Professional Documents
Culture Documents
personality assessment 2
personality assessment 2
and testing
MEANING AND PURPOSE OF PERSONALITY ASSESSMENT
Personality assessment
Robert McCrae and Paul Costa: Developed the Five Factor Model (FFM) of
personality, also known as the Big Five, which includes dimensions of Openness,
Conscientiousness, Extraversion, Agreeableness, and Neuroticism.
David Keirsey: Developed the Keirsey Temperament Sorter, a personality
assessment tool based on Carl Jung’s theories, which categorizes individuals into
four temperament types: Artisan, Guardian, Idealist, and Rational.
Cont..
Walter Mischel: Known for his critique of trait theories and the concept of
situationism, which suggests that behavior is influenced more by situational
factors than stable personality traits.These psychologists have played key roles in
shaping our understanding of personality and developing various theories,
models, and assessment tools that continue to be influential in the field of
psychology today.
Purpose
There are various types of personality tests, each assessing different aspects of an
individual’s personality. Some common types include:
Trait-based tests: These assess enduring qualities or traits that individuals possess,
such as the Big Five personality traits (Openness, Conscientiousness,
Extraversion, Agreeableness, Neuroticism).
Psychodynamic tests: Rooted in Freudian theory, these tests explore unconscious
thoughts, feelings, and motivations, such as the Rorschach Inkblot Test or the
Thematic Apperception Test (TAT).
Cont…
Examples:
Examples of objective tests include the NEO Personality Inventory (NEO-PI),
which measures the Big Five personality traits; the Minnesota Multiphasic
Personality Inventory (MMPI), which assesses various psychological disorders
and personality characteristics; and the 16PF Questionnaire, which evaluates an
individual’s personality across multiple dimensions.
Subjective tests
Qualitative data:
Responses to subjective tests yield qualitative data, which can be more nuanced and
context-dependent compared to the quantitative data obtained from objective tests.
Analyzing subjective responses often involves subjective judgment and
interpretation by the examiner or researcher.
Flexibility: Subjective tests allow for greater flexibility in responses, allowing test-
takers to express their thoughts, feelings, and opinions in a more personalized
manner. This flexibility can provide deeper insights into an individual’s mindset,
attitudes, and beliefs.
Interpretation: Since subjective tests involve qualitative data, their interpretation can
be more subjective and prone to bias compared to the more objective scoring of
objective tests. Examiner bias and individual differences in interpretation may
influence the assessment process and results.
Examples
Examples: Examples of subjective tests include projective tests like the Rorschach
Inkblot Test and the Thematic Apperception Test (TAT), which present ambiguous
stimuli for individuals to interpret and respond to based on their perceptions and
experiences. Subjective tests are also common in essay-based assessments,
interviews, and qualitative research methods.
Projective tests