Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Understanding the EU Green Bond Standard_Lexology(585435903.1)
Understanding the EU Green Bond Standard_Lexology(585435903.1)
Bond Standard
Caroline Phillips, Sabine Dittrich, Minolee
Shah, Peaches Stanforth
Introduction
Minolee Shah
Peaches Stanforth
Professional Support Counsel
Associate
+44 (0)20 7090 5491
+44 (0)20 7090 3369
minolee.shah@slaughterandmay.com
Peaches.stanforth@slaughterandmay.com
Agenda
1. Introduction
2. Defining the EU Green Bond Standard
3. Key Provisions
a. EU Taxonomy-Alignment
b. Grandfathering and Capex Plans
c. Sovereigns
d. Factsheets and Reporting
e. External Reviewer Regime
f. Optional Disclosure Regime
4. Comparison to ICMA Principles
5. The Future of the Label
6. UK Position
Aims:
• Increase the financial flows to green investments and assets.
• Enhance transparency, comparability, accountability and credibility of EU Green Bonds.
• Address barriers to green bond market development.
Who can use the label? What products are covered? Where does the EU GBS fit in?
The EU GBS is a voluntary gold The EU GBS is for ‘use of proceeds’ A wider ecosystem of other EU
standard available to all issuers inside green bonds. The Regulation also has sustainable finance legislation.
and outside the EU. an additional opt in disclosure regime
for other ESG bonds.
The proceeds (from which Alternatively, issuers could Taxonomy Regulation 15% Flexibility pocket: where
issuance costs can be allocate proceeds from a compliance requires that the there are no relevant TSC in
deducted) need to have been portfolio of one or more activity (to which the force on issue or for
fully allocated to fixed outstanding European green proceeds are applied) must internationally reported
assets, capital expenditures, bonds to a portfolio of fixed (i) contribute substantially to green finance support.
operating expenditures, assets or financial assets one or more of the six
financial assets or assets and (according to the EU environmental objectives, (ii)
expenditures of households Taxonomy requirements). comply with the TSC, (iii) do
according to the criteria set no significant harm to any of
out in Article 3 of the EU the other environmental
Taxonomy Regulation. objectives; and (iv) be
carried out in accordance
with minimum safeguards.
The delegated acts adopted as part of Issuers are able to apply the technical Unallocated proceeds and proceeds
the EU Taxonomy are to be subject to screening criteria applicable at issue covered by a Capex plan that have not
review and amendment, reflecting the when allocating the proceeds to yet met the EU Taxonomy
need for the technical screening eligible fixed assets or expenditures. requirements must comply with the
criteria to be dynamic and to allow amended technical screening criteria
for technological and scientific within seven years.
advances to be reflected.
CSRD
SFDR
PUBLICATION OF GREEN
BOND FACTSHEET
• ANNUAL ALLOCATION REPORTS FINAL ALLOCATION
A pre-issuance external review on the
factsheet is required. REPORT
• Information on allocation of bond
proceeds.
• Progress on implementation of Capex
plan (if applicable).
• Must be prepared annually until full IMPACT REPORT
allocation.
• External review on report required.
• Required after full
allocation of
REPORTS AND proceeds.
FACTSHEET TO BE
* And completion of Capex plan if applicable PUBLICLY AVAILABLE
Mandatory pre-issuance review of factsheet and post-issuance review of allocation reports. Optional post-issuance
Requirement review of impact reports.
The new regime requires reviewers of EU Green Bonds to register with ESMA and meet various organisational and
Regime governance conditions for registration and ongoing supervision.
ESMA is empowered to develop regulatory technical standards specifying a number of detailed requirements relating
ESMA to registration within 24 months of the EU GBS coming into force (draft proposals have now been published).
To allow time for reviewers to adapt to the new regime, the EU GBS allows a limited transition period of 18 months
Transition where reviewers can provide their services as long as they notify ESMA and comply with requirements on a ‘best
efforts’ basis.
The new supervisory regime is likely to be well received given the importance of external reviews to investors and
Market Reaction the need for consistency and transparency across providers.
Securitisation
• A separate regime for securitisation.
Voluntary Voluntary, market-based principles Voluntary but must comply with all aspects of the EU GBS
Regulation. “Gold standard”
Use of Proceeds Wider scope of eligible green projects (high level) under ICMA GBP Sustainable economic activities defined by the EU Taxonomy
Regulation (subject to 15% flexibility pocket)
Framework/ Framework recommended, no prescribed format Factsheet required, prescribed format and content requirements
Factsheet including detail on transition plans
Reporting Allocation reporting required. Annual report to include list of Allocation report and impact report required with specified content
projects allocated proceeds, amounts and expected impact and format requirements
External Pre-issuance external review recommended, post-issuance Detailed requirements under EU GBS. Subject to new registration
Reviewers tracking/allocation of proceeds by auditor/third party and supervision regime by ESMA
recommended.
Prospectus / No requirement for EU Prospectus Regulation compliant prospectus Must prepare EU Prospectus Regulation compliant prospectus (unless
Listing exempt)
Restrictions N/A Certain jurisdictions are restricted from using the EU GBS on the
grounds of being non-cooperative for tax or being classed as high-
risk.
EU • Concerns around data availability, heavy reliance on EU legislation and criteria (which
Taxonomy
will impact the ability to assess non-EU projects) and a current lack of taxonomy assets.
Usability
• Tougher sanctions under the EU GBS will weigh heavily on the minds of issuers who are
increasingly cognisant of reputational and litigation risks when preparing their ESG bond
Sanctions
prospectuses.
• Issuers will need to consider the additional costs in preparing an EU GBS compliant
Costs prospectus (in line with the EU Prospectus Regulation) and factsheet as well as external
review / reporting costs.