REPLACEMENT OF COARSE AGGREGATE BY

WASTE GLASS IN CONCRETE

UNDER THE GUIDANCE OF
ARPITH .L DCE , BE
Lecturer
Department Of Civil Engineering

STUDENTS NAME
B R . SACHIN 563CE15008
DILEEP .R.V 563CE15013
HARISH .T.G 563CE15015
BHARATH .M.S 563CE14010
ROHITH SINGH .L 563CE15038
NIKHIL T HUDED 308CE14035

PES POLYTECHNIC
 CONTENTS
 NEED FOR RESEARCH
 INTRODUCTION

 LITERATURE REVIEW

 AIMS AND OBJECTIVES

 RESEARCH OUTCOME

 METHODOLOGY

 TEST ON MATERIALS

 MIX PROPORTIONING

 QUANTITY CALCULATION

 RESULTS

 CONCLUSION

 REFERENCE
NEED FOR RESEARCH
 Increaseinterest in use of waste glass as coarse
aggregate.

 Effect on environment.

 Utilization of glass industrial by products.

 Increase in cost of conventional materials.

 INTRODUCTION
 Due to sustained pressure of waste glasses means
12.5 billion tons in INDIA waste glass producing /
annum.

 Development of green concrete based infra

structure.

 Increased cost of coarse aggregate.

 77% disposed off as land fill.

 Avoid risk of public health.

LITERATURE REVIEW
Glass is the one of the oldest man-made materials. It is produced in
many forms such as packaging or container glass, and bulb glass,
all of which have a limited life in their manufactured forms and
therefore need to be recycled as to be reusable in order to avoid
environmental problem that would be created if they were to be
stockpiled or sent to landfills. The construction industry has shown
great grains in recycling of industrial by-products and waste,
including waste glass materials.
Quantities of waste glass have been rising rapidly during the recent
decades due to the high increase in industrialisation and the
considerable improvement in the standards of living, but
unfortunately, the majority of these waste quantities are not being
recycled but rather abandoned causing certain serious problems
such as the waste of natural recourses and environmental pollution.
 AIMS & OBJECTIVES
 To over come coarse aggregate shortage issue.
 Reducing environmental effect.

 Economy.

 Reusing industrial waste glass.

 Good way of disposing.

 Save money , time , labour cost.

RESEARCH OUT COME
 Flooring works

 Steps works .

 Chejja ,slope roof.

RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
1
* Need for
5 research
Discussion * Literature
Results review
analysis * Material
Conclusion availability
* Material
collection
2
4
* Material
* Fresh & Hard Characterizatio
concrete test n
* Slump * Physical test
* Compression * shape
&
3 * Specific
Split tensile test gravity
* Mix
Flexural designing *consistency
strength
*Replacem
ent %
0%
30%
40%
50%
 TESTS ON CEMENT

Slno Properties Test results IS:12269-1987

requirements.

1 Specific gravity 3.15 3.15

2 Standard 37% -
consistency
3 Initial setting time 58min Not less than 30 min.

4 Final setting time 220min Less than 600min

5 Fineness 5% -
PHYSICAL PROPERTIES OF FINE
AGGREGATES
Sl.no Properties Test results

1 Specific gravity 2.62

2 Grading of aggregate Zone 2

3 Moisture content 1.68 %

4 Bulk density 25.2 %

TESTS ON COARSE AGGREGATE
Sl Properties Test results
no
1 Specific gravity 2.7
2 Water absorption 0.32%

3 Flakiness index 14.52%

4 Elongation index 9.25%

5 Crushing value 26.89%

6 Impact value 15.03%
7 Angularity
9.446
number
SIEVE TESTS ON COARSE
AGGREGATE
Percentage
Sieve no.
passing

40mm 100

20mm 46.85
16mm 15.60
12.5mm 6.76
10mm 0.62
6.3mm 0.12
4.75mm 0.12

Pan 0
PROPERTIES OF WASTE GLASS
Colour Transparent white

Specific gravity 2.5

Impact 14.32%

Size 12.5mm – 4.75mm

MIX PROPORTION FOR M20
CONCRETE
 Conventional concrete------1: 1.55: 2.50: 0.45

 30% WG replacement------1: 1.55: 1.75: 0.69 :0.45

 40% WG replacement----- -1: 1.55: 1.50: 0.92 :0.45

 50% WG replacement------1: 1.55: 1.25 : 1.16 :0.45

CONCRETE MIX PROPORTIONING

A-1 STIPULATIONS FOR PROPORTIONING

a)Grade designation : M 20
b)Type of cement : OPC 43 grade confirming to IS 811
c)Maximum nominal size of aggregate : 20 mm
d)Minimum cement content : 320 kg/m3
e)Maximum water-cement ratio : 0.45
f)Workability : 100 mm (slump)
g)Exposure condition : Severe (for reinforced concrete)
h)Method concrete placing :
i)Degree of supervision : Good
j)Type of aggregate : Crushed angular aggregate
k)Maximum cement content : 450 kg/m3
l)Chemical admixture type : Nil
 A-2 TEST DATA FOR MATERIALS
a)Cement used : OPC 43 grade confirming to IS 8112
b)Specific gravity of cement : 3.15
c)Chemical admixture : Nil
d)Specific gravity of :
1) Coarse aggregate : 2.74
2) Fine aggregate : 2.74
e)Water absorption
1) Coarse aggregate : 0.5 percent
2) Fine aggregate : 1.0 percent
f) Free (surface) moisture : Nil (absorbed moisture nil)
1) Coarse aggregate : Nil
2) Fine aggregate : Nil
g) Sieve analysis:
1) Coarse aggregate : Confirming to Table 2 of IS 383
2) Fine aggregate : Confirming to grading Zone 1 of
Table 4 of IS 383
A-3 TARGET STRENGTH FOR MIX PROPORTIONING
f’ck = fck + 1.65 s
where
f’ck = target average compressive strength at 28 days
fck = characteristic compressive strength at 28 days , and
s = standard deviation
From Table 1, standard deviation, s = 5N/mm2
Therefore, target strength = 40 + 1.65 X 5 = 48.25 N/mm2
A-4 SELECTION OF WATER-CEMENT RATIO
From Table 5 of IS 456, maximum water-cement ratio = 0.45
A-5 SELECTION OF WATER CONTENT
From Table 2, maximum water content = 186 liter (25 to 50 mm slump range)
For 20mm aggregate
Estimated water content for 100 mm slump = 186+ 6/100 X 186
= 197 liter
A-6 CALCULATION OF CEMENT CONTENT
Water-cement ratio = 0.45
Cement = 197/0.45 = 438 kg/m 3
From Table 5 of IS 456, minimum cement
Content for ‘sever’ exposure condition = 320 kg/m3
350 kg/m3 ˃ 320 kg/m3 , hence, O.K.
A-7 PROPORTIONING OF VOLUME OF
COARSE AGGREGATE AND FINE AGGREGATE CONTENT
0.50 = 0.60
From Table 3, volume of coarse aggregate corresponding to 20mm size aggregate
Is required to increased to decrease the fine aggregate content. As the water cement
ratio is lower by 0.10, the proportion of volume of coarse aggregate is increased by
0.01 (at the rate of -/+ for every +/- 0.05 change in water-cement ratio). Therefore,
corrected proportion of volume coarse aggregate for the water-cement ratio of
0.45=0.61.
Volume of coarse aggregate = 0.61
Volume of fine aggregate = 1-0.61 = 0.39
A-8 MIX CALCULATIONS
The mix calculations per unit volume of concrete shall be as follows:
a)Volume of concrete = 1 m3
b)Volume of cement = Mass of cement X 1
Specific gravity of cement 1000
= 438 X 1
3.15 1000
= 0.139 m3
c)Volume of water = Mass of water X 1
Specific gravity of cement 1000
= 197 X 1
1 1000
= 0.197 m3
d)Volume of all in aggregate = [a-(b+c)]
= 1- (0.139+0.197)
= 0.664 m3
e) Mass of coarse aggregate = d X Volume of coarse aggregate X Specific-
-gravity of coarse aggregate X 1000
= 0.664 × 0.61 × 2.74 × 1000
= 1109 kg
f) Mass of fine aggregate = d X Volume of fine aggregate X Specific-
-gravity of fne aggregate X 1000
= 0.664 × 0.39 × 2.74 × 1000
= 709 kg
A-9 MIX PROPORTION

Cement = 438 kg/m3

Water = 197 liter
Fine aggregate = 709 kg/m3
Coarse aggregate = 1109 kg/m3
Water-cement ratio =0.45
ESTIMATION OF MATERIALS FOR
ONE CONCRETE CUBE

PERCENTAGE Cement in Fine Coarse Waste glass Water

OF kg aggregate aggregate aggregate cement
WASTE in kg in kg in kg ratio
GLASS

0 1.630 2.526 4.075 ------------- 0.450

30 1.653 2.562 2.887 1.138 0.450

40 1.659 2.571 2.448 1.526 0.450

50 1.663 2.577 2.078 1.929 0.450

ESTIMATION OF MATERIALS FOR ONE
CONCRETE CYLINDER
PERCENTAGE Cement in Fine Coarse Waste glass Water
OF WASTE kg aggregate in aggregate in aggregate in cement
GLASS kg kg kg ratio

0 2.570 3.980 6.425 ------------- 0.450

30 2.599 4.014 4.548 1.793 0.450

40 2.609 4.043 3.913 2.400 0.450

50 2.615 4.053 3.268 3.033 0.450

ESTIMATION OF MATERIALS FOR
ONE CONCRETE BEAM
PERCENTAGE Cement in Fine Coarse Waste glass Water
OF WASTE kg aggregate aggregate aggregate cement
GLASS in kg in kg in kg ratio

0 2.42 3.751 6.05 ------------- 0.450

30 2.45 3.797 4.287 1.690 0.450

40 2.460 3.813 3.690 2.263 0.450

50 2.465 3.820 3.081 2.859 0.450

 DETAILS OF WORKABILITY
RESULTS :-

Water Waste glass Slump

cement (%) value (cm)
ratio

0.450 0 1.2

0.450 30 8.9

0.450 40 12.5

0.450 50 18.9
PROPERTIES OF HARDENED CONCRETE
Type of mould W/C Ratio Waste glass % Compressive strength ( N/mm2)

7 days 14 days 28 days

cube 0.45 0 19.3 23.71 28.65

30 22.9 27.52 32.15

40 22.4 25.64 30.55

50 17.5 24.47 27.02

 COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH
Type of mould W/C Ratio Waste glass % Compressive strength ( N/mm2)

7 days 14 days 28 days

cube 0.45 0 19.3 23.71 28.65

30 22.9 27.52 32.15

40 22.4 25.64 30.55

50 17.5 24.47 27.02

 SPLIT TENSILE STRENGTH

Type of mould W/C Ratio Waste glass % Split tensile strength ( N/mm2)

7 days 14 days 28 days

cylinder 0.45 0 2.8 3.18 3.38

30 3.1 6.38 7.46

40 2.6 3.50 4.34

50 1.18 2.40 3.21

 FLEXURAL STRENGTH
Type of mould W/C Ratio Waste glass % Flexural strength ( N/mm2)

7 days 14 days 28 days

beam 0.45 0 2.16 2.59 3.1

30 2.23 3.22 3.5

40 2.15 2.46 3.2

50 1.18 2.35 2.9

 DENSITY OF CONCRETE

Replacement of Density

Waste glass in % In kg/m3

0 2462.52
30 2386.66

40 2364.44
50 2343.22
TESTS
INTERPRETATION OF TEST RESULTS
WORKABILITY V/S PERCENTAGE OF WASTE GLASS REPLACEMENT

slump value
25

20
slump value (cm)

15
slump value
10

0
0 30 40 50
% of waste glass replacement
COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH V/S
PERCENTAGE OF WG
REPLACEMENT
compressive strength results v/s % waste glass re-
placement
35
compressive strength N/MM2

30
25
7days
20 14 days
15 28 days
10
5
0
0 30 40 50
percentage of waste glass replacement
TENSILE STRENGTH (V/S )PERCENTAGE OF
WASTE GLASS REPLACEMENT

split tensile strength v/s % waste glass replacement

8
split tensile strength N/MM2

7
6
5
7 days
4 14 days
3 28 days
2
1
0
0 30 40 50
% of waste glass replacement
FLEXURAL STRENGTH V/S PERCENTAGE OF WG
REPLACEMENT
flexural strength v/s % waste glass replacement
4
3.5
flexural strength n/mm2

3
2.5 7 days
2 14 days
1.5 28 days
1
0.5
0
0 30 40 50
% of waste glass replacement
DENSITY VALUE V/S % WASTE
GLASS REPLACEMENT

density value
2380
density value kg/m3

2370
2360
2350 density value
2340
2330
2320
0 30 40 50
% of glass replacement
CONCLUSION
 Strength

 Workability

 Density

 Application
 REFERENCE
 Google.
 WORK team , “pollution caused by solid waste, rubble, and
construction debris is a serious threat to the sea and the shore
of the gaza strip”. OCHA 2009.
 Husni Al-Nazar, “solid waste management in the gaza strip
case study” ministry of health , Gaza 2005.
 CSIRO manufacturing and infrastructure technology,
WWW.cmit.csiro.an.DEC.2010
 Meyer,c.,Egosi, N., and Andela , C., “concrete with a waste
glass as coarse aggregate, Dundee, march 19-20,2001.
THANK YOU
WASTE IS NOT A WASTE