Professional Documents
Culture Documents
John Keats - SD
John Keats - SD
John Keats - SD
(1795-1821)
Sarah Docker
EARLY LIFE
“I have vex'd you too much. But for Love! Can I help it? You are
always new. The last of your kisses was ever the gracefullest.
When you pass'd my window home yesterday, I was filled with as
much admiration as if I had then seen you for the first time. You
uttered a half complaint once that I only lov'd your Beauty. Have I
nothing else then to love in you but that? Do not I see a heart
naturally furnish'd with wings imprison itself with me? No ill
prospect has been able to turn your thoughts a moment from me.
This perhaps should be as much a subject of sorrow as joy–but I
will not talk of that…”
". . .I love you; all I can bring you is a swooning admiration of your
Beauty. . . . You absorb me in spite of myself--you alone: for I look not
forward with any pleasure to what is call'd being settled in the world; I
tremble at domestic cares--yet for you I would meet them, though if it
would leave you the happier I would rather die than do so. I have two
luxuries to brood over in my walks, your Loveliness and the hour of my
death. O that I could have possession of them both in the same minute. I
hate the world: it batters too much the wings of my self-will, and would I
could take a sweet poison from your lips to send me out of it. From no
others would I take it. I am indeed astonish'd to find myself so careless of
all charms but yours--remembering as I do the time when even a bit of
ribband was a matter of interest with me. What softer words can I find for
you after this--what it is I will not read. Nor will I say more here, but in a
Postscript answer any thing else you may have mentioned in your Letter
in so many words--for I am distracted with a thousand thoughts. I will
imagine you Venus tonight and pray, pray, pray to your star like a
HIS FINAL YEARS
Negative capability - the willingness to remain in doubt or not to resolve conflicts or ambiguities:
" . . several things dovetailed in my mind, & at once it struck me, what quality went
to form a Man of Achievement especially in Literature & which Shakespeare
possessed so enormously--I mean Negative Capability, that is when man is capable
of being in uncertainties, Mysteries, doubts, without any irritable reaching after fact
& reason--Coleridge, for instance, would let go by a fine isolated verisimilitude
caught from the Penetralium of mystery, from being incapable of remaining content
with half knowledge. This pursued through Volumes would perhaps take us no
further than this, that with a great poet the sense of Beauty overcomes every other
consideration, or rather obliterates all consideration.“
Read article: John Keats and ‘negative capability’ by Stephen Hebron (on OneNote)
“Keats emphasised that the artist had to avoid looking at life from a single
perspective. He was acutely aware that to capture the intensity of life, the artist had
to reveal life’s dual nature and the futility of any attempt to fix or rationalise it.”
Source: https://crossref-it.info/textguide/john-keats-selected-poems/40/2935
“Keats’ view is that true art of poetry is about the mind and feelings in a stage of
complexity and ambiguity” (Axel Kruse).
BEAUTY
• “John Keats is the last important poet of English Romanticism, but differently
from Byron and Shelley, he does not express rebellious or utopian ideas, and
differently from Wordsworth his poetry contains no moral and social message.
He thinks, in fact, the poet's task lies in search of beauty both in man and in
nature, since beauty is the only lasting value.”
• For Keats, the pursuit of “beauty overcomes every other consideration.”
(letter to George and Tom Keats [his brothers])
• “He believed that poetry is art driven by the imagination and a passion for
beauty” (Axel Kruse)
Source:
http://www.academia.edu/14610240/P.B.Shelley_and_keats_as_second_generation_romantic_poet
TRUTH
• 'I am certain of nothing save the holiness of the heart's affections and the truth
of the imagination. What the imagination seizes as Beauty must be
truth, whether it existed before or not’ (letter to Benjamin Bailey)
• In a different letter to J.H. Reynolds, Keats compares human life to a mansion
of large apartments he describes the 'chamber of maiden thought' in which 'we
become intoxicated with the light and the atmosphere. We see nothing but
pleasant wonders, and think of delaying there for ever in delight.’
• However, Keats argues that one must move on to the next phase 'of convincing
ones nerves that the World is full of misery and heartbreak, pain, sickness and
oppression - whereby this chamber of maiden thought becomes gradually
darkened - , many doors... all leading to dark passages - we see not the balance
of good and ill.'
IMAGINATION (CONT.)
• Keats has an impulse to interest himself in anything he saw or heard. He accepted it and identified
himself with it “If a sparrow comes before my window,” say Keats, “I take part in its existence and
pick about the gravel.” A poet, he says, has no identity. He is continually in, for and filling some
other body. “Of the poetic character,” Keats says, “it has no self; it is everything and nothing. It
enjoys light and shade; it lives in gusto, be it foul or fair, high or low, rich or poor, mean or
elevated. It has as much delight in conceiving an Iago [Shakespeare’s villain in Othello] or Imogene
[Shakespeare’s heroine in Cymbeline]. What shocks the virtuous philosopher delights the camelion
Poet.” (letter to Richard Woodhouse)
• Keats recognised the chameleon aspect of his own nature. He would watch sparrows from his
window and pick about with them in the gravel. He would imagine the delight a billiard ball might
take in its own roundness, in its smooth, rapid motion. More dramatically, he told Woodhouse how,
in a room full of people, he would quickly be ‘annihilated’ by the different identities pressing upon
him. But that was the nature of poets, of the men of genius Keats habitually measured himself
against. He told his friend Benjamin Bailey on 27 November 1817:
In passing however I must say one thing that has pressed upon me lately and increased my Humility
and capability of submission, and that is this truth – Men of Genius are great as certain ethereal
Chemicals operating on the Mass of neutral intellect – but they have not any individuality, any
determined Character.
Source: https://www.bl.uk/romantics-and-victorians/articles/john-keats-and-negative-capability
KEATS’ DISTRUST OF WOMEN
Before he met Fanny, Keats felt uncomfortable with women and contemptuous of them.
“...I am certain I have not a right feeling towards Women--at this moment I am striving to be just to them but I
cannot--Is it because they fall so far beneath my Boyish imagination? When I was a Schoolboy I thought a fair
Woman a pure Goddess, my mind was a soft nest in which some one of them slept though she knew it not--I have
no right to expect more than their reality. I thought them etherial above Men--I find them perhaps equal.... I do not
like to think insults in a Lady's Company--I commit a Crime with her which absence would have not known--Is it
not extraordinary? When among Men I have no evil thoughts, no malice, no spleen--I feel free to speak or to be
silent--I can listen and from every one I can learn--my hands are in my pockets I am free from all suspicion and
comfortable. When I am among Women I have evil thoughts, malice spleen--I cannot speak or be silent--I am full
of Suspicions and therefore listen to no thing--I am in a hurry to be gone--You must be charitable and put all this
perversity to my being disappointed since Boyhood–. . . I could say a good deal about this but I will leave it in
hopes of better and more worthy dispositions--and also content that I am wronging no one, for after all I do think
better of Womankind than to suppose they care whether Mister John Keats five feet high likes them or not.”
THE FOLLOWING FOUR
EXTRACTS ARE FROM JOHN
BARNARD’S INTRODUCTION