Professional Documents
Culture Documents
CLJS 116 .2 - Philosophy of Law
CLJS 116 .2 - Philosophy of Law
PHILOSOPHY OF LAW
Open Disclaimer
Guess who:
Charter of Human Rights and Freedoms
(excerpt)
Proceedings in criminal and penal matters
11. Any person charged with an offence has the right
(h) if finally acquitted of the offence, not to be tried for it again and, if finally found
guilty and punished for the offence, not to be tried or punished for it again
Timeline
1993 – Paul Bernardo and Karla Homolka arrested in connections to the rape and murder of victims:
Leslie Mahaffy, Kristen French and Tammy Homolka.
Karla Homolka scheduled for trial in 1993
Paul Bernardo scheduled for trial in 1995
1993 – Homolka offered a plea bargain. Sentenced to 12 years custody.
(assumption: bargain officered in exchange for her testimony against Benardo)
At some point after Homolka is offered plea bargain, and before Bernardo is put to trial, home movies
of their offences surfaced.
1994 – Publication ban of the home movies… BUT…
1995 – Bernardo sentenced to life imprisonment and receives a dangerous offender designation, making
it extremely unlikely he will ever be released on parole.
Aftermath
Philosophy
What is it we are trying to accomplish? (Rhetorical… for now)
Imprisonment
Capital Punishment
Community Supervision
Fines
Wrongful imprisonment.
"It is better
that ten
guilty
persons
escape than
Gaps in Justice
Why does the duty of the administration of justice fall to the state?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QXaMyP_RelU
More on Nassar, for anyone interested:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zv8MPXxA5LI
An Exercise in Thought:
Step 3: Why isn’t the Law the way I feel it should be?