Launching The BMW Z3 Roadster

You might also like

Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 11

Launching the BMW Z3 Roadster Presented by: Group 1

2/23/2012

BMW Group International


Cars produced BMW, MINI and Rolls-Royce HQ in Munich, Germany. Operations in 150 countries Attractive 'four-cylinder' tower as main office building

2/23/2012

BMW Sales Needed Attention


700 600 500 400 300 200 100 0 1984 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 US Unit Sales(in thousands) Worldwide Unit Sales(in thousands)

2/23/2012

Z3 Concept Tests Were Conducted


Revealed interest across life stage segments Image conscious Gen X Aspirational car for men and women in 40s Nostalgia for late baby boomers Identified commonalities across groups Lover of Life mindset Propensity to seek unique expressions of individuality

2/23/2012

Why Spartanburg?
Displayed commitment to dealers and American people

that BMW is here to stay Provided cost advantages

High cost environment in Germany Cushion against monetary fluctuations


However, also posed challenges To convince consumers that quality of cars produced in the USA would be no different from cars produced in Germany

2/23/2012

So What Did BMW Aim For?


To expand the BMW franchise & market share Target of 100,000 annually in USA To rejuvenate the BMW brand by positioning the Z3

squarely in American culture and settling into the hearts and minds of the American public To make BMW a global brand
Transition from Made in Germany Made by BMW

NT marketing and its benefits & risks


It encompasses anything that is not TV, radio, standard print or direct advertising Benefits  Easy to grab consumers attention  High retention rate  Efficiency through word of mouth  Cost effective

NT marketing and its benefits & risks


Risks  Less control over a. Target audience b. Timing c. What is said  difficult to measure impact

How does NT marketing work?


Awareness / Visibility

Awareness

Word of mouth, Buzz

Interest

Excitement

Desire/ preference
Involvement / Infatuation Consumer Advocacy

Purchase
Purchase

Traditional vs. NT marketing


Elements Philosophy Process of Communication effects Competence required/ level of complexity/ Benefits Traditional marketing leverage on media used slow Good competence required/ Highly complex / easy to measure effectiveness high and cost can be calculated can be well targeted through mass media very easy High skill required NT marketing leverage on Buzz word fast relatively low competence required/ very low complexity/ cost effective comparatively low and cost can be easily forecasted depend on customer self selection not easy Low skill required

Budgeting

Target Market Evaluation of effectiveness Skills required

Thank You

You might also like