Critique Paper PresentationPresentation

You might also like

Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 8

Critique Paper Presentation

Towards Developing a Sustainable Food


Systems Education Curriculum In
Elementary Education

Presented to:
TLE 502: Home Economics
Introduction

The study "Towards Developing a Sustainable Food Systems Education


Curriculum in Elementary Education" by Rodante Parillas Avila (2018) addresses
the integration of sustainable food systems into the elementary school curriculum
in the Philippines. This paper explores the opportunities and strategies for
embedding Agriculture and Home Economics into the educational framework,
aiming to tackle issues such as food sovereignty, malnutrition, and poverty (Avila,
2018).
Summary

Avila's research employs a Participatory Action Research (PAR)


methodology to engage communities in the development of a curriculum
that promotes sustainable food systems. The study's primary goal is to
create a curriculum that equips students with practical knowledge and
skills in agriculture and home economics, enhancing their understanding
of sustainable practices.
Strengths

The research is highly relevant to the Philippines, addressing critical


issues such as food insecurity, malnutrition, and poverty. By focusing on
sustainable food systems, the study aligns with national and global goals
of achieving food sovereignty and sustainable development. Utilizing
PAR allows for active community participation, ensuring that the
curriculum is tailored to the specific needs and contexts of the local
population.
Strengths

This approach fosters a sense of ownership and relevance among


stakeholders. Additionally, the integration of Agriculture and Home
Economics provides students with hands-on learning experiences,
preparing them for real-world challenges. This practical orientation can
enhance student engagement and retention of knowledge.
Critique

1. The limited scope of implementation.


2. Study relies heavily on qualitative data gathered
through participatory methods.
3. Challenge in teacher training.
Critique

1. The limited scope of implementation.


2. Study relies heavily on qualitative data gathered
through participatory methods.
3. Challenge in teacher training.
4. There is insufficient discussion on the long-term
impacts and sustainability of the curriculum.
Conclusion
1. Rodante Parillas Avila’s research makes a significant contribution to addressing
food security and education in the Philippines. By proposing a curriculum that
integrates Agriculture and Home Economics, it provides a robust framework for
educating young students on sustainable food practices. However, the study
would benefit from more detailed implementation strategies, broader research
scope, clear assessment metrics, and consideration of long-term impacts. Overall,
the research sets a strong foundation for future work in this essential area of
education.

You might also like