Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Raw File
Raw File
Capital
Risk Weighted Assets and Leverage Ratio aspects to regulatory capital
More severe requirements (finalized and proposed) for 8 G-SIBs
Standardized approach under US rules
Applies to US institutions and FBO
Significantly increased capital requirements for indemnified securities lending
Haircut-based approach to exposure calculation
Counterparty risk weights of 20% (banks) or 100% (others)
TLAC will further exacerbate
Possible Standardized floor (S-CAR)
Large Exposures/Single Counterparty Credit Limits
Limits counterparty concentration to a percentage of capital
Haircut-based approach for securities lending exposures
Places limits on consolidated exposure to counterparties – daily limit / monthly compliance reports
General limit of 25% of banking group’s Tier 1 Capital of exposure to any single counterparty (and affiliates)
E.g., December 31, 2012 – Bank Tier 1 capital = $150 B
Bank standard exposure limit $37.5 B
24 U.S. top-tier bank holding companies and approximately 100 FBOs would be subject to all of or some
aspects of the enhanced standards
Federal Reserve projected in the rule between 15 and 20 of those FBOs would be required to
form a U.S. IHC
SNL found that FBOs had 17 U.S. subsidiaries with more than $50 billion in assets at the end of 2013
Compliance costs estimated to foreign banks could be up to €300 million
Central counterparties can allow for aggregate netting allowing for a more holistic approach that
lessens overall obligations, rather than having to apply the rules on a transaction-by-transaction basis.
One potential downside of central counterparties is the need to post margin, and the implications of
margin under the rule sets.
Looking to new counterparties, especially non-financial corporate clients and public sector entities,
can provide some relief, especially with regard to longerterm funding needs.
It is unclear how actively those clients want to participate in the financial markets.
Central counterparties can allow for aggregate netting allowing for a more holistic approach that
lessens overall obligations, rather than having to apply the rules on a transaction-by-transaction basis.
One potential downside of central counterparties is the need to post margin, and the implications of
margin under the rule sets.
Looking to new counterparties, especially non-financial corporate clients and public sector entities,
can provide some relief, especially with regard to longerterm funding needs.
It is unclear how actively those clients want to participate in the financial markets.
Timing:
Basel Committee: NSFR will become a minimum standard by January 1, 2018.
Federal Reserve anticipates finalizing a rule in 2015.
Applies to all banks, thrifts, BHCs, and SLHs subject to Advanced Approaches Rule