Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Pulp Treatment Nakabeh
Pulp Treatment Nakabeh
Pulp Treatment Nakabeh
children The first treatment decision for the young patient with one or more extensively carious primary molars is whether to retain or extract these teeth
Diagnosis
It
is important to try to provisionally diagnose the likely pulpal status of the tooth concerned, Clinical signs and symptoms Special investigations
Special investigations
1 Gentle finger pressure may determine whether the tooth is mobile or tender 2 Pulpal sensibility testing is not appropriate for primary molars
Special investigations
3 Radiographs are mandatory to provide information about The extent of the caries and the proximity to pulp horn Presence of any periradicular pathology Degree of pathological or physiological root resorption Presence of a successor
Bitewing
Periapical
factors
Patients at risk from an extraction (e.g. bleeding disorders, hereditary angiooedema) Patients at risk if a general anaesthetic is required for tooth removal (e.g. cystic brosis, muscular dystrophies)
Local Anesthesia
Surface Injection
anaesthesia
Topical anaesthesia
Sprays Solutions Creams Ointments
Topical
Dry area of application 2. Anaesthetic applied over a limited area 3. Anaesthetic applied for sufficient time
1.
L.A Techniques
Interseptal
Maxillary infiltration
0.5
to 1.0 ml is sufficient for pulpal anaesthesia of most teeth in children Onset of pulp anesthesia: 3-5 min Duration :30-60 min
IAN block
Introduce
the short needle from the primary molars of the opposite side and syringe held parallel to the mandibular occlusal plane of insertion about 5mm above the mandibular occlusal plane
Point
Onset of pulpal anesthesia: 10-15 min Duration: 90 min and sometimes up to 2.5 hours
Rule of 10
Age of patient + number of the tooth
If < 10 infiltration has a good chance of working If 10 infiltration not enough alternative
Interseptal
Deposition
of LA in porous alveolar bone (base of the interdental papilla) Minimal soft tissue anaesthesia Minimum amount of anaesthesia required Leakage of LA solution (taste)
Interseptal
Interseptal
Apply
0.2-0.4
Blanching
Intraligamental
Also called periodontal ligament anaesthesia Old technique 1912 to 1923 in local anaesthetic books
Technique
Insert a 27 or 30 gauge needle at ~ 30 degrees to the long axis of the tooth into the gingival sulcus
mesial and distal of the tooth Advance needle until there is firm resistance
Technique
Wait 15 sec after injection before remove needle Onset is rapid Duration of pulpal anesthesia 10-20 min
Advantages of Intraligamental
Localized area (one tooth) without extensive soft tissue anaesthesia Minimal amount of anaesthesia used 0.2ml per root Rapid onset Alternative to block
Articaine 4%
For routine-type interventions during minor procedures Articaine 4% Epinephrine (Adrenaline) 1:200000
For complicated procedures requiring prolonged anaesthesia Articaine 4% Epinephrine (Adrenaline) 1:100000
Buccal infiltrations of articaine with epinephrine did not differ in their efficacy in obtaining pulpal anesthesia for mandibular permanent first molars.
Ian P. Corbett et al :Articaine Infiltration for Anesthesia of Mandibular First Molars JOE Volume 34, Number 5, May 200
Materials
Calcium hydroxide should be followed by glass ionomer cement or reinforced zinc oxide eugenol to prevent microleakage since the calcium hydroxide has a high solubility, poor seal and low compressive strength Dentine bonding agents Resin modified glass ionomer
Indirect pulp capping should be followed by a good restoration that prevents microleakage It is not necessary to reenter the primary tooth to remove residual caries after indirect pulp capping as long as there is a good seal and secondary dentine forms
Advantages if IPC
Has a high success rate in long term studies even higher than pulpotomy Normal exfoliation time of teeth
Pulpotomy
Indicated in cases of pulp exposure due to caries removal or mechanical pulp exposure but without radicular pathology
The coronal pulp is amputated and the rest of radicular pulp is treated with a long term clinically successful medicament
materials
Buckleys solution of formocresol Ferric sulfate Gluteraldehyde Electrosurgery MTA Others (BMP, collagen)
Success rates
Formocresol and ferric sulfate have the same long term success rates The highest success rate was for the MTA Electrosurgery, calcium hydroxide and gluteraldehyde had a lower success rates than FC and FS
Concern
This resulted in the withdrawal of Buckleys formocresol and all paraformaldehydecontaining devitalising pastes from the majority of teaching hospitals.
Buckleys formocresol
Tricresol 35% Formaldehyde 19% Glycerol 15% Water 31% A dilution of 1/5 th have been shown to be as equally effective and less toxic
A cotton pellet used with only a trace of FC on the pulp stumps for 5 minutes Be aware not to touch the soft tissue it will cause burns It causes fixation of the pulp tissue in radicular pulp Use reinforced zinc oxide eugenol as a base material directly over the pulp stumps
Restore the tooth with proper restorative material (SSC, amalgam, compomer) if bleeding does not stop then the radicular pulp is inflammed and this indicates a pulpectomy
Ferric sulfate
It is an astringent, stops bleeding by agglutination of blood proteins to make a plug that seals the blood capillaries It promotes pulpal haemostasis through chemical reaction with blood It controls bleeding and forms a protective metalprotein clot over underlying vital radicular pulp
Used
in a 15.5% for 15 seconds on the pulp stumps to stop bleeding Use glass ionomer as a base and not zinc oxide eugenol It is considered to be a good substitute to FC pulpotomy with the same success rate
Pulpotomy should be checked for clinical and radiographic success after 6 months and then yearly
Pulpectomy
Indicated for teeth with irriversible pulpitis or necrotic pulp Difficult on molars due to tortuous and irregular pulp canals Beware of tooth buds
The canals should be debrided and irrigated with normal saline 0.9%, chlorhexidine solution 0.4% or sodium hypochlorite solution 0.1%
Filling material used in the canals ( non reinforced zinc oxide eugenol, iodoform paste KRI, iodoform paste with non setting calcium hydroxide Vitapex or Endoflax)
Then the tooth restored with a material to prevent microleakage Clinical and radiographic evidence of success should be checked after 6 months There should be no pathologic resorptoin or radicular radioleucency and no signs of abcess or sinus tract
Used when the tooth has a deep caries and is diagnosed with reversible pulpitis and in this case if all the decay is completely removed endodontic therapy will be needed
In the recent years the focus was to do it as a one step proceedure that is to remove the affected dentine as close as possible to the pulp and use a protective liner, a base and a restorative material that prevents microleakage (no need to reenter the tooth again)
More recently a two step technique was shown to be succesful in managing teeth with reversible pulpitis due to deep caries and so the technique was revised
Step one
Remove the carious dentine along the DEJ and only excavate the outer most infected dentine leaving a carious mass over the pulp
This has the following objectives 1)Reduce the number of bacteria 2)Close the remaining caries from the biofilm in the oral cavity 3)Slow or arrest the caries development
Step two
Wait for 3-6 months this is to allow provisional diagnosis of pulp status and allow enough time for tertiary dentine formation Reenter the tooth and remove the rest of caries (dentin will be darker, harder and dry resulting in shrinkage of the tissues leaving a void under the restoration) Do your final restoration
Follow up
Clinically no signs and symptoms Radiographically normal tooth structure and most important in immature teeth with open apex is continued root development (Apexogenesis )
Partial pulpotomy
Used in immature permanent teeth diagnosed with normal pulp or reversible pulpitis when there is exposure due to caries or trauma
Proceedure
Control the pulp bleeding using irrigation with a bactericidal agent like sodium hypochlorite or chlorhexidine Remove 1-3 mm (or more) below the exposure site using a sterile high speed diamond round bur with good cooling The bleeding should be controlled in minutes if not then go deeper to remove inflamed pulp tissue
Cover the site with calcium hydroxide or MTA The calcium hydroxide has a good success rate but the MTA has a more predictable action In case of MTA 1.5 mm thickness is used Then cover with a layer of resin modified glass ionomer to ensure seal then the final restoration
Follow up
Clinically no sign and symptoms Radiographically continue root development, no internal or external resorption, no abnormal canal calcification and no lesions
Apexification
It is the process of inducing root end closure of an incompletely formed non vital permanent tooth by removing the non vital coronal and radicular pulp just short of the root end and placing a biocompatible material
Procedure
After removal of the necrotic pulp debris put a non setting calcium hydroxide dressing for 2 weeks then irrigate and dry canal Do not weaken dentine walls with too much filing Take a WL and put your non setting calcium hydroxide and seal the tooth properly
The apical seal takes 9-12 months to form You have to change the dressing every 3 months Check your barrier with a paper point and radiographically When the apical barrier has formed you can obturate the canal with GP up to the level of barrier formation
MTA composition
Tricalcium silicate Dicalcium silicate Tricalcium aluminate Tetracalcium aluminoferrite Gypsum Bismuth oxide (to detect the material on radiograph) The grey MTA contains iron
Procedure
Necrotic tissues should be removed from canal and it was suggested to use nonsetting calcium hydroxide as an intracanal medicament for 2 weeks After that irrigate and dry canal use the MTA to make an apical barrier and plug it for 4mm at least using special MTA pluggers
MTA needs 4-6 hours to set in humid conditions so seal tooth with a moist cotton Next day obturate using GP and finish your treatment
Thank you