Pakistans Spy Agencies: Challenges of Civilian Control over Intelligence Agencies Bureaucratic and Military Stakeholderism, Dematerialization of Civilian Intelligence, and War of Strength
• Bureaucracy plays a crucial role in a country's government,
implementing policies and decisions, and governing the country. Pakistani bureaucrats, who inherited the legacy of British India's "royal servants," are considered rulers rather than servants of the public. • The political landscape of Pakistan is significantly shaped by the interplay between civil and military bureaucracies. • The civil bureaucracy refers to the administrative framework responsible for implementing government policies, while the military bureaucracy pertains to the hierarchical structure of the armed forces. Historical Context
• Pakistan's history has been marked by military rule and
interference in civilian affairs, starting with the first coup in 1958 led by General Ayub Khan. • The military's involvement in politics has been a pattern since the regimes of Generals Zia-ul-Haq (1977) and Pervez Musharraf (1999). • This mistrust and interference in civilian institutions has damaged public faith and led some to believe the military has more power than the elected government, hindering the country's progress towards a stable and democratic political system. Civil Bureaucracy in Pakistan
• Bureaucrats, recruited on merit and provided with professional
training, are responsible for managing day-to-day state affairs. They are neutral, honest, dedicated, and faithful in their duties, and their positions remain unchanged despite government changes. • The Pakistan Administrative Service is the most prominent service in the civil bureaucracy, playing a crucial role in policy implementation, public administration, and service delivery. However, challenges such as corruption, inefficiency, and political interference have undermined the effectiveness and public trust of the civil bureaucracy in Pakistan. Military Bureaucracy in Pakistan
• Pakistan's military bureaucracy is a disciplined structure,
with the Pakistan Army as the dominant force. • The military's influence extends beyond defense to political and economic spheres, often overshadowing civilian institutions. The military views itself as the "guardian of the nation" and is responsible for defending the nation from internal and external threats. This entitlement has led to its involvement in politics. • However, the lack of civilian oversight complicates matters, as the army chief has significant sway over the president and administration. Civil-Military Relations
• Pakistan's military has historically been involved in political
interference, often withdrawing from politics when it suited its interests. However, the military's involvement in domestic politics is evident in the recent ouster of Prime Minister Khan. • The military's support for Khan's regime was rescinded amid disagreements over the appointment of Pakistan's intelligence chief and foreign policy. This marked the continuation of a trend where handpicked prime ministers who pursue policies independent of the military's institutional thinking have been removed from power. • The military's involvement in domestic politics is a significant issue in Pakistan, as seen in the recent ouster of Khan. Impact on Governance and Development
• The dominance of the military in Pakistan's political
sphere has had mixed impacts on governance and development. • While military regimes have sometimes implemented effective policies, the lack of democratic accountability has led to governance issues. • Economic policies under military rule have varied, with some successes in infrastructure development but also significant challenges in achieving sustainable growth. Reforms and Recommendations
• Reforming the civil and military bureaucracy is
essential for Pakistan's progress. Strengthening civilian institutions, ensuring accountability, and reducing corruption are critical steps. • Enhancing civil-military relations through dialogue and clear delineation of roles can lead to a more balanced governance structure. • International support and internal reforms are necessary to achieve these goals. Conclusion
• The interaction between civil and military
bureaucracy in Pakistan significantly impacts the country's political and administrative landscape. • To ensure effective governance and sustainable development, Pakistan must address challenges within these institutions through reforms promoting transparency, accountability, and a balanced power dynamic, ensuring a more transparent and accountable system.
Pakistans Spy Agencies: Challenges of Civilian Control over Intelligence Agencies Bureaucratic and Military Stakeholderism, Dematerialization of Civilian Intelligence, and War of Strength