Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Environmental Monitoring and Ecosystem Restoration (1)
Environmental Monitoring and Ecosystem Restoration (1)
• The incentives so received from REDD+ would be passed to the local communities involved in protection and
management of the forests. This will ensure sustained protection of our forests against deforestation.
Will India Benefit from REDD+?
India's sustained efforts for conserving and expanding its forest and tree
resources have the possibility of being rewarded for providing carbon
service to the international community in addition to providing traditional
goods and services to the local communities.
India believes REDD needs to be seen in the broader context of REDD+, not in
isolation or in a truncated form since reduction of deforestation, and conservation
and improvement of forests are two sides of the same coin, and so should be
treated at par.
India's stand was finally accepted in 13th Meeting of the Conference of the Parties
(COP 13) at Bali when elements of conservation, sustainable management of forests
and enhancement of forest carbon stocks were added to the then existing text of
reducing deforestation and forest degradation as part of Bali Action Plan.
It has presented an ambitious Green India Mission programme under its National
Action Plan on Climate Change.
India‘s initiatives related to REDD+
• Gaddi & Gujjar Tribes: The Gaddi and Gujjar tribes in the Himalayan
states control the grazing of cattle, which helps to preserve
biodiversity by preventing the development of wild grass.
• Preservation of Forest Rights: Together with the Forest Rights Act, the Panchayat
(Extension to Scheduled Areas) Act of 1996 significantly contributes to ensuring the
rights of forest residents.
• Maintenance of Gender Balance: The Joint Forest Management
Committee (JFMC) maintains gender balance with a dedicated
women's subcommittee.
Challenges
Joint Forest Management - Challenges
Nature of Passed Laws: Laws like the Forest Rights Act (FRA), 2006, and the Panchayat Extension to Scheduled Areas
(PESA) Act, 1996, have been passed, granting indigenous peoples and people who live in forests management rights
over forest resources.
Need for Funds: Communities seek the considerable funds that the forest departments owe them as part of the scheme.
Dilemma: There are concerns over whether the program should be discontinued.
Expensive Nature: JFM program implementation is expensive. For instance, afforestation costs around Rs 20,000 per
acre.
Lack of Legal Rights: Forest Protection Committees (FPC) lack legal standing as well as financial and executive authority.
Discretionary Power: In several States, the Forest Department has the discretionary authority to dissolve FPCs.
Ineffective Plan & Management: Ineffective management and micro-plan design is another major challenge faced by
Joint Forest Management.
Participation of Women: Despite having formal representation on management committees, women don't participate.
Local Conflicts: Conflicts between and within communities hinder the operation of the Forest Protection Committees
(FPC).
Ecological Impact