Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Presentation To The: IPC Seminar Challenges Facing The Doha Development Round Trade Negotiations On Agriculture
Presentation To The: IPC Seminar Challenges Facing The Doha Development Round Trade Negotiations On Agriculture
IPC Seminar Challenges facing the Doha Development Round Trade Negotiations On Agriculture
By MR. DEVI DAYAL Former Secretary Deptt of Banking ,Ministry of Finance Government of India.
From food shortages and import to self-sufficiency and exports. From subsistence farming to intensive and technology led cultivation. Today , India is the front ranking producer of many crops in the world. Ushered in through the green, white, blue and yellow revolutions
Total Geographical Area - 328 million hectares Net Area sown - 142 million hectares Gross Cropped Area 190.8 million hectares Major Crop Production (1999-2000)
89.5 million tonnes 75.6 million tonnes 30.5 million tonnes 13.4 million tonnes 20.9 million tonnes 29.9 million tonnes
Contributes to 24% of GDP Provides food to 1Billion people Sustains 65% of the population : helps alleviate poverty Produces 51 major Crops Provides Raw Material to Industries Contributes to 1/6th of the export earnings One of the 12 Bio-diversity centers in the world with over 46,000 species of plants and 86,000 species of animals recorded
5
Major Achievements
India is
Largest producer in the world of pulses , tea , and milk Second Largest producer of fruits, vegetables, wheat , rice, groundnut and sugarcane.
WEAKNESS
Rich Bio-diversity Arable land Climate Strong and well dispersed research and extension system
Bridgeable yield crops Exports Agro-based Industry Horticulture Untapped potential in the N.E.
Fragmentation of land Low Technology Inputs Unsustainable Water Management Poor Infrastructure Low value addition
Unsustainable Resource Use Unsustainable Regional Development Imports
OPPORTUNITIES
THREATS
Current Concerns
Pressure of the Population on Land Skewed distribution of operational holdings Land Degradation Water Balance Low level of mechanization Low Fertilizer Consumption
The First Ever National Agriculture Policy was announced in July 2000. The Policy seeks to overcome these constraints and achieve
A Growth rate in excess of 4 percent per annum in the agriculture sector. Growth that is based on efficient use of resources, and conserves our soil, water , and bio diversity. Growth with equity, i.e. growth which is widespread across regions, and different classes of farmers. Growth that is demand driven and stabilizes domestic markets and maximizes benefits from exports in the face of Global Challenges. Growth that is sustainable ,technologically , environmentally, and economically.
9
The Policy has indicated a nine-fold package of policy initiatives to achieve the objectives
Development of Sustainable agriculture Food and Nutritional security Generation and Transfer of Technology Improvement of input efficiency Provision of incentives for agriculture Promotion of Investments in agriculture Strengthening of institutional infrastructure Better risk management Introduction of Management Reforms
10
TARGETS
Food Grain Production will be doubled in ten years, so as to make India hunger free . Special emphasis will be on horticulture production in order to achieve a quantum increase. Allied sectors like live stock, dairy poultry, fisheries, will be promoted Production of oilseeds and pulses will be raised substantially.
11
12
To raise the processing level by 10% , an investment of approximately Rs 1400 billion required.
13
1500
1000 500 0 Exports Imports 2148 1736
Rs Billions
14
Agriculture exports from India account for less than 1% world trade in Agriculture commodities. - Target is to raise Indias share to 2% .
Thrust Areas
Improvement and maintenance of quality. Consonance with International Standards. Strengthening of Infrastructure. Identification of niche products and markets.
15
Marine Products Rice Wheat Condiments and Spuces Cashew Tea Coffee Castor Jute Fruits and Vegetables- Onions, Mango, Grapes, Banana, Tomato , Potato , Lichchi ,etc.
16
PART II
Negotiations on WTO Agreement On Agriculture
17
Prompted by surpluses in post-war period and consequent disarray in world agriculture. Disciplines with regard to all measures affecting trade in Agriculture envisaged. Including not only import access but also domestic policies, export subsidies , sanitary and phytosanitary measures.
18
AOA and Agreement of Application on Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures were negotiated in parallel Decision on measures concerning the possible negative effects of the reform programme o least developed and net food importing developing countries also a part of the package
19
Mandated Negotiations under Article 20 of AOA for continuation of the reform process
Negotiations to commence one year before the end of the implementation period i.e. in January 2000, taking into account: Experience in implementing reduction commitments Effect on world trade in Agriculture Non Trade concerns, S&D treatment Further Liberalization
20
Experience in the implementation of the Agreement leads us to conclude that basically the problems can be tackled on two planes, namely;
a)
Through positive efforts and binding commitments by Developed Countries in Undertaking substantive reductions in tariff levels, tariff escalation, trade distortive domestic support and elimination of export subsidies and tariff peaks,etc
21
b.
Through specific and targeted S&D provisions within the existing framework of AOA , which would go beyond longer transition periods and reduced rates of reduction, keeping in view the developmental objectives in developing countries
22
23
minimis level within a maximum period of three years by developed countries and five years by developing country members
24
concerns of developing countries through a food security box Developed country members should not be allowed to use SPS measures for protectionist purposes by prescribing overly stringent trade restrictive SPS measure for denying market access to developing countries
25
alleviation from rural development, rural employment and diversification of agriculture should be exempted from any reduction commitments
Market Access
Appropriate level of tariff bindings to be allowed to be
maintained by developing countries as a Special & Differential Measure , keeping in mind their developmental needs and high distortions prevalent in international markets
26
imposition of quantitative restrictions under specified circumstances to be made available to all developing countries in case of search in imports or decline in prices etc.
27
rationalized in earlier negotiations should be allowed to be raised to the ceiling bindings for similar category of products, committed during the Uruguay Round
28
developed countries through an appropriate formula Tariff reductions for developing countries should commensurate with their developmental needs Abolish TRQs. Restrictions on trade only in the form of tariffs and tariffs only If not possible ,then make their administration transparent , fair and equitable
29
Status of Negotiations
food security, domestic support and export subsides & cosponsored proposals on market access and export subsidies
30
Status of Negotiations
The second phase began in May 2001 and has concluded with
negotiations
A non paper on S&D presented by India in the Special Session held in February 2002
31
subsidy regimes in agriculture Australia , New Zealand and Canada (of Cairns Group) favor a totally market oriented approach and oppose trade distorting subsidies and protectionist regimes of EU and Japan US , opposing EU, but not completely with Cairns Group either, aggressively seeks market access in other WTO member countries
32
domestic subsidies as goals of on going agricultural negotiations Calls for better information and analysis of tariff rates tariff quota administration Supports transparent and targeted S&D for developing countries
33
significance of role of agriculture in their economies and seek to preserve domestic policy flexibility to guard food security concerns Developing Cairns Group Countries (Argentina, Brazil ,South Africa) favour a market oriented & non trade distortive approach Net Food Importing Countries (Single Crop economies) like Egypt, Mauritius, etc favour gradual and phased reduction in export subsidies
34
more transparent Get rid of special clauses and bilateral commodity specific arrangements Eliminate discretion in application of SPS standards Abolish export subsidies completely within a time frame of 3 to 5 years. Include all forms of export subsidies in the calculation of total subsidies
35
agriculture to protect our food security and livelihood concerns Retaining appropriate level of bound tariffs for protecting our farmers Seek additional opportunities for increasing our exports
36
The long term objective of establishing a fair and market oriented trading system reaffirmed Need for fundamental reform through strengthened rules and specific commitments on support and protection reiterated Comprehensive negotiations sought for affecting:
substantial improvements in market access
of export subsidies
37
Substantial reduction in trade distorting domestic support Special & Differential treatment to be an integral part of the negotiations Modalities for further commitments to be finalised by 31March 2003 Comprehensive draft schedules to be submitted by the 5th Session of the Ministerial Conference
38
Market Access
Tariff line wise analysis required to be undertaken to formalize our position with regard to tariff reductions In depth study with regard to the utility and application of the special safegaurd mechanism for developing countries like India Formulate our position on Tariff Rate Quotas (TRQs)with a view to increasing our market access through the same
39
Review of the Green Box measures to make them more development oriented An analysis of the current level of trade distorting support and subsidies which are required to be disciplined in view of the prevalent distortions in the international market Developing disciplines on export credits ,export guarantees, insurance , etc
40
Specific modalities under the 3 areas of market access , domestic support and export subsidies would need to be developed This would involve development of sound economic justification for seeking either differential rate of reduction or specific measures so as to safegaurd food and livelihood security objectives in developing countries agricultural sector
41
THANK YOU
42