CELLPHONE PROHIBITION ADHERENCE AMONG STUDENTS OF

DON JOSE INTEGRATED HIGH SCHOOL: AN INPUT IN

CRAFTING POLICY IN STUDENT HANDBOOK

Agullana, Mark Leonell V.

Completo, Argo T.
Corciega, Mushi Grace R.
Galgao , Erica Joy N.
Genobiagon, John Michael G.
Hallig, Lara E.
Morales, Arianne Mae C.
Introduction
Despite the rules that prohibits cellphone use
during classes at Don Jose Integrated High School,
there is a noticeable and ongoing use of these devices.
This study aims to understand how well students
adhere to the cellphone prohibition, considering
factors like demographic profiles , awareness, and
compliance.
Statement of the Problem
This study aims to provide a comprehensive understanding regarding cellphone prohibition

adherence of students of Don Jose Integrated High School. Specifically, it aims to answer the

following questions:

1. What are the demographic profile of students in terms of:

1.1. Grade level;

1.2. Age;

1.3. Socioeconomic status; and

1.4. Academic performance?

Statement of the Problem
2. What is the level of cellphone prohibition adherence of Don Jose Integrated
High School students in terms of:
2.1. Awareness; and
2.2. Compliance

3. Is there a significant difference in the level of cellphone prohibition adherence of

students of Don Jose Integrated High School if they are grouped according to their
demographic profile?

4. Based on the findings, what input can be made in crafting policy about
cellphone prohibition adherence in student handbook?
Scope and Limitation of the Study
The respondents in this study comprise students of Don Jose Integrated High
School during the academic year 2023-2024. Data collection will be conducted
through surveys, with the students representing different grade levels.

The small sample size may limit the generalizability of findings, and the
exclusive focus on a single school might not capture variations in cellphone
prohibition adherence across diverse educational environments. Changes in
technology or societal attitudes towards cellphone use over time could affect the
study's relevance. Moreover, reliance on self-report data introduces the potential for
response bias.
Significance of the Study
The study on cellphone usage benefits various stakeholders:

Students.Gain insights into their cellphone usage, aiding academic focus.

Parents.Encourages collaboration with schools, helping guide children's cellphone
use.
Teachers. Allows adaptation of teaching methods based on cellphone impact on
engagement.
School Policymakers. Refine policies for better learning environments.
Future Researchers. Serves as a reference for future studies.
Researcher. Provides insights into cellphone prohibition adherence.

School.Helps craft effective cellphone policies, enhancing learning atmosphere and

discipline.
Review of Related Literature
Educational institutions worldwide are dealing with the issue of student cellphone use.
Despite attempts to enforce restrictions, a study by Merod (2023) reveals that 97% of 11- to 17-
year-olds in the U.S. use cellphones during school hours, primarily for social media, YouTube,
and gaming. Concerns about TikTok have led some states, like Florida and Montana, to impose
bans due to privacy and well-being concerns.

Efforts to enforce strict cellphone restrictions vary globally. Ontario, Canada, and France
have succeeded, while the U.S., particularly California, has faced challenges. Chan and
Narasuman's (2022) review emphasizes the need for balanced cellphone prohibition policies,
addressing both restrictions and educational uses.
Review of Related Literature
Awareness is crucial for policy adherence, as evident in studies on academic
integrity and amnesty policies. Anohina-Naumeca et al. (2020) found that students
aware of academic integrity policies were less tolerant of violations. Weaver (2022)
underscores the need for increased awareness of amnesty policies on college
campuses to enhance compliance.

Muyunda's (2021) study reveals practical challenges in policy implementation

within secondary schools due to a lack of clarity in goals and objectives. Social
norms significantly impact policy adherence, as demonstrated by Young and
Goldstein (2021) and Mortensen et al. (2019). Understanding these norms is
essential for crafting effective policies, as highlighted by Feldman (2018).
Methodology
The research design for this study is descriptive, employing a quantitative
approach to investigate cellphone prohibition adherence among students of
Don Jose Integrated High School. The descriptive design allows for the
systematic collection and analysis of numerical data, offering insights into
the demographic profiles, awareness levels, and compliance rates without
delving deeply into the underlying behaviors.
Sampling Technique
The research focuses on the entirety of Don Jose Integrated High School's
student body, encompassing 1587 students distributed across different grade
levels.
To ensure a well-rounded representation, a stratified sampling method was
implemented, considering grade levels as the sole stratification factor. A 10%
stratified sample was chosen from each grade level to maintain proportionality.
Research Instrument

The study uses survey questionnaire as the research instrument. Survey

questionnaire ensures efficient data collection from a diverse sample, allowing
a comprehensive analysis of students' demographic profile, awareness, and
compliance concerning cellphone usage prohibition . The structured survey
questions facilitate quantitative analysis, yielding statistical insights into
patterns and correlations among variables. The cost-effective nature of surveys
ensures a wide reach and the collection of substantial data within a short time
frame.
Statistical Treatment
1. Percentage
To determine the demographic characteristics of the participants concerning age, grade level, socio-
economic status, and academic performance, the researchers utilized the percentage to address the
first problem statement.

2.Weighted Mean
To determine the students' adherence level at Don Jose Integrated High School, the
researchers utilized the weighted mean in addressing the second problem statement.

3.Analysis of Variance (ANOVA)

To assess the difference in cellphone prohibition adherence among students at Don Jose
Integrated High School based on their demographic profiles, the researchers utilized Analysis
of Variance (ANOVA) to address the third problem statement.
Results

The following are the results of the study:

Table 1
Table 2
Table 3
Conclusion
This study has provided comprehensive insights into the adherence to cellphone
prohibition among students, encompassing awareness, compliance, and
demographic influences. The findings underscore the significance of maintaining a
distraction-free learning environment and prioritizing academic engagement over
cellphone usage. Despite variations in age, grade level, socioeconomic status, and
academic performance, students generally demonstrate a moderate level of
awareness and compliance with cellphone rules. Positive social influence from
peers further contributes to adherence to cellphone prohibition. Moving forward, it
is imperative to continue emphasizing the consequences of non-compliance and
crafting or reinforcing policies within the student handbook to support responsible
behavior and academic success.
Recommendation
Provide specific guidelines on when and where cellphones are allowed or prohibited, emphasizing the
importance of maintaining focus during class.

Include information on the school’s efforts to raise awareness about cellphone prohibition, such as
workshops, presentations, or campaigns. Encourage students to familiarize themselves with the rules by
referring to the handbook and other resources provided by the school.

Emphasize the importance of complying with cellphone rules and fostering a culture of responsible
cellphone usage. Encourage students to support each other in adhering to the prohibition and consider the
impact of their actions on the learning environment.
Recommendations
Acknowledge the research findings that demonstrate similar levels of adherence across
different demographic groups. Stress the importance of treating all students equally and
respecting their individual backgrounds and circumstances.

Highlight the connection between adherence to cellphone rules and academic

performance. Encourage students to prioritize their studies by minimizing distractions
from cellphone use during class time.
References
Anohina-Naumeca, A., Birzniece, I., & Odiņeca, T. (2020). Students’ awareness of the integrity
policy at a Latvian university. International Journal of Educational Integrity, 16, 12.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40979-020-00064-4

Cerruti, D., Daminato, C., & Filippini, M. (2019). The Impact of Policy Awareness: Evidence from Vehicle Choices
Response to Fiscal Incentives. Economics Working Paper Series, 19/316. ETH Zürich - CER-ETH - Center of
Economic Research at ETH Zurich. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3358407

Chan, Y. F., & Narasuman, S. (2022). The influence of mobile phone use on students’ academic behavior in higher
education. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education (IJERE), 11(4), 2060.
https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v11i4.23224

Feldman, Y. (2018). Social Norms and Compliance.Cambridge University Press.

https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/abs/law-of-good-people/social-norms-and-compliance/6008B0CB413356F3CE
6A399B7D102070
Klein, A. (2019, September 06). Schools say no to cellphones in class. But is it a smart move? Education Week.
https://www.edweek.org/technology/schools-say-no-to-cellphones-in-class-but-is-it-a-smart-move/2019/09

Loague, A., Caldwell, N., & Balam, E. (2018). Professors' attitudes and perceptions about technology use in the classroom. Alabama Journal of Educational Leadership, 5(1), 1-11.
https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1194726

McLeod, S. (2023). Social identity theory in psychology (Tajfel & Turner, 1979). Retrieved from https://www.simplypsychology.org/social-identity-theory.html

Merod, A. (2023). 97% of teens say they use their phones during the school day. K-12 Dive. Retrieved from https://www.k12dive.com/news/teen-cell-phone-use-schools/694901/

Mortensen, C. R., Neel, R., Cialdini, R. B., Jaeger, C. M., Jacobson, R. P., & Ringel, M. M. (2019). Trending Norms: A Lever for Encouraging Behaviors Performed by the Minority. Social
Psychological and Personality Science, 10(2), 201-210. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550617734615

Muyunda, G. (2021, June). Re-Entry Policy Implementation Effectiveness: A Case of Secondary Schools in Lusaka District, Zambia. Retrieved from
https://eric.ed.gov/?q=policy+awareness+in+school&id=ED629199

Santos, I.M., Bocheco, O. & Habak, C. A survey of student and instructor perceptions of personal mobile technology usage and policies for the classroom. Educ Inf Technol 23, 617–632 (2018).
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-017-9625-y

Setiawan, B., Afiff, A. Z., & Heruwasto, I. (2021). Personal norm and pro-environmental consumer behavior: An application of norm activation theory. ASEAN Marketing Journal, 13(1), Article 3.
DOI: 10.21002/amj.v131.13213

Steg, L., & Nordlund, A. (2018). Theories to explain environmental behavior. In Environmental psychology: An introduction. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119241072.ch22

Sunday, O. J., & Adesope, O. O. (2021). The effects of smartphone addiction on learning: A meta-analysis. Computers in Human Behavior Reports, 4(2), 100114. DOI: 10.1016/j.chbr.2021.100114

Weaver, G. M., Kroshus, E., Milroy, J., & Wyrick, D. (2022). Student awareness of campus medical amnesty policies. Journal of American College Health, 70(3), 810-817.
https://doi.org/10.1080/07448481.2020.1767112

Young, S. D., & Goldstein, N. J. (2021). Applying social norms interventions to increase adherence to COVID-19 prevention and control guidelines. Preventive Medicine, 145. Retrieved from
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0091743521000086