ELIGIBILITY FOR

ASSESSMENT AND
ACCREDITATION BY NAAC
Weightage :(200)
• Key Indicators : 7
1. Student Enrolment and Profile : 10
2. Catering to Student Diversity :20
3. Teaching-Learning Process :20
4. Teacher Profile and Quality :20
5. Evaluation Process and Reforms:40
6. Student Performance and Learning Outcomes :30
7. Student Satisfaction Survey :30

• Total Metrics: 19
• Qnm- 12 (118) and Qlm - 6 (52) + SSS(30)
Criterion-2
• Student Enrolment and Profile (10)
2. • 2 Qnm(5+5)
1
• Catering to Student Diversity(20)
2. • 1 Qnm(10) + 1 Qlm(10)
2
• Teaching-Learning Process (20)
2. • 1 Qnm(8) + 2 Qlm(6+6)
3
Teaching Learning • Teacher Profile and Quality (50)
2. • 4 Qnm ( 15+15+10+10)
4
• Evaluation Process and Reforms (40)
2. • 3 Qnm ( 15+10+5) + 1 Qlm(10)
5
Evaluation • Student Performance and Learning Outcomes (30)
2. •1 Qnm ( 10) + 2 Qlm (10+10)
6

• Online Student Satisfaction Survey (30)

2.
7
 2.1. Student Enrolment and Profile (10)
2.1.1 : Qnm (05)
Demand Ratio
Number of seats available year-
wise during the last five years
• Number of seats available in
all the Programmes
• Total number of eligible
applications received
• Total number of Seats filled
against sanctioned seats
2.1.2 : Qnm (05)
Average percentage of seats filled
against reserved categories (SC, ST,
OBC, Divyangjan, etc.)
• Number of students admitted from
the reserved category
• Total number of seats earmarked
for reserved category as per GOI or
State Government rule
 2.2. Catering to Student Diversity (20)

2.2.1 : Qlm (10)

2.2.2 : Qnm (10)

The institution assesses Student- Full time teacher ratio

the learning levels of
the students and
Certified list of full-time teachers
organizes special along with the university affiliation in
Programmes for the latest completed academic year.
List showing the number of students
advanced learners and across all year in each of the programs
slow learners. in the latest completed academic year.
Documents
 2.5 Evaluation Process and reforms (40) Qlm
Qnm – 30 Qlm-10
2.5.1 Average number of days from the date of
last semester-end/ year- end examination till the 2.5.3 IT integration and
declaration of results – 15 reforms in the examination
procedures and processes
2.5.2 Average percentage of student (continuous internal
complaints/grievances about evaluation against assessment and end-
total number appeared in the examinations -10 semester assessment) have
brought in considerable
2.5.4 Status of automation of Examination improvement in
division along with approved Examination examination management
Manual-05 •100% automation of entire division & implementation of system of the institution
Examination Management System (EMS)
•Only student registration, Hall ticket issue & Result
Processing
•Only student registration and result processing
•Only result processing
•Only manual methodology
2.6 Student Performance and Learning Outcomes (30)
2.6.1 The institution has stated
learning outcomes (generic and Documents:
programme specific)/graduate
attributes which are integrated • Link of PO,CO and PSO on
into the assessment process and
widely publicized through the website
website and other documents • Method of measuring the
(10) Qlm
level of attainment of POs ,
2.6.2 Attainment of Programme PSOs and COs
Outcomes, Programme Specific • List of Programmes and
Outcomes and Course Outcomes
are evaluated by the number of students passed
institution(10) Qlm and appeared in the final
2.6.3 Pass percentage of
year examination
students (10) Qnm
2.7 Online Student Satiffection Survey (30)
( Online survey to be conducted)

Data Requirements: (As per Data Template)

 Name/ Class/ Gender
 Student Id number/ Aadhar number
 Mobile number
 Email id
 Degree Programme
(Database of all currently enrolled students need to be
prepared and shared with NAAC along with the online
submission of QIF)