immediate farm household, cultivates the land,
belonging to or possessed by another, with the latter's consent for
purposes of production, for a price certain in money or in produce or
both. It is distinguished from civil lessee as understood in the Civil Code
of the Philippines. (R.A. No. 3844, Section 166 (2)).
ARTICLE 8. TRANSFER OF LANDS TO TENANT-FARMERS
Being a valid part of the labor force, tenant-farmers on private agricultural lands
primarily devoted to rice and corn under a system of share crop or lease tenancy whether
classified as landed estate or not shall be deemed owner of a portion constituting a
family-size farm of five (5) hectares if not irrigated and three (3) hectares if irrigated.
In all cases, the landowners may retain an area of not more than seven (7)
hectares if such landowner is cultivating such area or will now cultivate it.
UNEMPLOYMENT RATE
- Percentage of unemployed individuals in an economy among individuals
currently in the labor force
UNDEREMPLOYMENT
- When a person does not work full time or takes a job that does not reflect
their actual training and financial needs (visible vs. invisible)
UNDEREMPLOYMENT RATE
- Percentage of the total number of underemployed persons to the total
number of employed persons
RECRUITMENT AND
PLACEMENT OF WORKERS
ARTICLE 13. DEFINITIONS
CASE EXAMPLE
CASH BOND
- A cash bond is when you post cash in order to fulfill your
obligations. The advantage to the principal of a cash bond is a lower
fee. Because reserves are essentially covered by the cash on hand,
there is no need for funds to be readily available. The disadvantage is
having to have the full bond amount in cash on hand.
SURETY BOND
- A surety bond is a three-party agreement between you (the principal),
the surety company that backs the bond, and the obligee/owner. The
surety company agrees to pay the obligee if you fail to meet your
obligations.
The benefit of a surety bond is that you don't need to have cash on
hand to cover the full value of the bond. You can purchase the bond
for a fee and only need to come up with the full amount if you fail to
meet your obligations.
PLACEMENT FEE
AND WHY IS IT REQUIRED
INSTITUTIONALIZING A NATIONAL
FACILITATION SERVICE NETWORK
THROUGH THE ESTABLISHMENT OF A
PUBLIC EMPLOYMENT SERVICE
OFFICE IN EVERY PROVINCE, KEY CITY
AND OTHER STRATEGIC AREAS
THROUGHOUT THE COUNTRY
Hawaii’s severe
manpower shortage
Post
WW institutionalized Filipino overseas
contract workers’ participation in
US defense and civilian projects
Waves of Filipino workers as
constructors and laborers in US Canada and Australia hired
military stations professional workers, mostly
medical workers
Asian nations opened labor markets for
construction and logging personnel
LEGISLATIVE BACKGROUND OF OVERSEAS EMPLOYMENT
PD 442
ACT 2486
- Paved the way for a stricter
- First law passed by the government regulation of the
Philippine Legislature in 1915 overseas employment industry
on overseas employment
- Creation of Overseas
- Provided for license issuance Employment Development
and license fee and welfare Board and the National
regulations, such as prohibiting Seamen Board
minors (under 15 years) to work
abroad without parent’s written
consent, prohibiting recruitment
of non-Christians for exhibition PD 1412
or display and provision of
transportation for returning - Revival of private sector
workers who are physically unfit participation in the recruitment
or have finished serving the and placement of Filipino
contract. workers
LEGISLATIVE BACKGROUND OF OVERSEAS EMPLOYMENT
EO 797 EO 247
c. Desertion or abandonment;
i. Theft or robbery;
j. Prostitution;
k. Vandalism or destroying company property;
l. Gunrunning or possession of deadly weapons;
m. Unjust refusal to depart for the worksite after all employment
and travel documents have been duly approved by the appropriate
government agency/ies; and
n. Violation/s of the laws and sacred practices of the host
country
and unjustified breach of government-approved employment contract
by a worker.
CASE IN POINT
Mckenzie, et al. vs. Cui, G.R. No. 48831, February 6, 1989 —
Facts: Aguedo, a licensed seaman, filed with the Regional Trial Court a
complaint for recovery of certain sums of money, with damages against
Kenneth and Kraamer as Administrative Manager and master of M.V. Carbay,
and its operator Wallem Philippines, pursuant to Article 2180 of the Civil Code.
He alleged that while M.V. Carbay was dry-docked in Japan, he was attacked
by his co-worker, an alleged protege of Kraamer; that without investigation,
Kraamer summarily dismissed him without paying his salary and thereafter
compelled him to return to Manila, incurring expenses in the amount of $320.
Defendants moved to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction and alleged that
the National Seamen’s Board (POEA now) has the exclusive jurisdiction over
cases in connection with the employment of Filipino seamen on board vessels
engaged in overseas trade.
The trial judge denied the motion.
RULING: The Supreme Court affirmed the order of the trial court, that is, the
court (not POEA) has jurisdiction over the case. Moreover, in his opposition to
the motion to dismiss, he cites Articles 2197, 2200, 2219 and adds the relevant
articles on Human Relations: Articles 19, 21, 24 and 32 of the Civil Code to
support his claim for damages. [This kind of case is not within POEA’s
jurisdiction].