Roadmap For The Presentation

ROADMAP STRATEGIC PLANNING BCG & GE MATRIX ABOUT GE CLASSIFICATION STRATEGIES BCG v/s GE CASE STUDY

Strategic Planning
 It is the management task concerned with the growth and future of business enterprise.  It provides the route map for the firm and helps to take decision in the future with a greater awareness

BCG & GE Matrix

Relative Position (Market Share) Market Attractiveness Business Strength

Market Growth

About GE Matrix
 Developed by McKinsey & Company in 1970s.  GE is a model to perform business portfolio analysis on the SBUs.  GE is rated in terms of Market Attractiveness & Business Strength  It is an Enlarged & Sophisticated version of BCG.

Classification
Business Strength
Strong High Medium Weak
5.00

Market Attractiveness

3.67

Medium

2.33

Low
5.00

3.67

2.33

1.00

Market Attractiveness
        Annual market growth rate Overall market size Historical profit margin Current size of market Market structure Market rivalry Demand variability Global opportunities

Business Strength
Current market share Brand image Brand equity Production capacity Corporate image Profit margins relative to competitors  R & D performance  Managerial personal  Promotional effectiveness      

Strategies
 Protect Position Invest to grow Effort on maintaining strength  Invest to Build Challenge for leadership Build selectively on strength  Build Selectively Invest in most attractive segment Build up ability to counter competition Emphasize profitability by raising productivity

Strategies
 Protect & Refocus Manage for current earning Defend strength  Selectivity for Earning Protect existing program Investments in profitable segments

 Build Selectively
Specialize around limited strength Seek ways to overcome weaknesses Withdraw if indication of sustainable growth are lacking

Strategies
 Limited Expansion for Harvest Look for ways to expand without high risk  Manage for Earnings Protect position in profitable segment Upgrade product line Minimize investment  Harvest Sell at time that will maximize cash value Cut fixed costs and avoid investment meanwhile

Factors Underlying Market Attractiveness

Factors Resource availability Overall market size Annual Market growth rate Profitability Competitive intensity Technological requirements Total Weight 0.20 0.15 0.20 0.15 0.10 0.20 1.0 Rating (1 5) 2.5 3 3 3 2.5 2.5 Value = (Weight * Rating) 0.5 0.45 0.6 0.45 0.25 0.5 2.75

Factors Underlying Market Strength

Factors Weight Rating (1 5) 5 3.5 4 3 3 4.5 4.5 3 Value = (Weight * Rating) 0.75 0.35 0.40 0.45 0.45 0.45 0.45 0.45 3.75 Market share New product development Brand Image Sales force Pricing Distribution capacity Product quality R&D Performance Total 0.15 0.10 0.10 0.15 0.15 0.10 0.10 0.15 1.0

Classification
Business Strength
Strong High Medium Weak
5.00

Market Attractiveness

3.67

Medium

2.33

Low
5.00

3.67

2.33

1.00

Case Study

Overview
High High

Business Strengths

Low

Market Attractiveness

Attractive

Moderate Attractive

Unattractive

Low

Case Study of TATA

 TATA

IT (Information Technology) : TCS Consumer Durable : Automobiles, Titan etc. Textiles : Tata Fabrics, West Sides etc

GE Matrix For TATA

High High

Business Strengths
IT Consumer Durables

Low

Market Attractiveness

Low

Textiles

BCG v/s GE
BCG Market Growth Market share 4 cell Multi Products Primary tools GE Market Attractiveness Market strength 9 cell Multi Business Units Secondary tools

Bibliography
 Corporate Strategies - Bani Banerjee  Marketing Management - Philip Kotler  Strategic Planning - V S Ramaswamy